Ah, I also live in a suburban setting, bordering on rural. That is why I found it remarkable. It increased over the past few months. It's gotten to the point where at least one flies by every hour some nights, sometimes more. I don't know what type because I am inside and even if I look out the window it's difficult to find them in the sky (especially at night).
What "vibes" do you mean? He's not trying to be a military strategist, by the way... he's a concerned patriotic lawyer. Anyone who is not preparing for things to get worse needs to wake up. We've had a year of rioting. We are in a constitutional crisis. As for the formatting, maybe he is just trying to reach a broader base and not be arrogant.
Exactly. That's why I am getting really tired of some of the posts/comments popping up in here like "Americans have no one to blame except themselves for what is happening." Like they can fuck right off to Shanghai with that effort to displace blame.
I do not think my fellow Americans are my enemies, especially not the ones that are completely uninformed, the ones that are victims of gas-lighting and mental abuse by the media. They aren't leading the hostile take-over of our institutions. They're victims of it.
Of course, there are degrees to what I said. I think there are people in this country that are being willfully silent on certain issues because it benefits them politically. Like Antifa AKA the interconnected groups that together form a designated terrorist organization, and claim to be anti-fascist.
There are so many different reports/sources going around. I've seen references to Western universities, too.
Has anyone compiled a list of CCP members in the United States? And/or American universities employing CCP party members?
I think there are several reasons. First, he tries to talk to people outside of his base. Can't hold that against him, especially when he was running for re-election. Even now, I think he wants to speak to the entire country. Second, the media would have had a field day calling him an anti-vaxxer. Most people don't believe that vaccines cause autism. But I think the media would characterize him in that camp. That would turn even more people away from him who don't take the time to look things up on their own. Third, even people on the Left and liberals doubt the safety of the vaccine since Trump is "involved" which may aat least open the conversation up.
Look at his comments about the vaccine in a broader context. He has been very ambivalent about the mask bullshit, often making jokes about it. And he tried to get the word out about hydroxychloroquine MONTHS ago.
He has said stuff like a vaccine will be available to every American that wants one. If your local/state government mandates it, you need to resist it at that level. Just like New Yorkers needed to take their death rate up with Gov. Cuomo for sending COVID patients into nursing homes. What would be even worse is if the federal government mandates a vaccine, which he has made it pretty clear his administration would not do.
I can see that now lol. SD is one of the best states in the union. I actually started thinking that since I first visited about a decade ago. This year has confirmed that belief. Gov. Noem has a steel backbone. I am happy for you if you live there.
Jeeze. I know everyone is on edge. But I think it is better to lighten up. Prepare for what's coming instead of getting drawn into conflicts with people that share essentially the same fundamental values.
If you go look at all of Milo's Parler posts today, he seems so fucking black-pilled. Now everyone in this thread is lashing out at him.
Stop acting like a bunch of leftists fighting over pointless differences. You sound like leftists bickering about the difference between "anarcho-communist-Trotskyist" and "tanky-communist-stalinist" or whatever the fuck.
You are right -- states can sue other states. BUT that is not a standing issue. States entered the Federal system with their sovereignty intact. And the judicial authority is limited by state's sovereignty. BUT the Supreme Court has held that federal courts may entertain a suit by one State against another State. South Dakota v. North Carolina, 192 U.S. 286 (1904).
But the Supreme Court did not reject this TX lawsuit on the grounds that TX cannot sue another state.
They denied it for lack of "standing." They said TX has not demonstrated a "judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections."
The brief order did not explain why TX did NOT demonstrate a "judicially cognizable interest." But that requirement usually is not met by a general grievance of all citizens that the Government violated procedures
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OSJDhZvLtak
Is this the one you mean?