87
PNW_PEPE 87 points ago +88 / -1

when a senator literally quotes CNN headlines as part of their defense, we have a real problem... how the hell do these people get into office at all

4
PNW_PEPE 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, our hands are tied here. She is the lesser of two evils. People need to understand this.

2
PNW_PEPE 2 points ago +2 / -0

I bet at least 70% of the U.S population thought he said the word bleach. The media has so much power. I hate commies.

2
PNW_PEPE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol who knows. Ron Raffensperger looks more like Brad than anyone else I have come across. Just ate too much Chinese food over there

3
PNW_PEPE 3 points ago +3 / -0

You could tell her she has obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Also known as Pickwickian syndrome. The medical truth about hambeasts is their fatness literally prevents their lungs from expanding.

Calling fatties pickwickians is my slang

2
PNW_PEPE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh yeah. The 3 sister assumption comes from here in the GPB "fact check":

"The secretary of state's office said at the time that Raffensperger did not have a brother named Ron and had two sisters. Raffensperger also has another sister and a brother — also not named Ron — who are private civilians"

I call bullshit. Who is the third sister after Gwen and Jody?

27
PNW_PEPE 27 points ago +27 / -0

Trump never actually said the word "bleach" -- he said "disinfectant" -- bleach is a disinfectant, yes, but disinfectants are a range of chemicals -- including quats (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary_ammonium_cation) which are antibacterial including against enveloped viruses (COVID is an enveloped virus).

I don't think Trump is the most scientific with his words. Maybe he meant disinfectant, maybe he meant antiseptic instead, a very similar term, also used for antibiotics/antivirals, those include quinolines which includes hydroxychloroquine. Personally, when I watched that clip, I did not think he was suggesting bleach, it sounded like he was suggesting strong IV antivirals / antibiotics. MSM says "oh of course he meant bleach!" yet they fail to acknowledge that simple manipulation of words can lead you to very reasonable suggestions, or in their case, very unreasonable suggestions. It's ridiculous the games people play with words to fit their narrative.

Here's the clip again in case you want to rewatch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zicGxU5MfwE

10
PNW_PEPE 10 points ago +10 / -0

All I'm saying is, this group has solidified the question we all had in our minds with day 1 of the election. Why were vote switches happening on live TV? Either it was direct human error (requires investigation for fraud) or it was programmed switching (also requires investigation for fraud). The data itself being transmitted was erroneous, you cannot possibly take away votes from a candidate... This happened to both candidates multiple times. The "accidental" direct switches from one candidate to another are weird too.

Absolutely no one has attempted to answer this fundamental question. This should be our primary focus. Prove to me that the 13K vote switch in Georgia was some kind of legit clerical error, along with every single other one of them in all the other states. No one has.

Who cares what the data says on TV if the data is crap. I just read a "Reuters fact check" on live vote switching on TV. Their explanation? Well Chris Krebs said it was secure, so it must be. Oh yeah, and they poke holes that it was a clip from 2019 not 2020 (irrelevant and once again ignores the fact that fraud likely existed then [thus is likely to exist now also], and the exact same type of vote switches are seen in a ton of states in the presidential race).

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cnn-not-evidence-vote-fraud/fact-check-tv-news-clip-does-not-show-live-computerized-fraud-on-election-day-2020-idUSKBN27P2TI

6
PNW_PEPE 6 points ago +6 / -0

What does he mean by #3? I watched the hearing yesterday, I didn't see anything about them decertifying.

4
PNW_PEPE 4 points ago +6 / -2

Thank you for mentioning this. People have gotten very caught up with what Jovan said and it doesn't seem like the right angle to me. Your testimony was very compelling and I don't see how any reasonable person wouldn't want to investigate.

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol I can't even watch TV anymore, it's so boring compared to this. Trump ruined the entertainment industry by exposing reality

171
PNW_PEPE 171 points ago +173 / -2

lmao can you fucking imagine if they brought out epstein in cuffs. The entire world would lose their shit

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s his brothers name? If it isn’t Ron, what is it?

7
PNW_PEPE 7 points ago +7 / -0

Heart attack FOLLOWING a PROCEDURE related to COVID. He could’ve been murdered in the OR or intentionally killed at the bedside under anesthesia.

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will be hosting fren zones every day at 7 PM PST :) feel free to stop in, frens

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hahahaha my classmates do that shit and it drives me up the wall. I don’t have tiktok or Snapchat or anything, that’s why I come here. I wish social media trend bullshit would just go away

2
PNW_PEPE 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds good to me! Thanks fren

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m in medical school.. currently in our endocrinology unit

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just finished studying for the day. Sup?

1
PNW_PEPE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who knows what this means, but sounds good to me! :)

Nothing can stop what is coming.

-1
PNW_PEPE -1 points ago +1 / -2

I get that. He's saying it at the hearing. But he isn't under oath or anything. He could just be blowing smoke. While I hope he isn't, him just saying this doesn't give us anything and isn't going to convince any court. He needs to show proof that he is actually inside the network besides just his word at an opportune moment.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›