8
PatLash 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is right. It's all about culture at every level. One man can influence a lot but there's generations of leftist rot we need to fight against and that's not overnight. We must all do our part.

6
PatLash 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wow Cory Booker gained weight

4
PatLash 4 points ago +4 / -0

By that logic fucking every news organization should be arrested for the "sources" they report about. What a fucking pussy clown.

3
PatLash 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup. It's the only excuse that's viable, really. And they point to the congressional races as a supporting argument -- i.e. "clearly people didn't like Trump nor Democrats"

6
PatLash 6 points ago +6 / -0

you could litterally have joe biden rpaing children in broad daylight in front of a crowd of 10.000.000 people who sign affidvaits they witnessed and saw it and have video evidence!

Yup....we are in such a battleground of information warfare with cucked news and tech and post-truth bullshit (this is what the kind of shit like 27 genders gets you) that any approach, no matter the evidence, was going to be a dirty slog. You could have forensically verified emails and confessions of fraud by election officials and the tech-media complex would cover for it.

11
PatLash 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yeah, I think he anticipated that concern with the official statement. In particular: "Arizona wasn't named in this lawsuit because our office successfully prevented many of the same troubling and last-minute changes to our state's election integrity laws."

The word choice is interesting..."successfully prevented" suggests there were attempts to do so and it was stopped.

16
PatLash 16 points ago +17 / -1

What’s the context here?

8
PatLash 8 points ago +8 / -0

I know we are frustrated with Fox news but this is a good sign. Any attention to this is good. Much preferred to "news" sources ignoring it just saying "no evidence, nothing to see here" as they try psy-op Biden as legitimate.

3
PatLash 3 points ago +3 / -0

Part of me is grateful that it's so blatant. Makes for an easier case.

by Korec
1
PatLash 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they're going to repeat this with a larger sample size?

5
PatLash 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s the maddening thing. The implication of a throwaway statement like “there is no evidence“ is that if there were evidence we would’ve heard of it. But the media won’t cover it so people don’t hear of it. And they’ve committed to it so it’s easier to simply ignore and double-down. It’s completely circular.

3
PatLash 3 points ago +3 / -0

We spent millions of taxpayer money investigating the Russia hoax and what has this fat troll done?

1
PatLash 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know what's weird is I hardly see anyone talking about Biden "winning" -- it's like they know something about it is fishy but they're just laying low and hoping it will blow over

1
PatLash 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who do you think it was that caused the shift?

view more: Next ›