2
Potatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

At this point hope just prevents action. Take action, and if there is some sort of plan it will happen anyway.

5
Potatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hold on there. It is a hypothetical scenario that Superman lands in Soviet Russia instead of US. They use him as an evil weapon. It actually is about the evils of communism.

3
Potatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is difficult when you are being gas lit. What aren’t we seeing? Who is being paid? Who was a plant from the start? Who is being threatened or blackmailed?

The enemy uses tactics we won’t use because the tactics aren’t ethical. The downside to these tactics? They ALWAYS get exposed eventually. Evil can’t mask itself forever. Bad things will likely happen before then, but it will eventually become clear for most to see. It is also why we don’t use these tactics.

7
Potatriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

No point if these people get power. He won THIS election, how would a future one be different?

2
Potatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Really? That is absurd! Not a GA resident so not sure I can sign it, but wow, that is nefarious shit!

1
Potatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Says site is blocked due to malware

3
Potatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Didn’t he say there was no way he’d be okay with the “Trump vaccine”?

0
Potatriot 0 points ago +1 / -1

So....this is one we should stop using. The full context of the video and interview is in regard to preventing voter fraud. While he is clearly lying, this clip is not good evidence and is similar to the the MSM taking Trump out of context.

0
Potatriot 0 points ago +1 / -1

Certainly possible. I’m pointing out more that the water marks do actually exist. On what scale or how they are utilized I don’t know and don’t have evidence.

1
Potatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know....they utilize water marks in some form or fashion and for the purpose of authentication. How it works or they expect to utilize it I don’t know. But this confirms simply that watermarks do exist on ballots.

2
Potatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

It would be cool. I’m not super convinced, but at least this confirms water marks exist as a form of authentication.

1
Potatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know. All I could find is that they exist and some ballots have them. How many, where and if it is a “sting” I don’t know. But it isn’t at least AS far fetched as it was before. It exists.

1
Potatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thoughts? If only some of them have it, how does it work? I’ve been hopeful and skeptical of the whole watermark story

2
Potatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is from their site. Also it is discoverable from their “fixing rumors” post.