2
PatriotLady1 2 points ago +2 / -0

too good not to share....LMAO

26
PatriotLady1 26 points ago +26 / -0

HE HAD CANCER.....but sure, they "list" his COD as the coof....

bastards !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1
PatriotLady1 1 point ago +1 / -0

**BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

SIMPLY BRILLIANT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!**

1
PatriotLady1 1 point ago +1 / -0

GGGGGGGGGGGGGENIUS in full display

1
PatriotLady1 1 point ago +1 / -0

**SOOOOOO CREATIVE and effective "passive agressiveness" in action...

our compliments fren**

1
PatriotLady1 1 point ago +1 / -0

WOW...............WELL SAID !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1
PatriotLady1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Federal Criminal Penalty for Violation of Oath of Office

Federal criminal law is explicit and direct regarding a violation of oath of office by federal officials which includes all members of Congress. The law requires the removal of the office holder as well a prison term or fine for the offender.

18 U.S.C. 1918:

“Whoever violates the provisions of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government [and] shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day or both.”

5 U.S.C. 7311 (1):

“An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States of the government of the District of Columbia if he (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government…”

**Advocate advocate: To plead in favor of : defend by argument before a tribunal or the public : support or recommend publicly. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary

Advocate: To speak in favor of or defend by argument. To support, vindicate, or recommend publicly. Black’s Law Dictionary

PRETTY SURE MYORKAS IS "ADVOCATING" TO DISOBEY THE LAWS HE HAS SWORN AN OATH TO PROTECT,,, **

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

1
PatriotLady1 1 point ago +1 / -0

SO WHAT WAS THE "PREDICATE CRIME" that they allege????

**Highlights of Amendment IV

Protection against unreasonable search and seizure
Protection against having warrants issued against you without probably cause (justifiable reason).

**

2
PatriotLady1 2 points ago +2 / -0

#45's EPIC TRUTHS just keep coming out...

BLATANTLY EXPOSING THE CORRUPTION OF THE SWAMPSTERS

4
PatriotLady1 4 points ago +4 / -0

sorry about posting newsmax...but it actually HAS the story:

https://www.newsmax.com/us/california-appeals-court-unconstitutional-lockdowns/2022/01/20/id/1053336/

Officials in Los Angeles and Ventura counties had separately won lower court decisions saying gun stores were not exempt from broader shutdown orders aimed at limiting the spread of the coronavirus early in the pandemic.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected both lower court rulings.

The Second Amendment "means nothing if the government can prohibit all persons from acquiring any firearm or ammunition," Judge Lawrence VanDyke wrote. "But that's what happened in this case."

Because buyers can obtain guns only by personally going to gun stores in California, Ventura County's 48-day closure of gun shops, ammunition shops and firing ranges "wholly prevented law-abiding citizens in the County from realizing their right to keep and bear arms," he wrote.

This, he noted, while bike shops were among those allowed to remain open as essential businesses. The panel adopted the same reasoning in the Los Angeles County case, though the closure there was for 11 days.

The decision holds that governments "cannot use a crisis to trample on the Constitutional rights of citizens," said Michael Jean, director of the National Rifle Association's Office of Litigation Counsel that sued in the Los Angeles County case. It also sued Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties over their restrictions in Northern California, but the last three were dismissed from the lawsuit when they repealed their orders.

Similar restrictions were imposed in 10 other states, according to the Firearms Policy Coalition, another gun owners' rights groups that sued: Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia.

Three gun-owner rights groups and several individuals and businesses had sought to overturn the lower court rulings in California.

Ventura County "believes the case was correctly decided at the District Court level and is disappointed with the three-judge panel's decision," county spokeswoman Ashley Bautista said in an email. Officials are reviewing the decision and "evaluating our options and next steps."

3
PatriotLady1 3 points ago +3 / -0

DESERVES A NEW STICKER THAT SAYS...."I did that" with Biden pointing towards the coffins....

LET'S GO BRANDON ......reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

8
PatriotLady1 8 points ago +8 / -0

you KNOW "PROBING" is exactly WHAT THE DEM'S ARE DOING... Long live ELECTION INTEGRITY LAWS !!!!!!!!!!!!

1
PatriotLady1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they are MENNONITES 'cause they have "allowances" to some modern "stuff"... I just re-posted this snapshot from elsewhere

2
PatriotLady1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Carhartt Will Continue to Enforce Employee Vaccine Mandate in the Wake of SCOTUS’ Ruling....

Outdoor outfitter Carhartt will require its employees to get vaccinated against the Wuhan coronavirus. This comes after the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) blocked President Biden’s mandate directing private companies with 100 or more employees to require their workforce to be vaccinated.

The announcement was made via an email sent to employees on Jan. 14 from Carhartt CEO Mark Valade. An image of the email circulated on Twitter. https://twitter.com/stclairashley/status/1483461227791757325?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1483461227791757325%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fmadelineleesman%2F2022%2F01%2F18%2Fcarhartt-will-continue-to-enforce-employee-vaccine-mandate-in-the-wake-of-scotus-n2601993

HERE'S THE CEO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (he needs to hear from REAL AMERICAN PATRIOTS): [email protected]

1
PatriotLady1 1 point ago +1 / -0

WHAT COLLOSAL B.S.

WHERE'S THE "immunity" FOR THE JAN. 6-ERS...who were "welcomed in" to the Capitol Bldg BY THE COPS?

view more: Next ›