3
PineT3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lucifers plan: EVERYBODY wins! EVERYBODY gets immortality and eternal happiness! NOBODY goes to hell! Oh, but give Lucifer all the power first.

Communism: EVERYBODY wins! EVERYBODY gets a house, car, and living wage! NOBODY goes broke! Oh, but give the government all the power first.

Christ's plan: Follow God's plan

God's plan: Everyone gets a CHOICE. If you choose to try, even if you fail from time to time, Christ makes up for the slack. If you choose evil, Christ can't force you to be good. The people who choose good get to share everything God has, the people who choose evil lose everything.

1
PineT3 1 point ago +3 / -2

You'd be surprised how many church members despise Romney. I would not be surprised if he was elected fraudulently.

As for the actual church leadership, they do not endorse candidates on any side. The one exception I can think of is that one time where both candidates wanted to lynch and kill churchmembers, so we voted third party in protest, but that's about it.

1
PineT3 1 point ago +4 / -3

Please read the Articles Of Faith (and preferably the Book Of Mormon) before discussing corruption in the church.

  1. We are warned, repeatedly, of what happens when individuals and leaders in the church become deceived. We are warned, explicitly, that the "very elect" (read: leaders & role models) will be led astray.

  2. We are warned, repeatedly, that no mortal on this earth is to be relied upon, and that ALL revelation needs to be verified directly by ones personal connection to God. "Blind" faith is actively discouraged.

Instead of judging the church based on the people who flagrantly ignore the teachings and warnings in the Book Of Mormon, I would much rather you judge the church based on the people who are making an honest attempt at living the gospel.

3
PineT3 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it were rigged, it would have been more exciting. Instead, the game was won within the first quarter and only got more one sided from there.

Of all the superbowls to skip, you guys didn't miss much.

2
PineT3 2 points ago +2 / -0

I edited my post, thanks. The remaining points should still be valid - that post had a lot of issues.

3
PineT3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any unaffiliated, free speech platform he decides to go to will become an overnight success. He has an army of autists who have what it takes to upload his videos to youtube faster than they can be deleted. He has an army of pedes redpilling the normies in the streets.

Bit Tech has never been weaker. It might not look like it online, because most of the change is in interpersonal interactions and word of mouth. There are few things Bit Tech is better at than inflating it's failing numbers, too.

1
PineT3 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's legitimately difficult to detect sarcasm. The written word simply doesn't have the expression and inflection that voice does.

Browsing while tired doesn't help.

2
PineT3 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fact that the middleman (WS) is running a scam, and their customers are innocent, does not mean that the middleman should be immune to vengeance.

1
PineT3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blocked. Not quite worth deporting, but on the edge. Flashy letters, multiple fonts, multiple font sizes, lots of bold letters... I won't even bother following any more of your links.

If it walks like a scam, talks like a scam, looks like a scam, and sounds too good to be true... it's probably a scam. Or really, really bad advertising. Either way, not worth touching.

1
PineT3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ooor, I just use adblock/dissenter for everything.

No thanks.

I don't trust anything that has ever word from the snake oil salesman bingo card on it. Flashy letters, flashy fonts, nope nope nope.

2
PineT3 2 points ago +2 / -0

How is 6% considered chump change? I'm curious.

7
PineT3 7 points ago +7 / -0

Don't forget nuclear. We already have a tried and true, pollution free alternative. The amount of waste is miniscule, and if you go the route of minireactors, even the worst case "meltdowns" aren't a big deal.

2
PineT3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Poster post history: 3 hours old.

Link: An eyesore advertising a $37 dollar book, using every word on the snake oil salesman bingo card.

Verdict: Sellout.

Question: Who is gullible enough to upvote this? Did they not check the link first?

-1
PineT3 -1 points ago +2 / -3

I'm sure this is a good meme, but it's too obscure to be stickied IMO. Not every sticky is a winner, better luck next time.

1
PineT3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very suspicious. The only reason to divide the community on Patriots.win is if we are compromised, yet he doesn't claim that we're compromised... so why does he want to divide us?

And why does he brag about wanting us protected by a corporation?

1
PineT3 1 point ago +1 / -0

He admits to wanting to put the domain under the "protection" of a corporation. Reread his post.

2
PineT3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Happened to me to... I wonder why I got redirected to the old domain when I signed in to reply to a comment here? Is my account compromised now?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
PineT3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is confusing, as there are multiple AdamCrigler's on youtube.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
PineT3 0 points ago +1 / -1

See my post. There are a lot of logical inconsistencies in that post, I don't think we can trust the old owner. He might not be a bad guy, but he isn't reliable.

My hope was always that the domain and site assets would be put under a corporation

I mean, REALLY??? You were shocked when people ran from your domain?

view more: Next ›