Jews. Who runs Jews? Satan.
Imagine sending you kid to an academic institution. If you have a dual-income family where the wife isn't staying home to home-school your child and you're on this website, you should leave this website, make a reddit account and practice being a good communist because you've just handed your children over to the State to be indoctrinated and you line will be cut off.
The problem is that the elites on either side think they will be the rulers of this new world order. They don't care about everyone else. Anyone looking to politics for solutions is a moron.
Does Ukraine have a military to enforce their laws? If they don't use their military to enforce their laws then their law is meaningless.
Illegal immigration works when countries build walls and deport the illegals because they have the force to enforce said laws. You are correct that when you open the borders and treat illegal immigrants better than citizens that the "legal" distinction becomes pointless.
Laws are only meaningful when they are enforced, otherwise, they are meaningless. I could make up a law today that says anyone who disagrees with me is a faggot. Now you're a faggot and it's by law. If you try to say you aren't a faggot you're saying something illegal. It's 100% irrelevant.
I get that you like Ukraine and I love Ukraine as well. Trust me. Russia is better for Ukraine than the west 1000x over. The west destroys countries and makes them hallow shells to be used as nothing more than resource extraction colonies. The west destroys unity, destroys traditions, destroys cultures and completely effects societies with their leftist poison that destroys families and keeps people spiritually frustrated and ensures their only purpose in life is to enhance the power and wealth of the western elites.
Russia is corrupt and not nearly as wealthy but it has spirit, unity, tradition and culture that it protects. Ukraine will never be able to combat the west on its own because it is wholly unprepared for it. Every other country in Europe has fallen to western influence or is close to. Russia would be good for Ukraine over the long-term.
It might actually end peacefully if we don't do anything. The left will take over. America will change its values to some equity BS. The white race and western civilization will dwindle into nothingness. An underclass of low IQ non-whites who simply work to enhance the power/wealth of the elite take over. Most humans are now indentured servants living only to work for the elite kind of like old feudalism. No violence ever needs to occur. This could go on for thousands of years before there's ever a change.
It's good to question vaccines. They are not as harmless as they lead you to believe. The names of the ingredients of what's in them though is not really the best argument against vaccines.
illegally annexed.... hahahahahhahahaha. There's an oxy-moron if I ever heard one. Did they annex it successfully? Then it was legal.
I mean, I warned everyone either you go all the way or not at all because they're going to pick you off one-by-one. I remember even saying, Jan 6th is either a full blown revolution or don't show up. It's terrible what's going on but there's nothing that can be done about it short of full blown revolution.
You get what you deserve.
That's what's nationalists do; they fight for their country because they are nationalistic. They care about their own country's sovereignty. They are NATIONalists. The nation they fight for is Ukraine.
Just because they are right-wing fighting right-wing doesn't mean Russia is the bad guy or tell us anything about leftists. When the monarch of France was fighting the monarch of English you had Fair-Right Nationalists fighting Far-Right Nationalists.
Here's the quick summary.
Ukraine has a large group of people who are loyal to the EU and the west. These people have a chance of taking over the country and subverting Ukraine into becoming a leftist hellhole like everywhere else the west touches. If Russia is repelled, there is a high chance Ukraine succumbs to leftism. I don't care how based and strong the far-right nationalists in Ukraine think they are, unless they're killing their own leftists in Kiyv (they aren't), then they will fall in time without Russian help.
Russia has proven to be the only country in Europe that can stand up to the west. Either Ukraine is in the west's sphere or influence or Russia's. There is no in-between.
Invading is always just and right if the invaders win. That's how it works. What matters is what is in our interests. Ukraine falling to western degradation is not good for us. Russia should take over Ukraine and block Ukraine from western decadence.
Regarding your first part: I hate to be a neo-Nazi but the left makes more sense if you think of them like Jews who do everything they can purposely to attack white men because they're mad at white men. Might not be true but everyone makes a lot more sense. Why does the left "get it" for Muslims and not "white men"? Well, what if the goal was always to destroy white men not be morally equal between all groups? The tolerance of Muslims by the left was again simply a means to weaken white men.
Over the years I pretty much have become a neo-Nazi myself though I don't both with the brand because the Nazis lost and Hitler make mistakes. A lot of what they were fighting for sounds great: white nationalist country, a country that works for its people instead of the people in other countries, strong moral system that promotes traditional gender roles and nuclear families, a sense of unity and purpose. What is there not to like? The socialism part can easily be replaced by National Capitalism instead. Even the authoritarian angle isn't really a big deal. When I can't call someone a faggot because it's a hate crime then which country is truly the authoritarian State? At least Hitler's idea of authority was to benefit the people where as nothing in today's society seems to benefit us.
My parents both think I'm some radicalized white supremacist. I always ask them one thing. If you think my ideas, values and beliefs are wrong then offer me an alternative that actually works for me. The left's value-system has no tangible benefit to me so why would I ever accept it?
Imagine having a Jewish parent and then becoming a neo-Nazi. I mean, that should be a huge wake up call that maybe your parenting is the problem...
In my reading this summer on the roots of totalitarianism, the most basic thing that comes through is that radicalism of this sort appeals most of all to people who feel small and alone. Woke ideology, as manifested in institutions like Sam’s school (as you can read in the story) holds that males are in the wrong, and that women are in the right. That victims must always be believed — and “victims” includes members of certified victim classes. The woke bureaucracy at that school steamrollered this kid. And there was the alt-right, online, prepared to give him recognition and validation, and to provide malicious theories for why he had been treated so badly.
You don't say, an ideology that oppresses and vilifies men leads men to seek out an ideology that welcomes men? Next up in my way too long analysis of stuff: water is wet.
Western society worked when it was inclusive and merit based but the second people realized they could subvert the meritocracy by playing the victim and vilifying the people who were superior to them, western society was destined for failure.
The reality is that school isn't really needed. Most people who go to school waste their time and money. We need to move on as a society away from the school mould.
I figured it out at ~30yo, which to be fair, is about when you should expect men to figure it out but it was too late 2 years ago to live the life and not just talk it. The structure of society was already changes such that it is almost impossible to come back from. The real culprits if you want to lay blame are the baby boomers who whored out their children in order to live a comfy life and who were entirely and still are almost wholly blind to the destruction they caused.
Is letter everyone vote a good thing? Is letting unchecked immigration a good thing? Is letting freedom of religion a good thing? The way in which SCOTUS has interpreted parts to push equality as led to many issues. Forced integration for example should not be constitutional. The civil rights act should not be constitutional. Are all the amendments actually good, like the income tax or women's suffrage etc...
There's issues with the constitution.
Right, people are being taught what to think not how to think. This is being done on purpose. The people in control of these institutions don't want free thinkers, they want obedience to an ideology.
The reason these academic types can't figure things out is often because they're in way over their heads with the propaganda. Imagine you have some Lego and Duplo sitting around. You could easily see the Lego and Duplo then make an assessment regarding which you think is better. Academics basically are handed Duplo then have entire fortresses built up using Duplo. They can no longer see the Lego. When someone asks which is better, Duplo or Lego, they answer Duplo because it's all they know. When you try to present them with Lego, they ignore it because it's outside of what they can see. Academia often builds peoples minds up with garbage and obfuscates the truth.
Abolish all income taxes and offset the lower tax revenues with increased tariffs in order to encourage more domestic production.
Just an area to organize all thoughts would be good.
Also, women is one of the easier ways to redpill men and ultimately, you'll need lots of single men willing to throw their life away if you want to finish the part about how to get your own society.
All wars are fought over resources and women is a resource to men to be fought over. You won't truly get the support you need for a new society until there's enough single men and/or families without food/shelter.
I don't think you should focus on trying to "frame things" in an easier to swallow pill. I think you're best approach is to be 100% brutally honest with the full truth. When you speak the truth, entirely unencumbered by cultural lies and propaganda, it resonates with people as if you're speaking to their very soul and they know it. When you try to be sneaky in presentation to "trick" people with "easier to swallow pills", you're just playing the same game as the deceivers and people dismiss it still all the same.
The way to wake people up is not through words. That is rarely how anyone wakes up. People wake up through feeling and it's often major life moments. Divorces, loss of jobs, not getting promotions, losing entire savings, etc... Then when these people are looking for answers, you present them the full truth. This is why revolutions and the like tend to happen around times of economic/social upheaval because there's more key moments where people begin to look for the truth and break out of the lies of the culture they'd been fed.
Perhaps at least having a full truth foundation to pull from allows for easier to create memes for converting as you'd say. A Bible so to speak of fundamental values and their you can quote certain parts of it to entice people to seek the full truth.
If a woman disrespects a man, she should get hit. By restricting and removing this mechanism of control in society, we've oppressed an advantage men have over women and thus suppressed the natural order. This has led to unhappy men and out of control women with poor outcomes for both sexes. From time-to-time a woman should get hit in order to curb her behavior and assert the truth of who is truly in charge. Women act like they are equal in a society where laws are all enforced by other men. This behavior of women is unbecoming and leads to a poor outcome.
Hitting women who don't deserve it is a problem but hitting women who deserve it is fine. Also, a wife has a duty to her husband which includes sex and if she isn't working toward her duty, she should be punished. Physical punishment is a viable method to discipline others.
The "problems" of the patriarchy were only problems that feminists made up to subvert the patriarchy. They were much less problematic than people realize because we've all been fed lies and propaganda. Most of the women truly did deserve it and needed to be put in their place.
I agree with having a page dedicated strictly to how we should run a society if we were in charge so to speak. We are extremely divided on this.
For example, I have 0 care for an egalitarian society. I want a patriarchy where a woman's role is at home raising kids not in politics or the workplace and I won't budge on this because I know anything short of this simply leads to where we are now. Whereas I know a lot of people on here fully embrace equality. These are discussions we should be having though because I am firmly of the belief that equality always leads to leftism. Even if you recreate a new society that has X values, so long as it's one based on equality between men and women you will get what we have today in time, every single time. You're at best simply dialing back the clock to the 1990s and then you'll end up in 2020 in another 30 years anyway. The only way to stop leftism is to accept traditional gender roles and enforce those roles so that the roots of equality can never take hold and therefore leftism can never grow. Universal suffrage must be abolished and this is one of the most important things.
Then we have a whole discussion on race neutrality we need to have. Leftists used race neutrality to blind conservatives to the truth so the left could subvert western countries. If you embrace race neutrality, you lose, every single time.
It would also be nice to discuss how to get to our own society too. Unless we completely take control of mainstream media and nationalize our production/banking, we're just playing a game within their system that is designed to never ever allow us to win.
One step further. Drop all welfare programs.
Correct, there's nothing illegal about raping kids unless someone declares it illegal and then enforces it.
Immoral might be a better word than illegal because you can make a moral argument about things without necessarily having a legal backing.
What issues does Putin stand in the way on? I agree that there aren't any better leaders. That's always how it goes though. No leader is perfect. At least Putin generally as a whole has the right idea.
In this discussion, it's Ukraine that worries me. I worry if Ukraine successfully appeals to the west for aid in maintaining its sovereignty against Russia, it will be a deal with the devil and Ukraine will be culturally dominated by the west. Western cultural domination is infinitely worse than losing sovereignty to Russia, in my opinion.