1
PeytonManThing 1 point ago +1 / -0

She’s 28. Children are a lot of responsibility. Part of it is economic, but we could afford children. But she’s never wanted children. Children annoy her and gross her out. Even if I made $100,000 a year and she could be a stay at home mom, she wouldn’t want them. My sister (31 years old) uses economics to rationalize not having children, but really her husband just doesn’t want them. They do have money problems, but it’s not because they don’t earn enough. They make about $75,000 a year together, and that’s living in South Carolina, where that goes a long way.

1
PeytonManThing 1 point ago +1 / -0

What some places do is provide daycare. But then those daycares get used by the government to indoctrinate children. We also have cultural problems. We live in a morality system where whenever one person wants to do something and the other doesn’t, the person who wants to do a thing is expected to just give up, and the person who wants to do nothing is expected to get what they want. In this context, that means in a married couple, if one spouse wants kids, and the other doesn’t, no children are had. That’s probably the case in 99 out of 100 cases. I have an uncle who didn’t have children because his wife decided she didn’t want them. My sister isn’t having kids because her husband doesn’t want them. And my wife and I aren’t having kids because my wife doesn’t want them. In this world, and with so many people simply not wanting the responsibility of children (affordability in reality isn’t the issue, these are all middle class families), it’s really easy to have the population plummet. The point is we need a culture change.

1
PeytonManThing 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s a bridge too far. Yes the left is extremely racist against White people. And yes the left wants to reduce the world population because of Muh Climate Change. But I don’t think they’re worried about setting up an elite class generations from now exploiting a second class.

3
PeytonManThing 3 points ago +4 / -1

The problem is those family policies will all go to poor black families. Which is probably why they don’t exist here.

5
PeytonManThing 5 points ago +6 / -1

I think Elon Musk is trying to escape it on Mars

1
PeytonManThing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seeing so much change happen, not because it’s needed, or based on facts, but because people have been misinformed and are irrationally angry, is really disconcerting. And it makes me wonder how much societal changes has occurred in the past that we take for granted but was based on bullshit and has made us worse off. I mean, there’s obvious stuff like radical feminism. But there’s probably a lot more.

5
PeytonManThing 5 points ago +5 / -0

We live in a clown world, where a man can attack the police, and the outrage is that the police defended themselves. But only if the attacker is black and the cop is white.

1
PeytonManThing 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, if they’re in relationship with someone of the same sex, or even in a gay marriage, it’d be pretty good witness testimony.

4
PeytonManThing 4 points ago +5 / -1

I suppose only the officer knows how much pressure he was using, but why’d he keep his knee on the man’s neck after he lost consciousness?

1
PeytonManThing 1 point ago +2 / -1

Haiti is the shittiest hole of a country, and that’s a fact.

9
PeytonManThing 9 points ago +9 / -0

I mean Joy Reid is right. It is very sad that black men insist on turning a DUI into a shootout with the police. Black men, get your fucking shit together.

2
PeytonManThing 2 points ago +2 / -0

My wedding anniversary is Donald Trump’s birthday

2
PeytonManThing 2 points ago +3 / -1

This has to be faked. There was another very similar (also probably fake) conversation posted here not long ago.

15
PeytonManThing 15 points ago +15 / -0

If he was a registered republican, you would’ve heard about it

2
PeytonManThing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any Klobuchar personally dropped his charges???

2
PeytonManThing 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem was that the cop who was shouting and the cop who shot were actually two different cops, IIRC. The cop who was shouting and caused the situation to get so bad is the one who should’ve been prosecuted. But the cop who shot Daniel was the one put on trial. The one who shot should’ve faced jail time too, but I think his actions were less egregious, because he didn’t create that overly tense situation. Daniel obviously isn’t going for a gun. And even if he was, you could wait until you actually saw the gun before you shoot you fucking punk. You’ve got a rifle trained on him, you can kill him in a tenth of a second.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›