7
PepeFarmsRemembers 7 points ago +7 / -0

"While Dr Oz failed to convince her otherwise, Wendy eventually backtracked and complied with the vaccination.

In May 2021, she also announced that her live studio audience will only be allowed to return if they were fully vaccinated."

re: https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/3678944/wendy-williams-vaccine-covid-19/

10
PepeFarmsRemembers 10 points ago +10 / -0

Micro clot brain damage no doubt....

11
PepeFarmsRemembers 11 points ago +11 / -0

While Dr Oz failed to convince her otherwise, Wendy eventually backtracked and complied with the vaccination.

In May 2021, she also announced that her live studio audience will only be allowed to return if they were fully vaccinated.

re: https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/3678944/wendy-williams-vaccine-covid-19/

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jabbed: "...While Dr Oz failed to convince her otherwise, Wendy eventually backtracked and complied with the vaccination.

In May 2021, she also announced that her live studio audience will only be allowed to return if they were fully vaccinated."

re: https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/3678944/wendy-williams-vaccine-covid-19/

7
PepeFarmsRemembers 7 points ago +8 / -1

Yes. Home owner was quoted saying the vehicle drove through the yard and then stopped in driveway. Sounds like they came in thorough the back.

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

In 1976, the chief executive of Merck told Fortune magazine that he dreamed of marketing drugs the way Wrigley’s markets chewing gum: to as large a market as possible.

http://www.thehealthculture.com/2008/11/selling-drugs-like-chewing-gum/

3
PepeFarmsRemembers 3 points ago +3 / -0

First 6 pages, all the ones covering self defense.

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

IMHO a person can not retain strict integrity, demonstrate tried integrity, or be incorruptible if, for example, that person declares a man in a dress is a woman.

The "sense" referred to here is not what the subject feels about themselves.

"...sense of probity." = [A meaning conveyed or intended] of [integrity, honesty, and incorruptibility].

8
PepeFarmsRemembers 8 points ago +9 / -1

As mentioned by Winner 45 the occupant did not have a history of attacking first responders, a previous tenant did. This is a case of government / police incompetence and indifference.

Remember: As per SCOTUS the police have no duty to protect you or save your life. Their donuts were more important than saving that man.

2
PepeFarmsRemembers 2 points ago +2 / -0

The RDA for D was set in WWII at a level just high enough to prevent death/severe illness. Dr. Ouchie himself claims to take 8000iu a day or more during flu season.

2
PepeFarmsRemembers 2 points ago +2 / -0

The tetanus jab is a "toxoid" but the CDC says "Tetanus is an infection caused by Clostridium tetani bacteria, which is also referred to as lockjaw. There are four kinds of vaccines used today to protect against tetanus, all of which are combined with vaccines for other diseases.
Diphtheria and tetanus (DT) vaccines
Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTaP) vaccines
Tetanus and diphtheria (Td) vaccines
Tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) vaccines"

So who knows what is actually in it... re: https://web.archive.org/web/20210419234222/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/tetanus/index.html

4
PepeFarmsRemembers 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, sorry I meant to leave that as placeholder. You are correct, the new shingles vax is a GMO (gene splicing aka recombinant) with a mystery adjuvant derived from the Salmonella Minnesota lipopolysaccharide.

So it is spike protein injection, not mRNA. Got it. lol

4
PepeFarmsRemembers 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doctors and pharmacies started pushing the new mRNA shingles vaccine a few years ago, claiming that 1 in 4 adults will express shingles. Out of all the adults I know (100's) only 1 has ever had issues with shingles and no vaccine has ever prevented it (the "old style killed virus" or the new mRNA one).

8
PepeFarmsRemembers 8 points ago +8 / -0

FYI Tetanus shots are anti-toxin not a vaccine. The human body has no trouble fighting off a tetanus infection, but the toxins the tetanus bacterium releases into the blood stream will kill you faster than your body can kill the bacteria.

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, even a fake vax card. This control group card is fine and a fake jab card is fine as long as it doesn't resemble the "official" card and especially doesn't have a copy of a Fed seal. The BS about "could be putting others at risk" is just intimidation.

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, but this card is specifically not illegal by the gubberment's own statement. Just don't put a Fed logo on it and don't claim you have the jab and it's good.

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

The "illegal" part is putting federal logo on the "counterfeit" card.

re: "Additionally, the unauthorized use of an official government agency's seal (such as HHS or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)) is a crime, and may be punishable under Title 18 United States Code, Section 1017, and other applicable laws."

https://www.ic3.gov/Media/Y2021/PSA210330

4
PepeFarmsRemembers 4 points ago +4 / -0

FFS the latest comment on Zero Hedge... "Kyle has a strong case. But his mistake was that he was there at the wrong place with a rifle, running into chaos without backup. That is his mistake."

The police forced Kyle to go that direction. He was rendering first aid to a protester and the cops moved up their line. They would not let Kyle rejoin his group or move away from the protesters, they forced him to go towards the mob. Kyle did not make a mistake, he was fucked by the cops whose job he was doing.

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't matter OP. The jabs are still in trials and the manufactures deliver different dosage, ingredients and adjuvants in different lots. Unless you know the lot number of the person you are asking (and the lot number you will be given) you are likely not receiving the same jab.

It could be 100x the dosage, it could be a completely different product, or it could have aluminum instead of Cytosine phosphoguanine ( or any combination of the 5 typical adjuvants, or even a new experimental adjuvant).

2
PepeFarmsRemembers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also the dosages and ingredients are not uniform. This being a trial for all the jabs they deliver different dosages and change/add adjuvants in different lots.

Anecdotal side effect reports are useless without knowing it is the same lot. Since the ingredients are secret that is the only way you can presume side effects may be similar.

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's an anti-McAuliffe sign made by an individual. It's not a campaign or PAC sign because it is missing the required "This sign paid for by..." disclaimer you can see on the democrat's sign in the background (the mice type at the bottom).

As such it's brilliant!

1
PepeFarmsRemembers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just reading Pfizer's own 6 month study should be enough for anybody.

From the study:

  • The 90+% effective number is relative effectiveness. In absolute terms it was only a 4% difference in who tested positive: 96% of placebo never tested postive vs 99.6% of jabbed. (During the study Positive COVID cases were: jab – 81 of 21,642 = .37% -vs- no-jab – 873 of 21,689 = 4.02%)
  • More of the jabbed died (18) than the unjabbed (16) and the jabbed deaths were strange sepsis or heart conditions vs the "normal" deaths of the placebo group
  • 30% of the jabbed had adverse reactions to the jab vs 14% of the placebo group. Of note is they do not use saline or some other non reactive agent as placebo, they use some other vaccine that is "safe".
  • There is no safety data longer than 6 months.

So by their own vaunted study:

You are 4% less likely to get the commie coof if you take the experimental vaccine not 90 something %. It’s the same old relative versus absolute difference sham; The relative difference is 90% but IRL it’s <1 out of 100 versus 4 out of 100 of even testing positive for the Commie Coof, a condition that is usually "asymptomatic" with much less than 1 in 100 chance of being hospitalized, and if you are hospitalized with severe symptoms much less than 1 in a 100 chance of dying.

To put it in perspective, the US 2018 death statistics showed a lifetime chance of 1 in 71 for dying of drug poisoning, 1 in 67 for regular poisoning, 1 in 98 for opioids. Heart disease, cancer, accident deaths, stroke, Alzheimer’s, and Diabetes far outnumber PIC (Pneumonia / Influenza / COVID) deaths, with heart disease and cancer at 10 times the rate of PIC.

view more: Next ›