2
PikachuJohnson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Retards liberals gonna retard liberal.

6
PikachuJohnson 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just write down how the guy who invented all this "gEnDeR iS a sOcIaL cOnStRuCt" bullshit, John Money, was a pedophile who conducted his research on two young twin boys by forcing them to have sex with each other, and that both of them committed suicide from the psychological trauma endured during his experiments. Then write that if you believe that gender is a social construct and gender identity, you are a pedophile.

Isn't that how liberal logic works?

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is so true. I haven't done this, nor would I (and you probably don't know what the Hell I'm talking about lol), but I could post on the r/Stellaris subreddit how I conquered the entire galaxy, including Fallen Empires, in less than 100 years--before the midgame even starts (which is completely true). However, I'd be leaving out important details, like that I played on the easiest difficulty and heavily used console commands (cheats) and cheat mods.

I technically wouldn't be lying to sound much cooler, but I wouldn't be telling the truth either.

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or 12 taxidermied cats he uses as dildos.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. My rules for voting:

  1. Proof of citizenship.

  2. Photographic ID.

  3. Only in-person voting on the day of the election.

  4. Only paper ballots.

  5. Strict chain-of-custody. If chain of custody is broken, all ballots in question shall be invalid.

  6. Every ballot must be counted separately by two teams each consisting of a registered member of both parties who have long-term partisan voting record for the party to which they belong, of which both people must agree on how each vote is counted, and observed by another team of like composition, who must rectify any discrepancies between the final tallies, if any occur, and all three teams must sign an oath under penalty of perjury and imprisonment that certifies that the ballots are authentic and have been counted correctly.

  7. Security cameras at all polling stations, covering every inch of anywhere ballots are manufactured, stored, transported in/to, and counted, monitored by two teams of two people with the same qualifications as above, with a team of like composition, with each team accountable to the other.

  8. If any evidence of fraud is presented, an automatic recount shall begin involving all ballots originating at the precinct or election in question, and shall follow the same processes followed above.

My idea is that if you have two highly partisan people on opposite sides counting the votes and making sure the count is secure and accurate, neither one will allow the other to commit, allow, or ignore fraud. And second team is to ensure a corrupt deal or other foul play doesn't occur. I know that voter fraud is a uniquely left-wing problem and conservatives don't do it, but all laws must be applied equally, and I want all cheating to the prevented, even if it benefits us.

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. In the 2020 "election" there were supposedly 159 million votes cast. The problem with that is, there are only 133 million registered voters. Which means nationwide turnout was 120%. It's so obvious, even a retard liberal can see it!

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't matter. Considering that, nationwide, conservatives outnumber liberals at least two-to-one, with all things being equal, if conservatives have 55% turnout, an moderates split fifty-fifty or better in our favor, we win, even if there's 100% liberal turnout.

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. There's no way to have such a massive campaign of voter fraud with only four years to prepare. It's been around for decades. The only reasons why Trump actually won in 2016 were:

  1. They half-assed the fraud because they thought Trump had no chance, and

  2. It was a 40+-state landslide, sans fraud

2
PikachuJohnson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. I'm convinced that, if it weren't for massive voter fraud, every election would be a 400+ electoral vote landslide for Republicans like in '80, '84, and '88, and Republicans would have a supermajority in both Houses almost every Congress.

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. This is why they should either use the splitline districting method (a method that uses an algorithm to make equally-populated districts while maintaining the smallest possible perimeter-to-area ratio for each district to prevent gerrymandering) or make all Congressional seats at-large districts (which would mean that every person would vote for every member of their state's House delegation, which would also prevent gerrymandering but be an absolute nightmare for voters in massive states like California or Texas, who would have to vote for 53 and 36 Representatives, respectively).

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. And we must fight that war before it's too late. Otherwise there will be nothing we can do.

8
PikachuJohnson 8 points ago +8 / -0

Personally I liked the orange. Makes him unique. Looks better with it, too. But that's just my two cents. I also loved the looks on libtards' faces when I told them, "He can't be a white supremacist because he's not white, he's orange!"

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you mean... faggots?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›