53
PhilosoGuido 53 points ago +53 / -0

Hunter Biden balls deep in an underage hooker while smoking a 5 gram rock of crack rn.

4
PhilosoGuido 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are criminal courts and civil courts. In order for a criminal act to be prosecuted, there has to be a prosecutor who is willing to bring the case. Most of these Democrat criminal operatives commit their crimes in jurisdictions where they know the prosecutors are fellow corrupt loyal leftists who will never charge them.

2
PhilosoGuido 2 points ago +2 / -0

China takes over the world and enslaves the rest of the world's population.

12
PhilosoGuido 12 points ago +13 / -1

They aren't dumb. They are actively trying to eradicate free thinkers and patriots from their ranks, just like the cucked military. They want compliant, yes men who will not question the agenda no matter how stupid or evil.

18
PhilosoGuido 18 points ago +19 / -1

As pathetic as they are, the Republican Party is more effective and based than they ever have been thanks to Trump and America First candidates. We need to continue the purge of RINO scam and completely take over the party from the grassroots. Frankly it's our fault it even got this bad in the first place. Too many patriots have been content to do nothing but vote on election day and bitch and moan but never get involved in party inner-workings. Precinct Strategy is the most promising solution to take this party over.

2
PhilosoGuido 2 points ago +2 / -0

First act of business for the new Congress: elect Trump as Speaker of the House.

Second: defund the DOJ until Garland, Wray, and everyone involved in this raid are fired.

4
PhilosoGuido 4 points ago +4 / -0

They will never get enough Democrats to remove him from office. When the GOP takes over they need to stonewall all spending bills that fund the DOJ until he resigns or is fired by Xiden.

28
PhilosoGuido 28 points ago +28 / -0

Except none has ever been chopped off. They just keep creating more anyway.

14
PhilosoGuido 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is a classic scam of the left. It's called "forum shopping." Filing in the right place and time to get the corrupt partisan judge they want to rule their way.

7
PhilosoGuido 7 points ago +7 / -0

She was his kids' babysitter.

3
PhilosoGuido 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, that's much more convincing than a picture. A single snapshot doesn't prove anything but she has a long history of deceit and backstabbing like this that proves much more.

7
PhilosoGuido 7 points ago +7 / -0

IRS builds a database of conservatives based on political donations, social media posts, etc. Then this is used to cross reference which returns magically get flagged for audits.

3
PhilosoGuido 3 points ago +6 / -3

I did Nazi that coming

1
PhilosoGuido 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can perform an experiment that demonstrates that this is possible (a single light source refracting to generate nonlinear shadows on a flat surface) very cheaply and easily on the ground, but obviously we would need access to the sky to determine whether or not this is happening.

Ok so you admit that you have no evidence and that your explanation is pure conjecture.

As for your gravity denial, I don't have time to explain the physics to someone with zero baseline and who rejects clear evidence and substitutes fantasies (with zero evidence). Seriously go take an intro physics course at your local college. They start you from nothing and build up from there. I can't even engage in a discussion because your just spouting pseudoscientific gibberish and making patently false statements. You don't have the prerequisite knowledge to have the discussion you think you want to have. Go learn the basics and come back when you can at least frame your points properly.

1
PhilosoGuido 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's refraction. Remember, the sticks-and-shadows experiment relies entirely on parallel rays hitting the Earth's surface...

Yeah this is not evidence whatsoever. This is conjecture (like everything else you post). You haven't proven that it is happening only concocted a hypothetical explanation for how it MIGHT possibly be happening. See in real science you then have to go into a lab and demonstrate experimentally that your hypothesis is actually happening.

Gravity has never been proven.

Go jump off a cliff then. Let me know how that works out for you. 😆 I knew this was the next absurdity. Gravity denial. You're not stupid enough to believe this but EXTREMELY ignorant. Go to your community college and just audit for free a physics course. Of course gravity has been proven a thousand different ways. A pilot colleague of mine worked flying highly sensitive gravity measuring equipment for the military to map the small changes in gravity because they use that data in undersea surveillance equipment.

We're both engaging for the same reason. I'm wondering how capable minds will accept such an insane, flimsy premise through brute-force indoctrination. I mean you talk about layer-upon-layer of deception, where do you think all of this math comes from in your model !?! Hint - it doesn't come from experiments.

I believe in a spherical earth because I've flown around the entire planet. I use great circle routing every day in my job. I see how the coriolis effect causes the prevailing winds. I take off with the sun completely set and watch as it completely reemerges from behind the horizon as I climb. I have a close friend who flys the U-2 over 70,000 ft and has seen the earth's curvature personally. I have astronaut colleagues in the company I work at. You on the other hand create baseless fantasy on top of baseless fantasy to explain away the simple.

1
PhilosoGuido 1 point ago +1 / -0

This describes the entirety of the heliocentric model!

Are you serious? Have you ever looked at the math to describe the motion of the planets in a geocentric model. It's ghastly. It takes pages. Then look at the math for the heliocentric model and the equations are simple and work perfectly. Of course you give no proof of your "atmosphere lensing" just make baseless counter-accusations. Is your argument really just "I know you are but what am I?"

Ignore every experiment that disagree with the model.

The reason the heliocentric, spherical globe model is universally accepted is because all the data, experiments, and math confirm it.

I answered the question about sticks and shadows, you said it was entirely impossible - it isn't.

No, you really didn't. You added another layer of fantasy to your last fantasy but again provided no evidence to substantiate that. So now you have a fantasy of flat earth, supported by the fantasy of close small sun (with no evidence), supported by the fantasy of atmospheric lens effect (also with no evidence). It's like a child who makes up a lie and then has to make up ever more absurd lies to explain the holes in the last lie.

Now it's your turn to explain how high pressure exists next to low pressure without a barrier.

I'd rather not getting sidetracked into some discussion of the nonexistence of gravity. (Another rabbithole) Let's just stick with what's on our plate.

Now, for me, my interest in this is understanding the psychology of conspiracy theorists. So I'll indulge this discussion if you will answer some questions. What do you get out of believing this? Why would you choose to believe something that requires layer upon layer of elaborate fantasy all without evidence to explain away the simple explanation.

1
PhilosoGuido 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no evidence that the atmosphere is acting as a concave lens (but you guys never posit evidence other than it is necessary or it debunks your predetermined conclusions). Nevertheless, hypothetically if this were happening, you said the atmosphere makes the moon look bigger. A concave lens needed to bend the rays to give the non linear sequence of shadows observed would make things look smaller, not bigger.

Before I get into your atmosphere tangent, answer my question, why do aircraft fly Great Circle routes to conserve fuel. If the earth were flat they would be flying much longer routes wasting millions of dollars in fuel. But a curved route is the shortest distance on a spherical globe.

view more: Next ›