3
PlanTruster 3 points ago +6 / -3

Media can blame whoever. Q has been a steady stream of nonsense for morons

1
PlanTruster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Knock it off quck, atheists are great at spotting golden idols

1
PlanTruster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did Durham ever say it was expanding or give any kind of update?

2
PlanTruster 2 points ago +7 / -5

Qtards have always been a spikeable nuisance

0
PlanTruster 0 points ago +4 / -4

They were nuts years before that

4
PlanTruster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Welp, this isn’t going to work without a MAGA party. Trump picking RINOs that are nice to him won’t be a success. They will all just show up in Congress and follow Mitch’s orders

2
PlanTruster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Libertarianism is just undiagnosed oppositional defiant disorder

1
PlanTruster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well no I’m not speculating at all. Cultures worldwide achieved enlightenment periods without the influence of Catholicism. Western civilization is pagan Greek/Roman culture

1
PlanTruster 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was possible throughout the world without the patronage of the Catholic Church. While some civilizations were in a dark ages, others were experiencing an enlightenment

2
PlanTruster 2 points ago +3 / -1

His Constitutional Traditionalism was pretty silly too. It’s like saying the Constitution isn’t open to interpretation while you are trying to interpret what the founders intended at the time. Just interpretation with a extra step

1
PlanTruster 1 point ago +3 / -2

You can have modern science without the Catholicism though

12
PlanTruster 12 points ago +12 / -0

He likes to drink, he’s a federalist society activist, he’s not a good lawyer, he does what the GOP wants.

Investigation closed

2
PlanTruster 2 points ago +2 / -0

All from the Federalist society, all GOP establishment activist judges

1
PlanTruster 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the states scheduled an election, that part is over. Right, the only option is the 2024 election

0
PlanTruster 0 points ago +1 / -1

He’s not. What are those dates

1
PlanTruster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. The constitution doesn’t say anything about what you have mentioned. You can vote for Trump in 2024. Everything else is unhealthy fantasy

2
PlanTruster 2 points ago +2 / -0

What? I know you aren’t referring to me. You can show me where the constitution allows for do overs in Presidential elections if you like

-1
PlanTruster -1 points ago +3 / -4

No, doesn’t matter. The electoral votes is all that matters. After that a new President has power through the constituent

-5
PlanTruster -5 points ago +2 / -7

Vote for him in 2024. There is nothing in the constitution allowing him to return to office before then

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›