Search is probably the single most expensive feature for a site like this in terms of server cost. Don't ask the admin team to put a second note on their house so you can have a more convenient browsing experience.
You'll excuse me if I don't take the word of the dude that literally applied a BRC promo code (as part of Blaze, Elijah is sponsered by BRC) to a photo of Kyle and triggered this whole black hole to begin with. This just feels like damage control from Blaze to save a sponsor.
These "Cruz missiles" are all propellant, no warhead.
Lemme know when he attends a Stop the Steal rally, or actually does something of value other than being a replyboi.
Well, because they weren't.
Trump came out early with the whole "its not a big deal", just like everyone else, then libs started the Rahm Emanuel playbook " never let a tragedy go to waste" and decided this was the perfect play to fuck over Trump.
So now, the Don is left with two options: Call this flu what it is, stick to his guns, and get every death from every cause firmly placed around his neck, basically guaranteeing he loses the election, or, go along with the crazy, put it all on the governors, take minimal blowback, and win it.
It came down to a simple question: Do I let the country bleed, or do I let the country die?
Its a shitty choice, but he probably made the right one.
Reading through it and I guess TD.win was the Kraken all along... Most of this evidence came from this site.
Its like winning the gold medal at the special olympics. Congrats Joe, you're king of the retards.
OP - I feel like you didnt take away the intent of the writer there.
Yes, members of the US military (through USEUCOM) seized a server in Germany while attached to some federal law enforcement that, based on the writers sources, was neither the FBI or the CIA, as he implies they could not be trusted. The server seized was, again based on the writers sources, a CIA server, but that doesnt mean that it doesnt contain Sctly or Dominion data. In fact, the author makes it pretty clear he believes it does.
So, it's a semantics argument. Was it a Dominion or Scytl server? By ownership, probably not. Did it contain the same data as if it were? Per the writer, possibly. Was the military used in some fashion, in Germany, to seize a server from someone? Per the writer, yes.
Guess we'll see what the end result is.
If they dont have a legal chain of custody, they are invalid.
Just throwing it out there that as long as the investigation is open, no charges are brought, and that could basically be forever. Also, immunity is a thing for when they get pushed to charge someone. Note that he "and his associates" are under investigation. It's super easy for the DOJ to say that Hunter provided them information about some rando ChiCom asset that was "a major threat to national security" and let him walk.
I told you guys that OBL thing was a lefty PsyOp
I mean yea, there's a lot of issues there, the first of which being that Google as a company uses more internalized languages, tools, policies and practices, than any other teach company on Earth, which only makes the obfuscation harder.
I don't actually believe anyone in the US government, and very few people out of the government, could accurately audit Search as a complete system; My perspective was simply "this is technically possible without attempting to derive human interpretative data from the training data". That concept working in practice is requisite on the company and employees not attempting to disrupt what needs to be an effectively clean environment, and if they were willing to train it biased, why would that same bias not transfer to obfuscating the effort?
RINO Roberts is exactly why the dems started down the "lock everything down, mass corruption, mail-in-vote" path. Fill that seat.
Is, but that's bad for his business model, so he swallows it.
I feel like it's yes and no. I agree that auditing the code would probably only yield how the training data is interpreted, but the live training data running against a limited subset of results, one limited set for each party with positive and negative slanting articles , would probably output dramatically different results. At least to me, that's enough.
You can't get a criminal conviction here anyway, it's a private company, but it would be enough to prove to most people that it's training was inherently biased,and that's pretty much the only win you could get here.
Yea, but they're also probably going to edit it to be super-woke, so, not a total loss.
The irony is, if he gets out, this "security guard" is probably going to have to hire his own with as hot as he is seen right now.
Justice Thomas is on record stating what he would like to see in a 230-related case. Makes the atmosphere at the state/federal court level much more interesting than the standard "there is no precedent to defy 230 immunity".
"Always bet on stupid" - Democrats
why do I feel like James Woods has a chart for Weenie Waggers to back this data up 😂
Waiting on the Hollywood celebrity montage video somehow trying to make this about the sadness of drug addiction and how evil Trump is.
You're assuming that a power bottom can ever become a top.
All I can say here is any American advocating for Trump to be more "presidential" is actually either asking for one of two things:
"Gentleman's combat", which doesn't exist, politics and diplomacy are a blood sport. It used to be a hidden knife fight behind a smile, all Trump did was shoot the guy in the face and show everyone what was actually happening behind the curtain.
Or a return to Obama briefings, which while eloquent, were fundamentally deceptive to the American people.
So no matter how your opinion shakes out, you're asking to be coddled, or you're shortsighted.
Any person who throws a line out like "this is good Trump, this is bad Trump" and 'Bad Trump' was just pearl clutching is intentionally trying to drive a wedge against Trump. It's not a legitimate grievance if you actually understand the plays.
Some poor 18 year old edgelord is gonna vote for him, and 30 years later the campaign ad against him running is going to be "Johnny Smith literally voted for Cancer, do you support Cancer? Johnny Smith does"
Might have something to do with the worlds largest polluter shutting down for only a month to show all their lackeys how to control their population, then promptly kicking all foreign media out of their country, the media going along with that, and going on with their day, declaring victory to a critical audience of none.