Yes and no. It's not the cleanest shoot, but when someone resists arrests and dives into their vehicle, you don't know whether there's a concealed gun they're diving for or if they're driving away or what. A case can be made justifying this (granted, this all assumes we live in a fair society with a balanced judiciary, which is not the case.)
lmao man, the statistics paint a very different picture.
Absolutely, the official narrative in a healthy society should be: When you resist arrest, shit can go wrong & that's your responsibility.
anyone else getting an "opportunist" vibe from Boebert rather than something more genuine?
It's a hotly contested topic, but a pure isolation of the Measles virus has never been done.
Wondering if you've seen my other reply.
We should have fought in 1913.
I agree with you, but I'm trying to bolster this argument.
Measles has never been isolated either, but we have an ostensibly successful vaccination & I'm pretty sure it's fair to suggest that Measles exists. How would you claim this is different? Also, I'm wondering what percentage of viruses have been successfully isolated to your standard.
oh boy, be careful
You're correct, but an Eotech is not a red-dot as the guy you're replying to mentions. It's a holographic optic which is vastly friendlier to users with astigmatism than red-dot optics. Many users are able to use holographics with no problem compared to huge starburst issues with aimpoints or etc.
Sure do, here's a great compilation.
It's not totally clear what you mean, but the massive & overwhelming preponderance of evidence shows no benefit to mask usage.
I guess I'm not very clear on how treatment plans are created and adopted at all. For instance, whoever "decided" on the best way to treat anything? And how does that treatment become common practice everywhere?
Fair enough. Has an incumbent president ever failed to receive their party's nomination for reelection?
So the argument is that ventilator usage is typically a dangerous last resort, yet it has been used very liberally for hospital patients with suspected COVID and has actually contributed to the death count?
Okay, I can see that. But who's making these treatment recommendations? Why is it such a standard practice for COVID & what is the source of that treatment plan?
"Only AFTER he'd already won the Republican nomination, and they booted him from the party so they could run someone else."
What? Taft was the incumbent Republican president and of course had the R nomination, which is why Roosevelt had to run third-party.
The two-term limit was established in 1951.
Please let me know if you or anyone reading this find any further material on this subject.
It's not that formerly smart people have become stupid, it's that the amped up propaganda of the previous year has revealed whose intelligence was propped up by official sources and who is actually intelligent and capable of thinking for themselves.
Can you redpill me on ventilators? I see this cited very often but have never received an explanation.
trannies getting old
?
It's an individual's right to try whatever risky, new medical procedure they'd like, agreed.
The problem I see is that we're being lambasted 24/7 with that lie that this is entirely safe and effective. A huge percentage of the people that are lining up to take this vaccine would never consider it if they were receiving honest information about how novel and dangerous this new gene therapy actually is.
It's amazing to watch "scientists" all just unanimously forget about chromosomes
Of course porn is not the root cause of all our problems, I've never said that - a problem can still be worthy of discussion regardless of whether or not it's The Problem. All I've contended is that mass porn-use is a problem; if you truly disagree with that, then (miraculously) you're even more blind than you seem.
Obviously, the root cause is to be found at the level of individual responsibility - the responsibility that men en masse are refusing to take. It's pretty clear that you're desperate for any formulation that positions women as the root cause for the degradation of masculinity but that's a weak perspective. Women will be as degenerate and abominable as a society's men will allow - like water poured into a glass, they'll fulfill the substrate. And you'll get no disagreement from me; the average women today are abominable. But nonetheless, the average women are offering less because the average men allow them to. Any other perspective on the situation does not appropriately sanctify men with the leadership role they obviously fulfill (for better, or for worse).
I don't think we disagree on very much & I hope this distinguishes my point-of-view from the straw-man you've been working so hard to build.
You're a retard - medical science is reportedly so incapable of chemically isolating this virus that it has to resort to an untested gene therapy instead of a traditional vaccine. I'm not even saying that the virus doesn't exist, but there are very rational reasons to be suspicious.