3
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 3 points ago +3 / -0

"We prepared for events like this by never relying on amazons proprietary infrastructure and building bare metal products"

"There is a possibility Parler will be unavailable on the internet for up to a week as we rebuild from scratch"

In other words, they relied on Amazon's proprietary infrastructure instead of building a bare metal product and had never even considered what they'd do if this happened.

Stevie Wonder could have seen this coming. Next they're going to be like "Ooops, some rogue Amazon AWS employee stole our phone number database, sucks lol"

6
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 6 points ago +6 / -0

More like "we made an account, posted it and sourced ourselves."

1
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those of you who do this - just be mentally prepared to be arrested as well. You'll may be detained for false imprisonment and will have to wait to see a judge. Given it's DC.. well..

53
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 53 points ago +54 / -1

I am so glad you posted this. I was thinking this exact thing when I heard that news. If they can turn down money, they shouldn't be receiving any aid. That's literally the entire point of aid.

1
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the IN-surrection not RE-surrection. But my initial point still stands - no need to spam it.

2
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 2 points ago +3 / -1

Stop spamming this bullshit on every thread. The "resurrection act" isn't even a thing.

3
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 3 points ago +3 / -0

It sucks when you see folks like James retweeting shit they could easily verify as false. With as smart as he is he'd probably be the first to say a little due dilligence never hurt anyone.

2
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I've seen sources!"

doesn't post said sources

1
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Without a search function and being on 24/7 clicking on every thread , there's no way you could realistically make this work.

4
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 4 points ago +4 / -0

besuretodrinkyourovaltine

But seriously, it'd be nice to know what it says and/or if there is any significance of them posting these two things in tandem. It's a gingerbread contest and only one of the entries looks like a gingerbread house.

by geewiz
1
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're missing the joke. If you know you're rights were being violated = you pass.

If you realistically think a test wouldn't be cheated and completely abused, you're even more retarded than me.

by geewiz
15
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 15 points ago +15 / -0

The only correct answer would be to reject the test and say you're violating my constitutionally protected voting rights by requiring me to pass a basic civics test in order to vote.

2
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a show on Amazon called "Utopia" - surprisingly good. Worth the full season binge watch.

2
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think I remember this scene in Demolition Man...

1
PelosisPetrifiedPuss 1 point ago +1 / -0

And if you listen to how he presents it, it's even funnier. He says that it was developed by a "team of scientists lead by Dr. Barney Graham" and calls this lady a "close colleague" while stumbling to sound out/read out her name for the first time ever.

view more: Next ›