3
ProtectFreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

NOW it makes much more sensw when he was saying "Stop the count!" - without context, it sounded almost tantrum-like to a lot of people.

1
ProtectFreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have nothing in common with these people.

3
ProtectFreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Supposedly 1900 is the placeholder value. If you can find dead voters that are 1901 and later, those would be a much more compelling case.

1
ProtectFreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

1/1/1900 are the worst examples because it is supposedly the default birthdate number (and, yes, it's a REAL plausible answer)

Any other dates are a much better indicator.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
55
ProtectFreedom 55 points ago +56 / -1

Anyone checking names against dead people's names?

3
ProtectFreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Surely the FUCKING board of elections has called it, then?

1
ProtectFreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

It always came down to them.

0
ProtectFreedom 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've written AZ & NV off. We have to win GA, PA, and MI.

1
ProtectFreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Happy to see Texas trend back in the right direction. Any thoughts on NC?

5
ProtectFreedom 5 points ago +6 / -1

Virginia was never competitive.

2
ProtectFreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

We MUST WIN this election.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›