1
PoohClimbsTrees 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get your point and explained.

You just said they betrayed Us and the country.

President Trump is one of us.

Hence they betrayed him too. Is that more clear?

No matter how you want to dice it, they betrayed President Trump and everything he stood for.

1
PoohClimbsTrees 1 point ago +1 / -0

He stood(stands for Law and Order.

He appointed them because he thought they did too.

They betrayed him and us, it has nothing to do with personal loyalty and all about Law and order. Just like they betrayed every lae abiding American.

0
PoohClimbsTrees 0 points ago +1 / -1

But, I completely disagree with this idea that 'Trump's Picks' betrayed him...

Easy to prove. All three failed and betrayed him and us. They could have gotten the case heard. They fucked us all.

The Rule of 4: The rule of four is a Supreme Court of the United States practice that permits four of the nine justices to grant a writ of certiorari. This is done specifically to prevent a majority of the Court from controlling the Court's docket.

46
PoohClimbsTrees 46 points ago +46 / -0

Like it matters who replaces him. It only takes 4 to accept a case. 2 of President Trump's 3 picks betrayed him and us on this case. All 3 have already. Democrats already own 6 of 9. They just ensured election fraud is legal. The Supreme Court is already gone, replacing one of the 2 decent ones won't matter either way.

5
PoohClimbsTrees 5 points ago +5 / -0

Gorsuch too. The GEOTUS put them on the court KNOWING this battle was coming. They failed us, they failed America. The left has successfully made the constitution just another piece of paper. If the constitution is not valid, not a single law in the Banana Republic is valid.

63
PoohClimbsTrees 63 points ago +63 / -0

Only 1 single other justice would have had to want to take take case and it would be heard.

Kavanaugh fucked us!

ACB fucked us!

We had their backs and they stabbed us in ours .

The rule of four is a Supreme Court of the United States practice that permits four of the nine justices to grant a writ of certiorari. This is done specifically to prevent a majority of the Court from controlling the Court's docket.

13
PoohClimbsTrees 13 points ago +13 / -0

Only 1 single other justice would have had to want to take take case and it would be heard.

Kavanaugh fucked us!

ACB fucked us!

We had their backs and they stabbed us in ours.

The rule of four is a Supreme Court of the United States practice that permits four of the nine justices to grant a writ of certiorari. This is done specifically to prevent a majority of the Court from controlling the Court's docket.

2
PoohClimbsTrees 2 points ago +2 / -0

The corruption in the DoJ has been clearly evident for years and no one does anything about it.

Every branch of our government seems corrupt and/or inept.

Why can't people get a refund for stock losses? - Mad Maxine.

7
PoohClimbsTrees 7 points ago +7 / -0

Look up the Rule of 4.

At least 6 Justices failed us completely.

The rule of four is a Supreme Court of the United States practice that permits four of the nine justices to grant a writ of certiorari. This is done specifically to prevent a majority of the Court from controlling the Court's docket.

1
PoohClimbsTrees 1 point ago +1 / -0

My wife bought Pepsi today, first time in well over a decade.

All I did was show her the Tweet with the info.

2
PoohClimbsTrees 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Your attacks were not just made against Republicans. There were vicious attacks made against progressives, people who I have worked with,” he said.

That statement says it all. Democrats would be 100% fine with her if the attacks were only against Republicans.

3
PoohClimbsTrees 3 points ago +3 / -0

Check their wording...it makes your headline inaccurate...however your headline is EXACTLY what they want you to think.

Always watch the wording....sneaky fucks!

the video and images attributed to a Coca-Cola training program are not part of the company’s learning curriculum

Notice they don't say it has never been part of their curriculum.

This statement basically says It was part of our curriculum, but due to blowback we just removed it

8
PoohClimbsTrees 8 points ago +8 / -0

Always watch the wording....sneaky fucks!

the video and images attributed to a Coca-Cola training program are not part of the company’s learning curriculum

Notice they don't say it has never been part of their curriculum.

This statement basically says It was part of our curriculum, but due to blowback we just removed it

1
PoohClimbsTrees 1 point ago +1 / -0

With whites as the reference group, the odds of consuming soda was 3.1 times higher for U.S.-born blacks (95% CI 2.6–3.7), 2.4 times higher for Puerto Ricans (95% CI 1.9–3.0), and 2.9 times higher for Mexican/Mexican-Americans (95% CI 2.0–4.1).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2329746/

1
PoohClimbsTrees 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is why they don't care.

With whites as the reference group, the odds of consuming soda was *3.1 times higher for U.S.-born blacks, 2.4 times higher for Puerto Ricans, and 2.9 times higher for Mexican/Mexican-Americans

3
PoohClimbsTrees 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Gorilla Glue lady is a 40 year old school teacher.

How fucking scary is that?

Can you imagine having a child in her class?

0
PoohClimbsTrees 0 points ago +2 / -2

I see your panties are still ruffled.

Do you actually contribute to this site or just bitch about it?

❄🤡👋

view more: Next ›