The secret ingredient is crime.
It's fact checks all the way down
They're just gonna say "NoT rEaL sOcIaLiSm" and then make fun of it being a TP USA meme.
Literal 5 year olds could have a more intelligent take on this.
Nah, there was a lot of white stuff outside so he called it an early day.
At 8am.
"You can't say that, that's raycisss! REEEEEE!"
I'm sure Obama would LOVE to volunteer to have a migrant camp in his backyard.
Their fucking website icon is rainbow colored FFS
Needs more hammer and sickle.
TERFs are only anti-trans because they realize that trans "women" are trying to compete for their power, not because they fundamentally believe in science.
They are right, but for the wrong reasons.
For her 7 types of menstruation, of couse
This is the way.
It does not. I read the source code.
This is basically scientific astroturfing, read my explanation here.
Link for those who want to read this nonsense: https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/16/us/reparations-covid-black-americans-disparity-trnd/index.html
It's actually a real, published study, and surprisingly available in full text for free (usually these cites charge you anywhere from $30-50 to read a paper.
The important thing to understand is that these results are based purely on statistical modelling, as there is obviously no other way to do a "what if" study. Also, the study only looked at a single state, Louisiana, which historically had a lot of issues with race relations.
Meanwhile, the article makes it seems AS IF this is true in general, and every state would have seen lower COVID numbers among its black population if only reparations had been paid.
Basically, this is the typical scientific astroturfing the left likes to do – publish a very specific, purely theoretical paper, and then pass it off to the unsuspecting public with a broad statement such as "science shows that..." or "study finds that...", which feeds into people's confirmation bias and leads people who only read the headline to assume that the statement is true IN GENERAL, when it was barely "proven" to be true in a very specific, hypothetical scenario.
TL;DR: this is a purely hypothetical result based on statistical modelling, and only examines the numbers for a single state. It's basically scientific astroturfing.
There's a browser extension called Privacy Redirect that will automatically redirect all Twitter links to Nitter. Also redirects Youtube links to Invidious.
Deleted
Are they really called McBonuses?
No joke, that's like literally their hazing ritual.
To be fair, govtrack.us gives this bill about a 3% chance of actually passing, and this may be one of the reasons why. It's probably gonna die in some subcommittee.
Medium is just about the most cucked website on the Internet.