4
OrangeElvis 4 points ago +4 / -0

To change the subject, took me a couple of seasons to realize the lead in The Expanse was WarrenPeace. Good TV show.

3
OrangeElvis 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have heard that while DDG doesn't collect your data, that as a corporation they are cucked. I would prefer to use a company that doesn't collect my data and is based - but if I must choose, I would rather they collect my data and give my business to a based company.

Any tech faggots on hear know of a based search engine?

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I always address your fallacious arguments before gracing you with my colorful expressions. You just gave up and took a dump. Pretty common, actually.

by Idiots
2
OrangeElvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

1) We take other with us.

2) Texas can pretty much subsist on its own. We are a net exporter, I believe, to the rest of the US.

3) I don't think it will happen - but it sends a clear signal of "FAFO".

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

....aaaaaan the naked ad hominem. Lol. Bye!

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your entire argument of whether American militias could successfully throw off corrupt tyranny is based upon uniforms.

Let's let that sink in.

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

SCOTUS does NOT disagree. SCOTUS did not deem it their job to review the evidence to even have an opinion. This is a HUGE fallacy - used by the left and the corrupt to obscufate the evidence. Almost ALL judiciary "losses" on this topic fall under this same issue.

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your mistake is confusing a rally/unarmed protest with an activated 2nd Amenment militia removing corrupt govt. There won't be "optics" anymore.

If that group on the 6th were there to remove Congress, they would have been removed. They weren't and the vast majority of violence was perpetrated by those other than Trump supporters.

Cut back on the methamphetamines and things may come more into focus. Most MAGA aren't frenetic spasmatcs who go on benders and freak out at midnight to burn scream and fling feces at the nearest authority figures.

7
OrangeElvis 7 points ago +7 / -0

That last part sounds like PR. Video and socialist media evidence is pretty clear, Sullivsn needs no help from his brother to incriminate himself.

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

ONE HUNDRED MILLION PEOPLE.

You think WHO is going to put on fake uniforms? What are these fake uniform people going to do? Fight the 100 million pissed off armed militia AND the police/military? Lol.

Lastly it isn't insurrection if it is against a corrupt govt.

You are all over the place and sound like an Antifa loon or a retard who got ahold of some meth (same thing now that I think about it).

28
OrangeElvis 28 points ago +29 / -1

I think you have this exactly backwards, fren.

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

2nd Amendment activation = citizens removing corrupt govt officials. If there is any resistance to armed civilian (plain clothes) militias, it will be people in uniforms.

Q: why do soldiers and officers wear uniforms to begin with?

I am having a hard time figuring out what is confusing you here. Are you blind from birth by any chance?

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I keep asking: what would happen if all of a sudden, the FBI and DOJ started doing their job? Timing is interesting...

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is retarded. You suggesting our elected officials are going to "face off"? They will be the only enemies in a 2nd amendment situation. Police and soldiers gonna operate in street clothes? That will work well.

If we go full Revolutionary War 2.0, our soldiers and police officers will have their hands full keeping the peace outside of battles and protecting us from our foreign enemies during the turmoil.

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I read it to, and did it not say they promised to protect us from enemies both foreign and domestic?

The evidence is overwhelming that five states should not have certified electors. FACT.

That is just the obvious, unclassified shit citizens have found. If the military has intelligence of more that proves Trump won, you still expect them to stand down? They would literally be violating their oaths.

"Muh Russia!" had no evidence - actually, there was evidence - evidence it was a coup attempt against Trump. The two situations are not in the same solar system.

Optics could be bad - that much is true. However optics aren't a deal breaker when the literal Republic is on the line. Besides that, it may not come to that. FEMA, Homeland Security and the Nat'l Guard may get it done - we shall see.

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most importantly, need leadership. With that said, ow good do your plans need to be when you outnumber your opponent 1,000 to 1?

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +2 / -1

What other countries in your argument had a 2nd amendment and who's population owned the majority of guns and ammo IN THE WORLD?

Until we let them take our guns, the American people are the greatest army the world has ever seen - with home field advantage of every square mile.

6
OrangeElvis 6 points ago +7 / -1

The left STILL cannot meme. Fing terrible.

2
OrangeElvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are entitled to your opinion but not your own facts. There is no precedent in US history of systemic treason in our govt that led to foreign subversion of our election.

They would derelict of their duty to uphold the Constitution from enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC. Read joint chiefs of staff letter again if you must.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›