to reject your NPC talking points
You can't actually refute my points so now I'm an NPC?
you just need to look at countries populated by black people. Widely different history, culture, natural resources, etc.
I did.
How can you reasonably come to the conclusion that its genetic when direct descendants from Nigeria living in the US have a very poor track record, but modern immigrants from Nigeria have very good work ethic and are usually very successful?
The division is clearly not genetic.
But somehow Haiti is a shithole, and so is Zimbabwe and Somalia and Liberia.
And Iceland and the Czech Republic and Lithuania and Portugal are beautiful peaceful and wealthy countries....mmmm I wonder if there's any kind of pattern....
There is a very well known pattern, but its not genetic its geographic.
Perhaps you should read the book "Guns, Germs, and Steel".
It goes into great detail about the enviornmental, economic, and social factors that caused europe to succeed first and dominate the world during the era of colonial expansion.
Not the least of which, was access to domesticatable animals and plants.
To attempt to reduce this to "black people are inferior" is blatant racism, no better than those anti-white NPCs you claim to reject.
The culture is heavily influenced by your genetics.
No. This is not supported by existing science.
Culture correlates with Genetics due to geographical limitations, but genetics are not a strong predictor of culture.
If a population has a very low IQ
The way averages work, even if a population has a very low average IQ there are still going to be very smart individuals. This is why we see most primitive cultures develop "wisemen" like shamans or medicine men or priests.
Moreover, science has identified allels that influence behavior such as violent behavior or poor impulse control. And guess what? They vary a lot across races
So do a lot of alleles. But the variation across races is dwarfed by the variation within races. There is no meaningful correlation in the way you suggest. The ideas you are espousing here are largely debunked "race realist" ideas.
Race is a very reliable predictor of, not individuals, but of how a country or community will perform.
No its not. Culture is, there may be some correlations between culture and genetics, but none that allow you to make the claims you are making.
Otherwise how do 1st generation Nigerian Immigrants perform better than 5th Generation Nigerian Americans?
This is actually a re-articulation of "Lewontin's fallacy".
Which is only a fallacy by some people's interpretation.
Notably the research bears out this "fallacy" quite extensively
Multiple studies have confirmed that the variation across populations exceeds the variation across races quite drastically.
The classic categories of race are notably "exceptions" to this rule only in that typically phenotypically similar individuals share common cultural and geographic backgrounds.
Such assumptions do not hold for pit bulls, nor do they make genetics of race a meaningful predictor. Correlation is not causation.
We can assume that as the distribution of rescue dog breeds is somewhat uniform.
This is another assumption that doesn't hold.
The distribution of dog breeds is not uniform, especially when we limit our criteria to rescues which is an odd choice seeing as purebred dogs exist.
The vast majority of rescues are going to be mutts of ambiguous genetic background.
Even amongst white Pitbull owners of similar education and economic levels, Pitbulls have a higher attack rate than other breeds owned by the same group.
And this rules out "owner treatment because of preconceptions about the breed" or "reporting bias because of preconceptions about the breed" how exactly?
it includes personality, temperament, intelligence, etc
Except these things vary less across races than they do within races.
Race is not a reliable predictor of these things.
"having its basis in one's genes" isn't sufficient to prove you can make the predictions you are making based only on genetics.
The difference in the random attack rate is the quantitative proof.
You must be pretty bad at removing confounding factors if you think the attack rate can jump past culture and education and go straight to genetics.
If we accept that animal abuse is randomly distributed, the differences in attack rate must be due to genetics.
Why would we accept that animal abuse is randomly distributed? There is not a constant rate of animal abuse across even different cultures of the same race.
More so, how can you reasonably rule out "Bad Reputation" as a factor in how pitbulls are treated?
because the economic factors should all apply equally to whites
What?
Where did you get this crazy idea?
Do you think John Smith living in rural alabama in a trailer park has the same economic factors as Hilary Clinton?
But why are the factors that you listed occurring differently among races?
It's mostly cultural as the other poster explicitly mentioned.
genetic variance inside races is larger than genetic variance across races, so race isn't a reliable predictor of anything except skin color.
So you've provided a pretty strong proof of "instincts exist" but nothing to support the idea that "pitbulls inherently have more violent instincts than other bred dogs"
It gets even worse.
Teacher's Unions are overwhelmingly of one political leaning and are incredibly powerful.
You may not have noticed, depending on when you were in school, but in the past ~20 years teachers work harder when a democrat is in office.
During bush the BOE handed out half days and days off like they were candy. During Obama? almost no half days at all.
I've listened to teachers admitting this is intentional to cause education stats to look worse under republican presidents.
These fucks care more about making a president look bad than doing their job and they have for over two decades.
Ho ho, Hey Hey, You do no work you get no pay.
And now you discover the value of a deterrent.
Sure Cuba or Iran could launch an unprovoked attack on the US electrical grid, but what do you think the US military would do to them in return?
Lower indicated receiving IIRC
I think its mostly a 2 tiered system, and its not like anyone is gonna be enforcing it with a ruler
It was also to indicate which role the participant was interested in, depending on the height of the pants.
The phrase "blood is thicker than water" originally meant "blood (shed in battle) is thicker than water (of the womb)"
Implying that the bonds of camraderie formed through fighting for the same thing are stronger than familial ties.
In case you haven't got a serious answer yet, it keeps pieces from breaking off and floating to the surface as the body decays and fish eat it.
If you just give someone concrete shoes they can break off at the ankle or knee and float ashore.
More than one murder has been solved because the perp forgot this step
minor niggle,
you want "Cites" rather than "Sites"
The former indicates a reference to a work or body of knowledge, the latter indicates a collection of locations.
Yeah TBH if you are seeing ads in this day and age its your own fault.
gotta get the money from somewhere when the viewers don't care anymore.
The only way you can be pro BLM but anti ALM is if you somehow believe All Lives Matter is a negation of Black Lives Matter.
All Lives Matter can only be a Negation of Black Lives Matter if BLM means "only Black Lives Matter"
You really don't understand that you are doing exactly the same thing as the anti-white folks do you.
Its embarrassing how proud you are of your ignorance.
Let it sink in bro. EVERY SINGLE COUNTRY!
You understand this is factually wrong?
Like, I don't understand how you could even come to that conclusion without starting at a desired outcome and working from there.
Thats all just a coincidence and hard work.
Yes. How many cultures have existed as long as judaism?
How many of those cultures feature fiscal responsibility and personal responsibility as core tenets?
And here's the real kicker.
Why are there so many poor ass jews if they run the world?
Platforms shadowban, including reddit. As a tool, it's allowed without being a publisher.
Not if its performed along political lines.
Which as you noted, is exactly what he lied about.
but he had to claim that they don't have political bias to keep 230.
Yes, claiming something because you "have to" rather than because its the truth while under oath is called "perjury"
So believing that individuals who have cultures that promote successful behavior can rise meritocratically is "zionsim"?
I could give shit about Israel and Jewish nationalism.
However, it should be noted that East Asians have a higher IQ on average than Jews, and a culturally stronger work ethic. Yet, in media, finance, and government, Asians don't hold a candle to Jews, when it comes to influence.
Perhaps that has something to do with the systemic discrimination against asians in US education.
I wouldn't go so far as to call it a conspiracy, but I can't think of anything other than mass nepotism
Then I would say you have a limited imagination.
What you can think of doesn't limit what can happen.
It's exactly the same thing as Bernie Sanders no longer complaining about millionaires after becoming one.
The "evil" is always those who are more successful and aren't sharing.
Not really.
Races aren't monolithic.
It's unsurprising that a culture that respects values that lead to success has successful individuals more prevalently than cultures that dont.
Says the person appealing to the idea that all black countries are shitholes because of genetics.
"much lower" being about an 8% difference max, when individual intelligence within a population can vary by as much as 30%.
Its not a meaningful predictor.
So you are just rejecting reality as anti-white propaganda?
That's downright insane.
Do you even understand the relationship between domestication and the rise of civilization?
I bet you can't even see the absolute irony of accusing me of appealing to anecdotes and knowing nothing about history while appealing to anecdotes and disregarding historical realities .