Jack Sellers' credibility just got shredded.
If Ducey doesn't condemn, so does his credibility.
How about Karen Fann steps aside so Borrelli can run the show? Elections are a national security issue. I'd rather have a former Marine giving orders than a former mayor.
Write to the AG and express your support for a full forensic investigation ASAP.
https://www.azag.gov/contact-us
Tell him if he does the right thing, and cleans out the voting systems in AZ, you'll vote for him to replace Ducey as Governor!
(Ducey has less than 2 yrs left and can't run again because of term limits.)
The country was already torn.
Cucked people fear confrontation. GOP is full of wimps.
Trump was spammed for four years with Fake Russian Collusion Spam. He should spam the Democrats for four years with Election Fraud Truth. Every day.
Welcome to the oligarchy of the nerds. (amgreatness.com)
Don't use soft language favorable to the enemies of America.
She “does not listen to others’ opinions and really take those on board,” “I found that working with her could be really difficult, that she doesn’t really collaborate well, and doesn’t work to build consensus,” West said.
Translation: She's a sociopath.
Socialists = Sociopaths
Beware the tyrannies!
"Social media"?
Anti-social media
Fixed.
She's a genius. Give her top position.
Racism Spam.
Where's the spam blocker?
problem is that the media won’t talk about it and the left won’t care
The left do care; that's why they won't talk about it.
How many is too many, Mr. Cuomo?
Fair question for covid deaths in NY, too.
Braynard with the proof. Everyone else with evidence and suspicions.
The software should not be certified without an official adjudication log. Incredible that anyone certified it without it as a requirement. And no politicians--the ones who are not crooked--didn't question if there was an official adjudication log. Especially when there are scanned images.
Every adjudicated ballot image should have an uneditable log with:
- Ballot image/number
- Adjudicator name, Party 1
- Adjudicator name, Party 2
It's not difficult to program this, is it?
I wish I could sit down with Sen. Townsend and ask her about the election law on this point of adjudication oversight. And what she looked for when the voting machine company made its presentation to her.
Recorder Richer Statement on 2020 General Election Ballots
Since Saturday, I have been working to get to the bottom of the accusations recently leveled against the Recorder's Office and the Maricopa County Elections Department. On Friday, two individuals visited the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center ("MCTEC") during working hours to ask for voter registration forms and to take pictures from the outside.
On Saturday, one of these individuals returned, accompanied by two others. Camera footage shows that those three attempted to unlawfully pry open our warehouse doors, but were unsuccessful. They did, however, climb into the dumpster outside the building and remove trash.
My office, the Maricopa County Elections Department, and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors all have the same goal: to continue to have safe and secure elections. That is why the Board of Supervisors conducted two independent audits on the tabulation equipment, and that is why my office aspires to be as open and transparent as possible.
What we cannot have, and what nobody should be comfortable with, is individuals attempting to break into secure facilities potentially interrupting the legal processes currently underway, as well as an election currently in process for the City of Goodyear.
I want to be very clear: I can say with 100% certainty that the 2.1 million legally voted ballots from the November General Election are safe and accounted for in the Elections Department vault, under 24/7 surveillance.
Here are additional facts: none of the ballots stored in the vault have been unsealed or shredded. Not one. Every single ballot of the 2.1 million November General Election ballots that were tabulated have been held securely and the chain of custody has never been broken.
I do not know what was in the yellow bags that have appeared in photos online because I have not seen the contents of these bags. After speaking with the voter registration team, I've confirmed that we shred a variety of non-classified documents.
In addition, we also destroy deceased voter ballots since they could never be legally tabulated. I am a firm believer in continuous improvement, and I, along with my staff, will review this office's past practices, and best practices from other counties, to make sure we are not only following the law, but also implementing strong document retention and disposal policies.
Pictures:
Well basically, the algorithm of ranked choice voting (fractional voting) is for obfuscation, the ballot switching was done in adjudication. Adjudication has long since been done for decades, but Dominion promised the fastest adjudication method ever. All they did was send the ballots in adjudication to a central server and have bad actors in other countries manipulate these votes- that’s why you had “glitches”.
What did the sellers of the system tell the buyers? Didn't the buyers ask if the adjudication would be by two people, one Democrat, one Republican, the same as when votes on paper ballots are disputed? Doesn't every disputed ballot require a log showing which D and which R adjudicated it? Is there really no adjudication log? Isn't it fundamentally unconstitutional for any disputed ballot to be adjudicated by only one person? To say nothing of adjudication by a foreign adjudicator.
Paper ballots are what computer and security experts recommend. Most countries are paper only.
Votes are cast by manually marking ballots in 209 of the 227 countries and territories for which the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network has data.
Why does it seem that every voting system is compromisable?
Under the U.S. system it's easy to cheat and difficult to audit. It should be difficult to cheat and easy to audit.
I'm not an election historian, but from the little I've read, it seems politicians either deliberately voted for systems they knew could be rigged, or they simply didn't bother to ask, "How easily could this system be exploited?"
The data security experts have been warning about non-paper systems for many years (15+). Politicians don't bother to do their homework at even the most basic level.
Arizona Sen. Kelly Townsend, who I actually respect more than most Arizona senators, admitted on video she never would have approved the non-paper system current being used if she had known it was easy to exploit and difficult to audit.
Chuck Hagel is responsible for most of the mess in America now. If you ever read the story on the Black Box Voting website, it reveals he was running a voting system company before he ran for office. He won twice in upset landslides. After that the same system became more popular across America.
It's a case of the crooked (Hagels) and the ignorant (Townsends).
How much is grandma worth?
Georgia is a state that needs some work. We need a good strategy. Writing and calling works when the politicians aren't sociopaths. I don't yet know what the right strategy is, but somebody probably does.
Ideally the state law has to change to block systems easily manipulated and audited with difficulty. The governor can't veto it.
Georgia: Governor must veto bills within six days after “transmittal” from legislature or they automatically become law. That time frame is extended to 40 days after adjournment before bills automatically become law. Legislators can call a special session to override a veto with a 2/3rd vote of both chambers.
https://info.cq.com/resources/state-by-state-guide-to-gubernatorial-veto-types/
So ultimately you need a governor who is based, not using a rigging system for himself, either to win his own election, or get money from kickbacks.
This is the challenge in Arizona. Even if you get many legislators drafting a pro-citizen election system reform bill, Ducey will get it on his desk, and say, "No, I like my kickbacks. I love money."
Favorito explained that he’d been challenging Georgia’s electronic voting systems since 2002 with the implementation of Diebold DRE system.
For 17 years, Favorito alleged that the system was “not verifiable, auditable, and [not] recount capable,” and was ignored by the Secretary of State’s office and Georgia Supreme Court.
Then, in 2019, Favorito explained that the U.S. District Court agreed that the Diebold systems were unconstitutional.
That decision led to the Secretary of State’s office to purchase the Democracy Suite 5.5 BMD system from D$%*&^$n Voting Systems.
Now the GOP, led by Dr. Kelli Ward, is looking at replacing D$%*&^$n with Voatz. She is slowly introducing Voatz, without naming it. So far she is luring Republicans in Arizona to accept the idea of "blockchain." Guess who uses blockchain?
Kelli Ward isn't the only GOP person in AZ doing this. There's another one too.
Companies that get in trouble sell their assets to companies with a different name, so everybody thinks it's "all safe now."
The principles and practices don't change. Somehow Joe Citizen never notices and they elect the same people.
A commercial version is available but its YT demo is very short.