ITS GONNA BE EPIC!
and do what exactly?
where is the lin wood lawsuit affidavit?
it was more of a rhetorical lol
does scanning a ballot 10 times actually count it 10 times? How is there not some sort of system in place that dumps duplicate ballots. Surely each ballot has a unique barcode on it, right?
I can totally see someone filling out one ballot in one county/state and then filling out a ballot in another county/state and that duplicate ballot not being discarded.
But the exact same ballot 10x? I know government is retarded, but is it really that retarded?
where does Q even post now a days. Feel like I've havent seen "drops" in ages
no way trump tweets something this explosive without looking at the evidence. I'm sure the court filings will start dropping friday, he loves dropping good news on fridays
- The Elections Clause of the United States Constitution states that “[t]he Times, Places, and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” U.S. Const. Art. I, § 4, cl. 1 (emphasis added).
the question is over the definition of "The Legislature thereof."
PA Court interpreted a state law in favor of collecting late ballots, which republicans claim is not contained within the strict language of the law.
If "The legislature thereof" is interpreted to mean only the legislature and not any court's interpretation, then the PA court could not have ordered the late ballots to be counted, as it was a "liberal" interpretation rather than strict interpretation of the law which required votes to be cast on election day, thus not received after.
Tbh, this lawsuit has a much larger implications than this election alone. If this ruling is overturned by the SC, that will set immediate precedent that state legislatures and only state legislatures may encode or interpret the law regarding elections. this favors republicans heavily as they control a ton of state governments.
the issue is, if the ballots were actually properly segregated, which I dont know, then it would mean that this specific attack would not change the results as they stand without some other fraud, since its only attacking those ballots received after the 3rd but postmarked "in time"
could be but needs to be added to the pile. there has to be a first source for this video, seems easy to find
do these people submit reports when they notice these irregularities? This affidavit was signed Nov 7 but alleges conduct on Nov 3rd. Shouldn't there be a contemporaneous report? Think that would make it a homerun since a statement made close to the event observed has much more weight.
isnt who these people voted for protected though? How does that work?
PA officials already ignored the supreme court...
I'm an attorney. This isn't a filing. There is no clerk timestamp. It appears to be a draft.
I also looked on the clerk's website and couldn't find any cases for these Plaintiffs. I wonder if it just hasn't been filed or uploaded by the clerk yet?
look for yourself
i cant even find either the colbeck or the mccall lawsuit in the clerk of courts. Not sure why they are not there.
why does the CIA want biden to win? what is going on
Lol thank you
Who is president biden you fag
I could use a hug
It has nothing to do with Trump losing or being a loser. First of all, he hasn’t lost. Secondly, he hasn’t conceded. How can he be a sore loser if he hasn’t lost nor conceded?
I donated $500
Holy shit you are a genius
Tell that to the people who were in the twin towers
You should fly double flags at double mast
it feels like christmas eve. I cant wait to open my presents from Sidney clause tomorrow morning!