BOOM
https://www.i-sis.org.uk/Glyphosate_and_Cancer.php
The carcinogenic potential of glyphosate has been known since the 1980s. An excellent review on glyphosate toxicity written by Caroline Cox of Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides, Eugene, Oregon in the US published in 1995 showed that most if not all the toxic effects of glyphosate had already been demonstrated in laboratory studies [7]. Glyphosate was not only acutely toxic to animals and human beings; subchronic studies showed that feeding glyphosate to animals for three months caused “reduced weight gain, diarrhea, and salivary gland lesion.” Lifetime feeding caused “excess growth and death of liver cells, cataracts and lens degeneration, and increase in the frequency of thyroid, pancreas and liver tumors.” Also documented were effects on fertility: reduced sperm counts in males and lengthening of the oestrus cycle in females.
Cancers occurred in the VERY FIRST trials of Glyphosate:
Among the unsettling results of the Séralini study [1], which almost certainly lie behind its notorious retraction by the journal editor a year after it was published ([2] Retracting Seralini Study Violates Science & Ethics, SiS 61), are cancers in rats fed GM maize and/or exposed to Roundup. Although the word ‘cancer’ was never used by the authors, they recorded three ‘metastases’ (i.e., cancers) - two in females and one in a male - plus two kidney Wilm’s tumours in male rats, which had to be euthanized a year early because the cancerous tumours grew to more than 25 % of body size. This makes a total of at least 5 cancers in the treatment groups, in addition to the excess of grotesquely large tumours, premature deaths, pituitary, kidney, liver, and other pathologies compared with the controls. The cancer cases certainly should not be ignored, and to make sure this important paper is not erased from public record, it is now freely available and permanently registered on thesparc [3] a floating knowledge archive for the survival of people and planet. The findings are especially important in the light of new research and indeed, previous research on the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate (and GM food).
.
https://atlantablackstar.com/2018/01/24/really-happened-clinton-foundation-haiti/
The January 2010 earthquake in Haiti killed an estimated 220,000 people. International donors pledged an estimated $13.3 billion in aid to the Caribbean nation in the wake of the devastation. Along with Haitian Prime Minister Jean-Max Bellerive, former President Bill Clinton, who was UN Special Envoy to Haiti, became co-chairman of the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC). From January 2010 through June 2012, $9.04 billion in international funding was raised — $3.04 billion from individuals and companies, and $6.04 billion from bilateral and multilateral donors. Of the $6.04 billion, 9.6 percent, or $580 million went to the Haitian government, while 0.6 percent or $36.2 million went to local Haitian organizations. The lion’s share, 89.8 percent of $5.4 billion went to non-Haitian organizations, including private contractors, international NGOs, and military and civilian agencies of donor countries, including the Pentagon, which charged the State Department hundreds of millions of dollars.
Critics have pointed at the Clinton Foundation, alleging the charity had control over the billions of dollars in aid to Haiti. During the 2016 presidential campaign, the Clintons’ involvement in Haiti translated into mixed feelings in the Haitian-American community about Hillary Clinton, ranging from low enthusiasm to disappointment and anger. As secretary of state, Clinton supported the presidency of Michel Martelly, intruding into Haitian electoral politics by flying to Haiti in 2011 to pressure President René Préval to allow Martelly to participate in a two-person runoff. Martelly won. As president, Martelly selected Special Envoy Bill Clinton’s chief of staff as prime minister, and gave important positions to people with criminal backgrounds, and was known for corruption and violent government repression, and attempting to install his successor. Mrs. Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, became a member of an advisory board of a mining company that owns a gold mine in Haiti and was introduced to the company through the Clinton Global Initiative arm of the Clinton Foundation. All of this fueled speculation that the United States and the Clintons were installing a puppet government and engaging in profiteering and drew the ire of Haitians and Haitian-Americans.
According to right-wing commentator and financial analyst Charles Ortel in an interview with journalist H.A. Goodman in Huffington Post, the hurricane created an opportunity for the Clinton Foundation and its allies to raise considerable resources, but with little accounting of these funds. “The Clintons seem to be ‘merchants around misery’, operating as a kind of ‘Robin Hood in Reverse’ — there are many disasters that they seem to have exploited,” Ortel said. “In brief, the Clinton Foundation solicited massive sums to ‘fight HIV/AIDS’ but did not check carefully enough to ensure that these drugs were supplied in intact form, and neither adulterated nor watered-down,” he added. The Nation also reported the “hurricane-proof” classroom trailers the foundation used in Haiti were structurally unsafe and laced with formaldehyde, a product of the same company sued by Hurricane Katrina victims.
Reflecting the anger against the Clintons among the Haitian-American community, on January 12, the Committee to Mobilize Against Dictatorship in Haiti (Komokoda) held a protest outside the Clinton Foundation headquarters in New York City. Speaking at the protest was Dahoud Andre, president of Komokoda and a radio host.
The organization says it continues to protest the Clintons because “there is still no justice despite the billions they have stolen through Bill Clinton’s position (as) UN Special Envoy to Haiti in March of 2009 in the aftermath of 4 major storms which devastated parts of our country; through the post 2010 earthquake Interim Haiti Reconstruction Commission; through foreign governments and corporations funneling hundreds of millions (most of them undisclosed) for favors from then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the Clinton Foundation under the guise of helping Haiti; and through the Clinton-Bush Fund,” Komokoda said in a press statement. In light of the announcement by the Justice Department, the group says it remains vigilant and demands a serious investigation, and that any crimes are fully prosecuted and punished. “It is itself a crime that this Justice Department prosecuted and got a conviction against Corrine Brown, Florida’s first African-American Congressperson since Reconstruction for corruption related to $800,000 from her ‘One Door for Education’ charity and yet it took them this long to even start an investigation of the Clintons,” the statement added.
Komokoda’s claims of the Justice Department’s tardiness in looking at the Clintons notwithstanding, Bill and Hillary Clinton have together and separately weathered multiple federal and congressional investigations ranging from Whitewater in the 1990s through the probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email servers as secretary of state that wrapped up in 2016 during her campaign for president. The latest probe, a renewal of an investigation that began under the Obama administration, has found the Clintons prepared to respond.
The Clinton Foundation told Atlanta Black Star that it raised $30 million for the Haiti earthquake relief efforts, and did not have control over the bulk of the $9 billion raised for Haiti. “Overall, we’d point out that many of the claims about the Clinton Foundation and Haiti have been found to be flat-out false,” the Clinton Foundation press office said in a statement. “All funding collected by the Clinton Foundation for Haiti was distributed in full to aid groups on the ground, and we have documented which groups received this funding and what it was for. The Clinton Foundation did not take a penny in overhead for our work.”
The foundation also pointed to various refuted claims, including Trump’s assertion that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did favors for Clinton Foundation donors, and that “Hillary Clinton set aside environmental and labor rules to help a South Korean company with a record of violating workers’ rights set up what amounts to a sweatshop in Haiti.” Politifact depicted his claim as “mostly false.” BBC reported that the foundation and the State Department arranged with the Haitian government for a $300 million, 600-acre factory to produce clothing for retail giants such as Target, Walmart and Old Navy. Several hundred farmers were evicted to clear the land, and the South Korean textile company Sae-A Trading Co. later donated between $50,000 and $100,000 to the foundation. While Clinton said the facility would produce 100,000 jobs, only 8,000 were created.
The Washington Post rebutted another allegation, that Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation raised hundreds of millions of dollars for a hospital that was never built. Further, Jonathan Katz, who was the Associated Press correspondent in Port-au-Prince during the earthquake, wrote a piece in Slate stating that “neither I nor anyone else has found the coveted evidence of either Clinton making off with vast sums of money from Haiti or the relief effort.” Katz offers the historical backdrop of U.S. intervention in Haiti and elsewhere, and the failed earthquake recovery in Haiti, which led to spiraling inflation and spikes in violence. “No two individuals, including Haiti’s own leaders, enjoyed more power and influence than the Clintons in the morass of the failed reconstruction following the deadly Jan. 12, 2010, earthquake, when a troubled country managed to go from catastrophe to worse,” he said, arguing that there is no proof the goal was to financially benefit the Clintons.
Katz did find fault with Hillary Clinton for pursuing “badly flawed” vision of prosperity for Haiti focused on “foreign investment in tourism, construction, and low-wage garment factories” which would mean low wages and little money flowing in the local economy, rather than the stated goal of reliving Haitians from poverty and preventing future refugee crises. That model, he argued, has been pursued by the U.S. since the 1960s. “The system isn’t designed for them; it’s for us. The low wages that the U.S. embassy helped suppress are the reason we can enjoy a steady stream of $9 Mossimo camisoles and $12.99 six-packs of Hanes T-shirts. Even U.S. military uniform parts get made in Haitian sweatshops,” Katz added.
Snopes has debunked two conspiracy theories that have circulated in conservative circles and among misinformation news sites, specifically that former Haitian official Klaus Oberwein died of a suspicious suicide days before he was scheduled to testify against the Clinton Foundation or Hillary Clinton, and that a “U.S. surgeon who exposed ‘Clinton Foundation corruption in Haiti’ was found dead in his home under suspicious circumstances.” And Bill Clinton denied any claims that the Clinton Foundation used money designated for Haiti for personal means.
While there is disagreement over the role of the Clinton Foundation in Haiti, it is certain that billions of dollars were raised for Haiti. The American Red Cross raised $500 million for Haiti, spent one-quarter of the funds on internal expenses and only built six houses. The people of Haiti, the first Black republic, have suffered and continue to suffer. Everyone has failed Haiti.
TAGS 2010 HAITI EARTHQUAKE CLINTON FOUNDATION IN HAITI HAITI EARTHQUAKE THE CLINTON FOUNDATION What people are saying SHOW COMMENTS
'Former Ambassador John Negroponte Endorses BIDEN'
By the way... Negroponte's own daughter was arrested this year for FIRST DEGREE MURDER:
https://people.com/crime/john-negroponte-daughter-sophia-arrested-for-first-degree-murder/
https://www.michigandaily.com/opinion/02viewpoint-negropontes-war-crimes27
Negroponte’s crimes are well documented in the online National Security Archive. During the early 1980s Negroponte worked as U.S. ambassador to Honduras, where he helped ensure the flow of aid to brutal regimes in Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala and assisted the Contra terror forces that targeted civilians in Nicaragua (where a progressive government had overthrown the U.S.-backed dictator in 1979). By the end of the 1980s, over 200,000 people were killed as a result of U.S. intervention in Central America. They systematically massacred, “disappeared,” tortured and raped students, labor organizers, peasant and indigenous leaders, priests and nuns, journalists and others suspected of “dissent.” Negroponte’s strategy for dealing with criticisms of his own record has been simple: just deny the facts completely. Confronted with revelations about Honduran death squads in 1982, for instance, he replied that the reports were “simply untrue” and that Hondurans enjoyed “liberal democratic institutions including full freedom of expression.”
Negroponte’s oversight of the regime in neighboring El Salvador provides an indication of how he handled dissent. In 1980, after decades of state repression of peaceful protest, five Salvadoran peasant guerrilla groups formed the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (in Spanish: Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional) to fight the U.S.-backed dictatorship. The United States provided the Salvadoran military with $1 million a day over the course of the 1980s to eliminate the potential civilian support base of the FMLN. In one 1981 example, General Domingo Monterrosa, trained at the School of the Americas in Fort Benning, Georgia, ordered the massacre of over 1,000 civilians in and around the village of El Mozote. In the early 1990s, forensic exhumations of El Mozote revealed that a single mass grave included the remains of 143 children under age 12. Concepción Sánchez, three days old, was the youngest victim, though death squads also cut out the fetuses of pregnant women. The El Mozote massacre was unique only for its size; countless other civilian massacres stained the Salvadoran landscape with blood in the 1980s. Virtually all were committed by U.S.-backed state and paramilitary forces, as a UN Truth Commission report confirmed.
This savagery helped pave the way for the later imposition of neoliberal economic policies, which Negroponte himself advanced in places like Mexico and Iraq. Neoliberalism involves the privatization of public resources, the reduction in state spending on things like education, and, generally speaking, the removal of all barriers to corporate profits. It includes “free-trade” agreements like NAFTA and the looming Trans-Pacific Partnership, which seek to enhance the power and profits of U.S. corporations and banks overseas. Since this agenda is usually unpopular, military force is often necessary for eliminating dissent and “ensuring uninhibited access to key markets, energy supplies and strategic resources,” in the words of Clinton-era Secretary of Defense William Cohen. Negroponte learned valuable lessons about exterminating dissenters from his time in Central America. As U.S. ambassador to Iraq, he helped develop what some officials and journalists at the time called the “Salvador Option”: the training of Iraqi death squads to eliminate resistance to the occupation and the neoliberal model.
POTUS at CIA Headquarters in Langley, VA. The day after The Inauguration.
QDrop #4626
I believe the Silenced Majority exists and can reverse the damage from the Covid Psyop, rapidly.
But how many more lives are going to be destroyed? Honest, hard working and patriotic Americans are being wiped out daily.
How much longer do we have to dance to the tune of BLM and Corporate Covid Overlords?
A stroke almost always causes a droopy face on one side. This is caused by blockage of blood flow in the brain to the nerves that supply the facial muscles. Other symptoms include weakness on one side of the body, slurred speech, trouble walking, dizziness, and lack of consciousness.
The last two Dem candidates for President have been propped up by a team of doctors and chaperones, making sure they don't fall on their face.
SIDEOFBEEF2.0
.
O_o
BORN RICH ( 2003 )
THE FILM >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sD3pG74Wv8
THE CAST:
Georgina Bloomberg — born to New York City mayor and media mogul, Michael Bloomberg.
Stephanie Ercklentz — born to socialite Mai Harrison and New York corporate lawyer,
Enno W. Ercklentz Jr., son of banker and industrialist Enno W. Ercklentz Sr.
Christina Floyd — born to golf champion, Raymond Floyd.
Cody Franchetti — an Italian baron and Milliken textiles heir, born to actress Angelica Ippolito and Baron Andrea Franchetti, son of Baron Mario Franchetti and American heiress Anne Milliken.
Juliet Hartford — born to model Diane Brown and A&P heir, Huntington Hartford, grandson of a principal founder of A&P, George Huntington Hartford.
Josiah Cheston Hornblower — a Vanderbilt / Whitney heir born to Alexandra Thorne, daughter of Whitney Tower, a grandson of Gertrude Vanderbilt and Harry Payne Whitney. He is also a descendant of Josiah Hornblower, a delegate from New Jersey to the Continental Congress.
Jamie Johnson — born to Johnson & Johnson heir, James Loring Johnson, son of John Seward Johnson
S.I. Newhouse IV — born to Condé Nast publishing heir, Samuel Irving Newhouse III, son of Samuel Irving Newhouse, Jr.
Ivanka Trump — born to real estate tycoon and 45th US President, Donald Trump,[22] son of real estate developer Fred Trump.
Benjamin Luke Weil — son of Scientific Games Corporation Chairman & CEO, A. Lorne Weil.
Carlo von Zeitschel — Kaiser Wilhelm II's great-grandson who is both a German baron and an Italian viscount
