Where's that tough guy who shouts in the face of people in the crowd?
Next week they could all be asking for free money like Iran.
I forgot to mention...
The top election audit expert in Arizona contacted the Senate by email offering to help. They did not even receive a reply.
This allegation was made on a radio broadcast by Bill Risener, the attorney for Audit USA with John Brakey.
Brakey is not some new celebrity or YouTube personality like Jovan Pulitzer. Brakey has been an elections activist for 17 years, mostly in AZ, but also across America.
Audit USA is bipartisan and gets results. They even get laws changed, including access to ballot images. They have sued Maricopa County to get copies of the ballot images in the 2020 election.
To follow their case, the docket link is:
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=+LC2021-000074
If you were Karen Fann, had no experience in election integrity, but had to audit an entire county, and the top election integrity expert in Arizona contacted you, what would you do?
Ask him to oversee the entire audit? Or not even reply?
I don't think anyone should expert much from her efforts. If a proper forensic audit is going to happen, it will be by Audit USA, or the AG, or something similar.
The way it looks as if there is going to be a forensic audit done on ballots in Georgia is not through the senate there, or the AG, but an elections integrity activist, Garland Favorito. Like Brakey, he is bipartisan and has about 17 years experience. Unlike Fann, Favorito understands election fraud, knows how to investigate, and is motivated.
Why doesn't Fann hire Favorito? Or Brakey? Or both?
Biden has Jimmy Carter level strength.
I agree she wouldn't know much based on her background. The thing, though, is she needs to learn at least enough to know whom to hire, and whom not to hire. They should hire ASOG and another auditor so there are matching (confirming) results. This is a basic auditing concept that another senator said was the initial plan, but Fann never said it is her plan. So she may not even understand general auditing principles, let alone specific technical election auditing.
The other problem is she is being asked to do a prosecutor's job. This really should be investigated by the AG (or FBI if it wasn't corrupt). She doesn't have any instincts of a detective or a prosecutor. She wants to draft laws, not send crooks to prison. Maybe she'll mess it up so badly the AG feels compelled to intervene and get it right. She may even go soft assuming the AG will file a case anyway, so there's no need for her to be thorough, aggressive, and controversial.
Even if the senate does a "forensic audit," so weak most of us cringe, the AG will probably have to do its own proper forensic audit, because the AG knows what evidence is needed for a successful prosecution; whereas Fann does not. The AZ AG could hire ASOG even if Fann doesn't.
Karen Fann is clueless.
So far I've only heard her talk about doing a 'forensic audit of ballots.' But she was very vague and superficial.
She also didn't say, "We aren't just recounting the ballots."
"And what specifically is your audit looking for?" asked Christina Bobb (OANN).
"We are looking for... as we said... the first thing is verifying that the machines work, that the ballots were put in correctly. Make sure all of the logistics there happened. And then we can go through and look at, um... the right paper.
[That is a logic and accuracy test!]
"Were the markings correct? Does it look as if there was any tampering off. Do the numbers all match up?
"If there's possible... can we do some signature matching up? Most of the envelopes are separated, but we can do some.
"We want to do it by batches by different district--by different voting districts."
Does that sound to you like somebody who knows what the hell she's doing?
She said she's got a stack of papers this thick of all the research she's done.
Seriously? How can she claim she's done so much research and then give the reporter such a weak answer!?
Not once did she cite one specific election fraud claim from the Arizona senate hearing that started the investigation!
Anyone in the senate who talks about doing a forensic audit in Arizona without talking about doing a fraction magic fraud forensic audit is still clueless.
This is a computer-based fraud, not a paper-based fraud. It's fraction magic (Dr. Shiva explained) and adjudication fraud. The physical ballots should be the last part of the conversation and investigation, not the first.
Georgia, it looks like, is about to do a ballot fraud forensic audit. It's not through their senate, but an activist organization, whose leader actually knows what a forensic audit looks like, and how to do one. Arizona may need the same. I hope AZ leaders are closely following Georgia so they will know what to do.
Here's an update:
Nobody in the senate or giving updates from Arizona has said they are going to do more than a recount.
Why? Is this a communication oversight or because they don't know the difference between a recount and an audit?
The biggest communication failure so far is no details on what a forensic audit is and what it isn't, and what the senate forensic audit will entail exactly.
It's all fine if they say, 'We're not doing a logic and accuracy test.' But they're not going to be much better than the supervisors if all they do is a recount.
Georgia did a logic and accuracy test and a recount. Is Arizona going to do better?
I can't remember any Arizona senators talking technical details of forensic audits in specific categories; e.g: ballot fraud, voter registration fraud, computer fraud, chain of custody fraud, let alone fraction magic fraud.
When did you ever hear Senators Karen Fann, Kelly Townsend, or Sonny Borrelli talking about fraction fraud? GOP's Kelli Ward? Anyone?
It'd be great if you could contact him. I was trying to find his contact info but haven't yet.
When he does a livestream on YouTube he enables chat and does interact.
In his recent livestream he asked for help, so I'd assume he'd be looking for responses.
"Help Request-Need Computer Programmer to write code...."
He did reply in the Comments below this episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEydfdTDR-o
P.S. He does have an account here on this site but he doesn't visit as much anymore.
P.P.S. I may know somebody who has his contact info. I'll see if I can get it.
Solomon on a coffee break is a dangerous man! 😁
https://youtu.be/i1N5bn4TJes?t=669 (TimeStamped)
Solomon is running into software problems. The program he was using is crashing from the heavy load of his extremely serious calculations. He has asked for help.
Watching him run simple calculations in Google Sheets with copy and paste, etc., you feel bad for the guy. He stays up all night doing the same thing one small step at a time.
Where are the software engineers who can build the poor guy a program?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zz2pmfLhYA
"Every vote for Biden had the exact same bubble mark."
The story at the time was she was a Democrat who said/believed you had to act like a Republican to get anywhere in GA politics, and she ran the guy's office.
Well, we all knew Biden wasn't all there...
He's about a dollar short of a full stimulus check...
AI Biden inbound...
Good interview. Lots of MAGA ENERGY!
"Mitch McConnell made a tremendous mistake. He lost those two seats!"
She trusts Democrat media more than Trump.
You Michiganders are so unlucky to be ruled by three nasty Jezebels: Jocelyn Benson, Gretchen Whitmer and Dana Nessel.
Who is going to make a conservative version of Proton mail?
"Don't complain. Build."
Move to Switzerland. Build. Rough life. LoL!
"I see what you did there."
LoL!
Heh. I was just thinking of getting a second account. Thanks for the post.
This reminds me of when the judge ordered the power off at Fox News and we joined TDW.
LoL!
Lame for ducking Putin.
Only a few months into his residency and already he's a Lame Duck "president."