Did he say he never had sex with her though.
And he was dropping retirement earlier in the day. So I’m going to wait and see on this.
Do people here remember the Patrick Byrne story.
They do this all the time.
I’m not 100% sure I believe Gaetz as why drop a retirement rumor if you’re innocent.
That being said FBI likes to do bribes with wires then bring as many people into the room as possible.
Then they can selectively interpret evidence based on who they need to leverage for power.
See the Trump adoption meeting as well.
You got one thing wrong.
Its not fear of inflation.
It's literal high rate inflation. It's everywhere. The government number is a joke and has been for like 20 years. Particularly now though, its never been more obvious.
Its not just gas or construction goods, you can see it in semiconductors, services, food, housing prices, furniture, stock prices, everything.
Look at those prices and ask yourself one simple question. With a supposed consumer price index annual rise of 1.4% which goods or services dropped in price in the last year to offset the broad rise in consumer costs outlined above?
Yeah.
No, that's not inverse. That's just the status quo.
Inverse would be giving Gym memberships for purposefully spreading the virus around.
It's an important distinction because it correctly defines what is extreme behavior.
Looks like I offended the FBI demoralization team. I even got exactly 6 downvotes deep in a thread. I'm shocked!
When making a post such as OP's, the burden of providing legitimate sources of the information provided falls on the poster, not the readers.
No, when posting here there's typically zero burden whatsoever.
The "burden" you speak of is entirely imagined, created via wholly imagined social pressures. If any social burden does exist though it is certainly that non lazy people on the right have the mental capacity to follow sourcing to its natural conclusion.
That's the difference here. There's no leftists around to claim victimhood because I didn't do their research job for them.
Except for yourself apparently.
Furthermore the initial source was provided here multiple times. Did that stop you and your friends from demanding additional (fucking direct, no less) sources which were impossible to provide? No, of course not. Because as I correctly stated initially, this is an influence game you're attempting to play.
You're not looking for sources, which are typically provided thoroughly and quickly. You're looking to question legitimate information you already know to be correct.
It is quite reasonable and even encouraged in that place we call reality (I know that's a foreign land to you) to respectfully request sources which lend credence to any claims made.
It's also quite reasonable to explain yourself or defend yourself when legitimate claims are made of obvious repeated destructive behavior. But you'd rather namecall instead. Because THAT screams "reasonable and respectful".
Great job holding that moral high ground position. You're so much better than me!
Go ahead and reply again. I cherish another opportunity like the last one you provided.
There is so much bullshit information floating around everywhere
Spoken like a foreigner interfering in American politics.
Or we could stay and influence the army from within.
There’s nothing wrong with our ideology.
The people who wish to corrupt an organized military with destructive social marxism should be the ones to leave.
Why are there so many shills here pushing defeatism.
“Democrats cheated in Michigan so I’m never going to vote again in Oklahoma”
“The GOP sucks so we should all leave it and let them keep the money we have them.”
This type of nonsense marginalizes us.
If you see a problem get involved and participate in the solution.
Democrats love to promote laziness on the right to win via demoralization. The low energy shit needs to stop.
No.
Every single person here has the internet and the capability to research this background personally.
There’s no Reddit army here claiming that personally provided direct and named sources are the only way to be correct.
The original link was provided. The only reason to cry about this this is to undermine claims you find problematic.
And the Politifact sourcing army appears to have upvoted you with their usual 6-10 quick hits to give you visibility.
It’s the same game here over and over.
I mean this really is kind of dooming.
The situation with Florida is twofold.
The first is that they were able to fix their voting systems with common sense and practical solutions after the 2000 election.
The second is that they have state implemented policy which does a good job of policing that system.
I’m not saying screaming states rights is the solution to 2020.
But I think if states want an example of how to implement something which works then yes, Florida is a good example.
And yes implementation of voting is a right of states.
If you want to prevent the next 2020 implementing these kinds of responses on a state by state basis is an excellent start.
The fact that libs freaked out over Georgia absolutely confirms this.
I don’t really understand this notion here of demanding we run before we crawl here.
Immediate action is great but let’s just at least take proper systematic steps toward fixing a multitude of issues instead of crying about cheating over and over while doing nothing meaningful.
It’s ok to complain at times. But don’t take your eye off the ball because something terrible happened.
Oh my bad.
This should be. “You other people who do this thing which I do not participate in should have done something first!”
“Maybe if everyone else did this thing then I would do it too!”
Did anyone say this is real or are you just creating that straw man in order to pretend to be snopes?
You that desperate to cheat on your wife with a fat porn star?
Just saying, this guy would rather pay a set of layers 10 million to challenge the federal government in an endless back and forth in courtrooms for the next 4 years.
While instead that 10 million could be spent putting 20,000 of these people on planes with a 1 way ticket to the Washington DC area.
Like I said, get out commie.
Ok.
The by making non-specific claims about what is factual and what is not then you're admittedly providing misinformation.
Get out commie.
Go ahead and claim what is factual here.
Since you are in the business of being fair.
As someone with a "science background" why don't you address my simple question about if you created an alternative open list for everyone to examine and independently judge?
Was it too hard to read my comment and participate in the process you are virtue signaling for?
Why trot out your purported background in some self serving appeal to authority when you ignore a simple call to open and fair examination?
Sounds much more like censorship and politics than open and independent discussion.
If you get the sentiment why are you here taking a loser position by pretending to be politifact?
If you object have you created your own list of ingredients without the editorialization in order to let people see what is contained and to make their own decision?
Or are you just here to complain to create dissent.
Much of this is shitty. Not just politicians. And that's the problem.
What you're saying here isn't much further than the position John Roberts supposedly takes. They both are effectually stupid.
If they are making a point by selectively enforcing some law then respectfully what they should be doing is reexamining enforcement of all law and figuring out which laws are in the best public interest to enforce and apply those in a reasonable and efficient manner.
Or they can enforce all laws equally. We already know they don't enforce equally though across the board. So the former point needs to be taken into account.
Point taken but there's a difference between engagement and defensive debate.
It's perfectly fine to engage with these people to tell them you are about to go go shoot some dinner for instance.
The same way the left corrals people who believe socialism is a viable economic system and that 9/11 was a hoax.
Coming back to this days later.
I see you got some downvotes, not of my own accord.
You definitely need to assemble a group of people which allows you to win first.
Then you can be selective about who you want to align yourself with.
I'm perfectly fine with choosing these guys as allies as they have a default position which is distrustful of government. I won't always agree with them. But I know where they stand.
And yeah I don't know about this specific guy. But there are definitely shills who wander in here to say this every time there is a shooting. These kinds of comments are too retarded to be wholly organic.
Honestly Trump just pulling a John Kerry, giving no fucks and going there to "negotiate" would be a throw your big dick on the table move.
Shills saying this shit every time to make us look bad gets old fast.
You can say this about 9/11 or Vegas or anything else.
It's not like the government actually CARES about people.
So whats easier, actually killing a few people to achieve your goals, or enacting a conspiracy involving thousands of people and millions of dollars??
When you want to come back to reality and answer that question let us all know.
Reminded me of Patrick Byrne from Overstock.