I used to think claims like yours were insane neo-nazi bullshit, but once I dared to start looking into this territory about a year ago I've been profoundly freaked out by how much legitimacy there seems to be in the 'alternative history' realm.
This big topic needs massive attention and investigation, to sort out what is legit and what isn't, but notice how nobody is allowed to come within a million miles of discussing and exploring the topic at all.
Even someone like me, who doesn't even really have a dog in the fight, is considered hateful and 'anti-semitic' even for just wanting discussion and investigation and clarification.
This is totally unacceptable.
And then combine that with the insanely high over-representation of Jews in the world of 'cultural marxism', mainstream media, social media, Hollywood, universities, socialism, the radical left, gun-control, etc. etc. etc., where most of the leftist anti-American propaganda flows from.
And once again it's 'anti-semitic' to even point that out.
There's a 2020 documentary called "Kill Chain" that goes into great detail about how absurdly fucked up and vulnerable and untrustworthy all of the Dominion voting machines are.
Ironically it's a lefty documentary trying to make the GOP the badguys, as if 2016 was stolen by Russians, but either way it makes a crushingly strong case that the voting machines are a total nightmare and 10000% unreliable.
Funny how the left was screaming about those machines before, but now, after the 2020 outcome, if you doubt the outcome you're a THREAT TO DEMOCRACY!!1!
Do you really think that a right-wing voter would actually withhold their vote over a rescheduling for medical marijuana, when they would all know that's effectively a vote for Biden?
I just can't imagine that, with all the riots and covid insanity of 2020. It's hard to imagine anyone making that decision.
Or I suppose there could be a few, but at the same time then for every one right-wing vote lost I think there'd be at least 1 or maybe even 10 gained from the center or even moderate left.
One of the biggest let-downs for me by Trump was him not fixing this federal marijuana bullshit.
It only needs to be 'rescheduled' from 1 to 2. That's doable by a president via executive power through DEA channels. It doesn't have to go through Congress.
He said during the 2016 campaign that he was totally in favor of legalizing medical. He had 4 years and did nothing. I would really like an explanation from him regarding that.
(And it seemed like a blunder to not gain all the more supporters by doing something so socially popular like that.)
I hate to say it, but as institutions are forced to put more and more 'people of color' into positions of power, when they are undeserving yet recipients of affirmative-action, more and more of those people will wield their discretion to enforce rules/policies in a racist anti-white manner...out of revenge, especially due to all the conditioning they are saturated by from all the mainstream propaganda.
We've had a substantial enough problem over the decades with whites exercising their discretion and authority in a racist manner, because humans are flawed, but 'we aint seen nothin yet' when it comes to that same human flaw going in the other direction. Especially when our cultish society will pounce on even the slightest whiff of racism coming from whites yet practically celebrates blatant racism when it comes from blacks/latinos.
We are already in a cold-war version of a race-war, and it's likely only going to get worse. A fundamental problem is that most whites are in denial that they are at war.
(And I'm no 'white nationalist' saying this stuff. Hell, I voted for Obama both times. But this new clown-world has definitely forced me into becoming an "identitarian". It's insane and suicidal to not wake up, at this point.)
US white is 1.7, but I no longer have the link. Ann Coulter brought that up in the mainstream media a few years back, showing that white homicide in the US was basically the same as several EU countries.
But the Finland/Austria stuff is bullshit. No supporting data shows rates that high. The worst in western Europe are about the same as white America.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
So many people claim this website is trash, and it sucks when posts like this make us all look bad.
What is the value of what you just linked? All it shows is that the 2018 rate for Finland was 1.7, which is even lower than what I said.
What am I missing?
Seems like you're just throwing out a link as a bluff, assuming nobody is going to bother to check it.
Please show something that shows that Finland's rate is anywhere near 3.3, otherwise this is just bullshit propaganda that makes us look like ignorant and gullible assholes.
here are legit stats for 2019 and 2020 and they show the rate at 1.7 - 1.8
"You have to prove, or at least make the argument that if blacks were in the same position back then, they wouldn't have done the same thing...You will NEVER convince me of that, and I would wager that, a considerable percentage of them would be willing to implement slavery, TODAY, if given the opportunity."
Look at what's happening in recent years to rural white farmers in South Africa. Says a lot.
The stats are bogus. This is a shitty post that makes us look stupid.
The overall message is true, in that firearms crimes in the US are outrageously overrepresented with black Americans, but those #'s are just bullshit.
To be fair, I think those Finland stats are bogus. Finland's total homicide rate (not just guns) is only 1.8.
False stuff like this makes us look like idiots who buy into whatever propaganda we prefer while accusing the other side of doing exactly that. I'd prefer to be on the side with integrity.
EDIT: here are legit stats for finland for 2020, for example, showing a rate of 1.7 rather than the goofy 3.3 of OP's chart:
https://yle.fi/uutiset/osasto/news/homicides_in_finland_up_by_a_quarter_in_2020/11743935
Listen to this recent interview Stefan Molyneux did with a rural white farmer in South Africa. It's heart-breaking. They've got 'end times' conditions totally normalized over there and nobody around the world has any idea or cares.
https://www.freedomain.com/all-podcasts/#/4771/life-and-death-in-south-africa-freedomain-call-in
Very similar to the technique of "That's anti-Semitic!!", such that we're not allowed to question the ultra-suspicious patterns and behaviors going on with Marxist anti-American Jews.
I agree with your sentiment, and I'm not a libertarian at all, but there is no monopoly in social media platforms, nor is there in credit card services, nor in banking.
'Monopoly' means something specific, and those conditions just aren't met in any of these instances.
So they are simply out-competing us, and we are lazily feeding our time and money into their leftist institutions, then bitching about it afterward like children.
There is nothing stopping other/new institutions from offering alternative freedom-honoring banking, credit, and social media, and there's nothing stopping We The People from exclusively supporting those institutions and boycotting their leftist versions.
That's a free market in a free country, and we are not utilizing that freedom.
Sadly, if we continue to behave in such a weak and childish manner, we effectively 'deserve' to lose. That's simply survival of the fittest, and the left is demonstrating fitness that is superior.
This is why Trump is on the verge of creating his own platforms. He understands it.
Propertarianism has some genius-level ideas for enhancing our laws so that they can't get gamed with fuckery so badly and easily.
Curt Doolittle is a brilliant guy.
As I understand it, the worry could likely have been that if he doubled-down on that messaging, he could have been successfully impeached, which then loses his lifestyle Secret Service protection, which them leaves him and his family exposed to assassins for the rest of their lives w/o protection in a world where half the country thinks he's Hitler and should be murdered.
State lines are woefully inadequate. It should be more like the 2016 electoral map. It's WAY more urban-vs-rural than state lines. Look at Oregon in 2016. 2 cities/counties dominated an otherwise-deeply-red state.
Trump should have declared a state of emergency, on his way out. He should have spoken to the nation (and the world) in the big picture, explaining what had happened.
He should have said that the only civic-duty 'permission' Biden would have to end that state of emergency would be by addressing these electoral integrity issues.
So when he would fail to do that, yet cancel the emergency anyway, it would make the statement that the system has failed and is accepting the corruption of our heart and soul, and thusly America now has permission to fight back.
I think that would have been an epic gesture that would have painted Biden into a corner. Not necessarily legally but the optics would have been enormously powerful. Especially if Trump worded it in such a way that was saying he can only go along with the transfer of power so long as those issues get resolved. That he's effectively putting his trust in the system to use the transfer to fix itself. As in, if it doesn't, he did not agree to conceded under those terms.
That would be 'founding-fathers'-scale leadership. Like openly declaring that we are on the brink, and this is the line in the sand, but we're going to let the system first have the opportunity to correct itself. That way he could leave office yet not really just surrender.
I don't see it that way. The right simply failed to provide any good alternative platforms. It's a free market and any groups or individuals could have offered free speech platforms, or decent news organizations.
Trump's new plan is proving that, but it's way too late, except hopefully in the bigger picture and long run.
Political views are not a protected class, so those banks and youtube etc are free to boot people off their services. That's a free country. But we were all so dumb as to funnel all our time and support into organizations that we knew were hard-left to begin with. That makes us the fools way more than it makes them rights-violators.
Boulder area is extremely left-wing. Likely that nobody was carrying. Similar to that shooting in Texas where it was down near the border in an extremely blue area, where likely nobody was carrying.
The best work that I'm finding regarding a rational and fair analysis of those trends/patterns, is by Curt Doolittle's Propertarianism.
It's not 'neo-nazi' 'hate' or anything like that. More like cold brutal social-science.
He makes an extremely compelling case.
Curt Doolittle's Propertarian work is pretty brilliant in mapping out these patterns and motivations.
How is what I said biased or misleading?
I'm pointing out why we are LOSING and losing BADLY.
It is a fact that society has now officially normalized the distinction between psychological "gender" and biological sex.
It doesn't really matter if any of us disagree with that, in terms of the debate that society is having. We've lost that, and it is now the new normal. In schools, in the media, in universities, in Hollywood, in government, in workplaces, in big-tech social media, in corporate America, etc. etc. etc.
So if we just double down, in denial of this new label, we look like assholes and it makes it easy for all of the leftist propaganda to point how how 'hAtEfUL' and 'pHObiC' we are. That propaganda works and we have demonstrated zero ability to stop it.
Do we want to just sit here and gripe, on one little website that nobody really cares about in the big picture, or do we maybe want to NOT allow the real world to continue to turn to shit...
Our social/political strategies with all of these struggles are downright moronic, and we continue to lose and lose and lose.
We might want to get our shit together and change that.
It is partly our fault. If we'd said that we recognize that there are a lot of people with this disorder and that the label "gender identity" can refer, for them, to their psychological perception of their psychological identity, which is distinct from their biological sex, we would sound reasonable and compassionate. We can say we don't agree that a "gender identity" makes someone a "real woman" or a "real man" as if there is no meaningful distinction between gender-identity and biological-sex. So we don't have to agree with their crazy shit. But in our approach to the difficult topic we could have at least come off as reasonable and compassionate.
Then we'd have a reasonable and compassionate voice in the debate over locker rooms and girls sports and whether or not we can be fired/banned for 'mis-gendering'.
But we've acted like trollish assholes, which has gotten ourselves excluded from the broader debate, which has allowed this deranged insanity to win the debate on all fronts. The world is now changing fast, into clown world, and we're not there to stop it because acting like assholes got us excluded from the debate in the first place. The left doesn't have to listen to any of our debunkings because they can merely point out how 'bigoted' and 'hateful' we are, and that's the end of it. That is working. They are winning. We are relegated to this little website here, with griping and memes, while the rest of the world moves on without us. We are losing on a catastrophic scale and there are zero signs of that changing.
That's not the issue. The issue is that the majority of society now agrees that there are many people for whom there is a distinction between psychological 'gender' and biological sex. And the label for that distinction is now officially called "gender identity". It's not a matter of whether it's true or not. It's a matter of recognizing that society now makes that distinction. Refusing to acknowledge that distinction makes us look like closed-minded bigots, and the meme above makes us look like closed-minded bigoted trolls. We are catastrophically losing the societal debate because we come off as bigots and trolls. It's getting us nowhere. It's harming us severely.
None of that really means anything solid, decades after the fact, because it's all a matter of interpretation going back decades into a time of chaos. I too have been to multiple camps in europe, including buchenwald. Nobody respectable in the alt-history realm is disputing there were camps. Familiarize yourself with the ACTUAL alternative history claims being discussed, not the bullshit you're being told. It's too likely you're buying into the propaganda that anyone who questions the official story is claiming that the nazis were wonderful and there were no camps at all, etc. It's much more of a matter of what exactly were the camps for, what exactly happened at them, where/why did most jew deaths occur. And on and on. Notice how there are countless points made by the alt crowd that the mainstream crowd can's answer and refuses to debate. Instead they just scream 'hate speech' and 'anti-semitism'. That's not ethical and is obviously suspicious as all hell.
The mainstream narrative for WW2 seems to be the same kind of propaganda that insists to this day that Trump incited an insurrection and called all mexicans rapists and refused to disavow the white nationalists in virginia. Leftists just buy into it without question because they want it to be true. Don't do your own version of that. Dare to break out of that and look for yourself.
Question these narratives rather than just swallowing them. And question the narratives regarding what the alternative-history narratives are.
Question why it is utterly illegal in germany for scholars and historians to even discuss these things. They have put totally decent and well-researched people into prison simply for discussion. That is unacceptably unprincipled. The truth can withstand scrutiny whereas lies need to be protected by criminalizing scrutiny.
I'm not pro-nazi in the least, and I don't deny that many jews died. I'm saying that the more I look at the forbidden information, which nobody will openly allow discussion of, the bulk of the mainstream narratives of what happened to jews by nazis during WW2 is deeply skewed and false. It's the same kind of bullshit that we are now seeing about America's history and the founding fathers and Trump and capitalism, etc. 1619 project, critical race theory, etc. Society is swallowing bullshit narratives about what has happened in the world, and WW2 is just one topic that has been twisted very very badly.