2
PotentPotable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was asking because I am from Morgantown

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't seem to understand that everyone here enjoys this. I recommend that you do the things that you enjoy too. I can't imagine you fill your life with trying to ruin other people's happiness

5
PotentPotable 5 points ago +5 / -0

Which part of WV?

3
PotentPotable 3 points ago +4 / -1

I beg to differ. it isn't just a piece of paper. it is the preservation of the idea of a better life. the people that are old enough in this .win CAN remember better times in America. That "parchment" is the recorded idea of how we can get back on track if we fall off. that "parchment" understands the value of a nobody. and that "parchment" helps us to remember our past.

2
PotentPotable 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's because there farmers are peasants. their university educated students don't attend class and buy their degree. it's quite sad. a country of "highly educated" who have little knowledge of anything

2
PotentPotable 2 points ago +3 / -1

if this isn't enjoyable, you can always leave

3
PotentPotable 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know a few months ago, Putin, refused delivery of a defense weapons system to China. As for the Russian people, most are pretty based. they just have little ability to change anything. This girl I worked with was cool. her family listened to 70s and 80s rock and they made moonshine. the best part, these are the city people. haha. but yea, they don't like Chinese people.

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am trying to verify,. google is down? how about youtube? I am trying to eck on my parents and I am outside the US. can anyone verify if WhatsApp is working?

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

and that's where this is a good thing. normally, you can't send new evidence to the SC. but with this ruling, we can tack fraud on another claim when it becomes a federal case. and with the SC clarification on personal lawsuits against the government employees, I think the SC told everyone to file a claim against your local legislators for allowing another person to do their job and the damage is the resulting fraud that occurred

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't disagree with what you are saying. I am saying that SC said that the violation hasn't happened federally yet for Texas to file and therefor moot. if someone wants to file that is currently effected, send that person forward

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

and right, with the appointment of the electors, the legislators have the duty to contest it within their state. but they aren't. it seems more like people didn't actually qualify to perform their jobs. this could be the recent law suit. the SC just ruled that people can sue individuals within the government. sue your legislators to file a claim against the electoral votes

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

right. but the path that Texas took keeps this as a hypothetical crime until it becomes a federal crime. people within the state of PA can make a claim until a reason falls under article 3. at that point, the states can file a new claim and personally, CA is looking good for this. unless they file within the state first

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

He can bring on behalf of the state when this becomes a situation where his state is federally involved. right now, only the internal workings of these states are involved. when the electoral votes are cast, this becomes a federal issue.
imagine me filing a suit for a sexual offender in PA and I am from West Virginia. I am not directly effected by the inner workings of the state. in this case, the DA and the victim can file.
yesterday, we found out that the victim in PA can file a claim AND the legislators because laws were made without their permission. once the electoral votes are cast, it becomes a federal case. but the evidence can be used in the SC from a different filing

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Texas also doesnt have a statute that gives them the privilege to contest...... what I mean is that Texas wasn't appointed to contest the popular vote, the legislators have that right. if they feel the state broke the law, they should file a suit

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

that would be cool. if you can confirm, can you let me know. also, there was a ruling yesterday about lawsuits against people in the government. I think that applies somewhere for the end result of all this but I can't find the article

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

right. the state legislators should be filing the law suit that Texas filed.

1
PotentPotable 1 point ago +1 / -0

no there is no current reason for everyone to be upset?

view more: Next ›