1
Pla-ket-ket 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah that was disappointing. I still think we should push for it.

1
Pla-ket-ket 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s possible, but I think it’s more that the current situation has made it easy for them to shrink back into complacency. Fuckers.

1
Pla-ket-ket 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Inauguration hasn’t happened. Allegedly we were close to getting AZ, GA, and PA to flip. Within a few votes. It will help us. If we get the decertification they can never escape that. There is then grounds to go after impeachment and removal. We must not just throw our hands up and let this go. They wouldn’t. We must be relentless.

2
Pla-ket-ket 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never understand this argument. You don’t ask for permission.

We have plenty of laws in place that they just broke. They didn’t follow the law and have yet to be held accountable. May hap that’s what’s coming, but they are currently not paying for their transgressions.

6
Pla-ket-ket 6 points ago +6 / -0

Who was the one who laughed at Piton?! We need their office number and we should overload their phone with demands they do their job and show We the People the respect owed.

1
Pla-ket-ket 1 point ago +1 / -0

It will work short term too when they see a steep drop of income.

23
Pla-ket-ket 23 points ago +23 / -0

Small addition:

This is not a circus. This is the will of the people, whom you work for, demanding you investigate immediately. Not later when it is too late.

4
Pla-ket-ket 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cuomo is a self righteous asshole in this interview. There is plenty of proof, why didn’t you guy bring up MI, PA, NV, AZ, WI, GA. We have proof. It’s all broken up so the pieces get broke up and shrugged off as not substantial; until you add up all the pieces. Then it’s substantial. We have the final report from Amistad Project report. The discovery of 68% error rate in MI. A 70% error rate in Nevada. A 94% adjudication rate in GA. Col Waldren’s expert analysis. Thousands of swore affidavits. We have proof. They willfully turn a blind eye.

1
Pla-ket-ket 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sec 9 states “no prior notice”. He may deliver it, but I’m not sure we’ll get the contents until after it’s effects have be enacted. I watched “The Plot Against the President” and they recount how in an F_BI meeting with Flynn they guy said to his face “there’s nothing here.” We all know what they did to Flynn. Saying nothing to see here, doesn’t mean there’s nothing.

by BuyPepe
2
Pla-ket-ket 2 points ago +2 / -0

Won’t be out of the blue to us 😀.

by BuyPepe
4
Pla-ket-ket 4 points ago +4 / -0

I won’t be surprised if we don’t see the details until after it’s acted upon. Sec 9 “no prior notice”.

2
Pla-ket-ket 2 points ago +2 / -0

It won’t protect him from the storm. He will be held accountable.

2
Pla-ket-ket 2 points ago +2 / -0

I immediately thought of Super Troopers.

view more: Next ›