26
Oodles 26 points ago +26 / -0

But how can that happen with such a huge percentage of current Republican politicians being such backstabbing RINO swamp rats?

2
Oodles 2 points ago +2 / -0

Registered Democrat here. And I alway attend our first in the country caucuses.

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is nuts. What are the odds of transmitting the virus to someone after you have been vaccinated and are wearing one mask?

2
Oodles 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is not getting enough press. False and misleading "science" is being used to scare Americans into doing anything the swamp wants us to do. This type of science misuse is truly terrifying.

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pepe makes an appearance in DC. Dems fear Pepe like they do not fear Bernie.

Unlike Pepe, Bernie will do whatever the DNC wants him to do.

Time to pick a new hero Bernie bros, preferably one with a spine this time.

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would like them to open the case back up, but who is going to do it? The Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches and the press and Big Tech are all now on the side of the FBI and CIA.

4
Oodles 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is their own personal party affiliation "Democrat"? Or is their party the CIA party and the Democrats are just the sheep that are much easier to herd?

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the in-depth response. Why aren't companies like Parler doing these things instead of putting their entire business in the hands of AWS?

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

A .45acp is not going to knock you back. It is not going to push you any harder than it pushes the person shooting it. I have put a .45acp out of a Glock 21 into a smaller whitetail and it did not even move. This "knock back" evidence not support false flag.

It is tough to tell the angles of the gun. He could have first been pointing at the men in the center window, then swiped it left to shoot the woman. This "angle" evidence neither supports nor disproves false flag.

She does seem to fall in a way that someone who was really not shot would fall to avoid injury. And there does seem to be a suspicious lack of blood, but people have died from gunshot wounds with less blood. This "controlled fall" and "lack of blood" evidence tends to support false flag.

But it is tough to tell either way from the video.

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah. That makes sense. Would the speaker's podium be a "national security asset"? I am just trying to get an idea of whether the DOJ is whining about a few hundred dollars of lost crap or actually some potential national security emergency.

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trying to base defamation damages on the possibility of being impeached seems foolhardy, especially with Lin Wood on the other side.

Because of the Streisand effect and the fact that damages would be nearly impossible to prove I do not foresee Roberts suing for defamation.

Roberts suing Lin Wood for defamation would be great for us, but horrible for Roberts; I just do not see him doing it.

1
Oodles 1 point ago +2 / -1

Is Roberts going to sue for defamation? That seems ridiculously unlikely. He has a job for life and I don't think he has any side gigs. What damages could he prove?

2
Oodles 2 points ago +2 / -0

In response to this threat, Newsmax should sue Smartmatic for declaratory judgment on this issue just to get Smartmatic's discovery responses regarding the truth about the election fraud.

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are the most important names being found on the list being collected and posted somewhere?

3
Oodles 3 points ago +3 / -0

"The public interest demands ending the abusive conduct that produced this dilemma."

1
Oodles 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am open to believing you.Just give me a reputable source that her net worth is anything remotely approaching $300M.

Iowa's Democrat Attorney General Tom Miller is the bad guy here, not Reynolds. She would be 100% in favor of backing Texas on this.

0
Oodles 0 points ago +1 / -1

Iowa pede here. Kim Reynolds is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but she is a loyal Trump supporter. I don't know exactly what her net worth is, but it is not even close to $300M. I suspect her net worth may even be less than average for a politician of her age and position.

She does deal with China, and that is bad, but Iowa sells 15% of its products to China, pocketing $15B/year. That is not good, but to try to stop the flow of $7.5B annually into a state with a population of only about 3 million people would be political suicide. Pro-Trump farmers would be the first in line to tar and feather her and run her out of town. It is not good, but it is not a problem of her making or under her control.

The reason Iowa has not joined the fight is because the person in charge of making that decision, Iowa's Attorney General, is a Democrat with a lot of political power. He actually tried to join the suit AGAINST Texas but Reynolds, unlike most governors, actually has negotiated for veto power over the AG's decision to join such suits and has vetoed his decision to fight against Texas.

I do not know what more she can do.

And if anyone has a reputable sauce on her net worth being anything approaching $300M, I would love to see it. It would definitely come as a massive shock to any Iowa I have ever met.

https://www.iowaattorneygeneral.gov/newsroom/miller-texas-election-lawsuit-amicus