17
PedeElect 17 points ago +17 / -0

It is heartbreaking to hear people being put through these hardships due to the experimental whims of politicians who bear none of the downside whatsoever.

And then to hear it ignored by the media adds salt to the wound.

I admire your positive attitude Pede, I wish there was a way for me to help, however I am confident a Pede better positioned will come through.

Darkest before the dawn Pede.

by HunterB
3
PedeElect 3 points ago +3 / -0

So I learned about roaches, I learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I love kids jumping on my lap.

by HunterB
6
PedeElect 6 points ago +6 / -0

Worst part is she isn't even hot...

by Bullelk
1
PedeElect 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is GG if true - but why didn't the discrepancies show in the hand recount?

5
PedeElect 5 points ago +5 / -0

Spot on.

Completely incapable of controlling her emotions. Total wreck.

4
PedeElect 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL!

Good find Pede.

Her voice sounds like a rusty violin.

10
PedeElect 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is almost certainly a catfish. Beware PEDES.

1
PedeElect 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will take out one of the black poll workers from the GA video today and blame it on republicans/us as a right wing hate crime.

Two birds with one stone, clean up a loose end and start riots again to scare state legislatures/SCOTUS from addressing the fraud.

That is my guess.

2
PedeElect 2 points ago +2 / -0

Woahhhhh good find Pede!

That guy walked over at the exact moment to obstruct the view of the press. He was in on the scheme.

2
PedeElect 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was at this moment that I knew we won.

Thank you for pulling this clip Pede.

God's work!

Absolutely hilarious.

14
PedeElect 14 points ago +14 / -0

I can't remember where I saw it, but something ridiculous like 30% of Twitter activity is estimated to be bots. They are incredibly sophisticated.

I noticed a lot of it during the election, they were deployed to rile conservatives up and stoke left vs right tensions.

The intensity of the division in the US at the moment is largely a product of extremely sophisticated bot operations.

7
PedeElect 7 points ago +7 / -0

I can't find anything about this - do you have a source?

Very interesting if true.

7
PedeElect 7 points ago +7 / -0

Aus Pedes need to get their guns back - reject leftist Europolitics, tell the commies to GET FUCKED

3
PedeElect 3 points ago +3 / -0

^ was used by the data analytics team I believe, was also used by Vertias for the USPS whistleblower.

100% recommend using this over GoFundMe.

2
PedeElect 2 points ago +2 / -0

There does not appear to be one beyond both being subsidiaries of the same bank.

I think people have fucked this one up.

2
PedeElect 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand Sec 230 well, but does this not encourage more censorship by making them liable for their users' posts?

And what does this mean for honest companies like Parler that are facilitating free speech?

1
PedeElect 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where does it say that it was created with the specific purpose of engaging in the Chinese JV?

From their own site it appears to be a regular US subsidiary

https://www.ubs.com/locations/united-states/new-york/1285-avenue-of-the-americas/ubs-securities-llc-562.html

There are 'UBS Securities' subsidiaries all over the world, such as this one in India:

https://www.ubs.com/global/en/investment-bank/ubss-india-private-limited.html

But most importantly their FINRA information shows nothing suggesting they are owned by the Chinese govt.

https://brokercheck.finra.org/firm/summary/7654

Most importantly they have SEC filings going back well before the Chinese JV.

https://sec.report/CIK/0000230611?

The only entity that I see that is CCP-owned is the JV in China, but that is not the one making the transaction as per Dominion's own SEC filing.

I don't want to be right on this, but it seems pretty amateur hour to get this confused.

1
PedeElect 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course Pede!

It's absolutely possible that the transaction is linked to the Chinese entity, and has been routed through the US. However the evidence I have seen so far does not explicitly show that. So we should be careful.

1
PedeElect 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could be misinterpreting, however that appears to be saying that although they (the international entity) have a minority stake, UBS have been able to maintain management control of the Chinese UBS Securities entity.

Where are you seeing that UBS Securities LLC is the American arm of UBS Securities Co Ltd? I am seeing it as the other way around.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›