This is my letter to our area electric co-op.
To whom it may concern,
Is it true that the Department of Energy is going to require ERCOT to inflate the price per mWh during the rolling blackouts?
If the average price is $27.12 p/mWh (on my statement it says $0.02712 per kWh) but ERCOT inflates to $1,500 per mWh (during an emergency no less!) that will put unbearable strain on our already struggling economy.
In Texas, I read that 4.5 million homes were affected. At the increased rate, that would mean, for an average of 885 kWh per home, ERCOT would have a net revenue of 5.85 TRILLION dollars! Who is getting this money? What gives them the right to extort us this way? What can we do to prevent this?
From my research (people who are experts support this) nuclear energy is proven to be more efficient, has fewer emissions and is more reliable. As your company is based on providing energy, this is an ideal option for all concerned.
I have been a [my local electric company] customer for 20 years. You guys have done a great job. What can I do to support your autonomy?
Sincerely,
I was really hoping that all the election fraud would be brought out because the house managers were baiting them to do so and it seemed the entire basis for their argument could have been deconstructed with evidence we know they have. What I didn’t realize was maybe the reason they didn’t want to investigate the electoral college votes was because if the presidential election was proven to be corrupt...what about their own elections from the same dominion machines?
If the defense had used that today, not only would it have presented the opportunity for the HM to find a loophole (chain of custody, official audit, etc.) and if they had, the election fraud would have been neutralized in public opinion. But also, the whole purpose of the defense was to prove to the senators that it was unconstitutional. Do you think the senators would have voted not to impeach based on a corrupt election that could also implicate themselves?
I’m holding the wine!
Edit: I just had a thought. What if the entire purpose of the impeachment was to disqualify Trump when he does prove he won the election? They started the process while he was still in office and if the impeachment were to include prohibition from future office...wouldn’t that also nullify the November election? Holy cow, that would be so devious. I know Peloosy didn’t think of that!
I heard Simon Parkes say he had been “researching” (not sure what exactly) which was why he had been selected to participate in ____ (unknown) but has not continued his research and only watch’s BBC and CNN. I’m scratching my head here because once a researcher ALWAYS a researcher and to “only” watch the “other side” is very different than trying to stay up to date on what the other side is saying... Am I the only one with some questions here?
CSET Bureau...what is the scope of it’s jurisdiction and how could this affect social media as well as the e.o. imposing asset forfeiture if found complicit in treason?