Boy you've made it abundantly clear you don't understand what philosophy is and you have a very narrow and biased opinion of what it is. I gave your ignorant ass several examples of the value of philosophy and yet you haven't been able to provide a single counter example. You're spending too much time with liberals if you think this is how you make a point.
You're dense aren't you? Brush up on your history because science initially was done to prove and disprove concepts philosophers in antiquity postulated as questions and often theorized the right answer without the scientific method. What do you think newton did when the apple fell on his head before he theorized gravity? Is that science or he philosophized why did this apple fall? When Eistein thought up the theory of relativity do you think he was just writing numbers on a chalkboard or he philosophized with the knowledge of his day and the past to derive his theory and then proved it. Thinking things out and rationalizing them is step one in the scientific process, that is philosophy. Just because you don't understand what philosophy is doesn't make it useless.
Now shooo and go take your covid shot..
Philosophers come up with the questions that mathematicians and scientists try to answer. Do you think a document such as the constitution cold have been written by mathmaticians or scientist or was it by philosophers?
Hell most of modern technology is dreamt out by writers before they're conceptualized or invented. Do you think Steve Jobs envisioned the iphone or he thought tricorders were cool and "hey i can make a hand held computer."
on and on. Philosophers have their place in society even if the majority want to sit around smoke pot and talk about gardening.
reading this makes me feel like telling a liberal to leave a car running in their garage for 2 hours and measure the temperature in that garage versus another garage where a car isn't running. If it's warmer in the garage with the running car then he should email scientists with his irrefutable proof that carbon drives global warming.
then explain why 90% of blacks voted democrat last election.....
5/10 should be using a mask
Whatever reason, nah because liberals are in complete power and nothing will be done about it. So now he can speak the truth without fear that something will be done about it.
He's just nero playing his harp as Rome* burns.
It's not the people it's the culture we have developed and incentivate to become mainstream since then
Most black people are not red pillable at all. Quit thinking they're going to be these reliable allies because they will never be. They're as grifted by consumerism and the media as the majority of women. You'll see a poor black person with a $300 pair of shoes the same way you'll see a poor woman with a Louis Vuitton bag. No self accountability and instant gratification mentality, the dems will always appeal to them with their gibs, get that through to you. They want the easy way and they know republicans want them to succeed not rely on handouts.
Do you just follow him, I've seen this giantrabbit than someone saying the same thing as you a few times. I think the false flag is you suckerz. BTW false flag can mean several things including false narrative driven by the msm.
Why do illegal mexicans do better than blacks?
They just want conflict so they can go loot in the other side of town
I don't think it was an accident as much as she using the only tool she had. Women cops either drop the fighting criminal or they'll lose their gun 9 out of 10 times. It's the convergence of women are equal and joggers are going to jog.
It's a woman police officer she got scared and she shot him, she could just as easily have shot the other police officer. This tragedy would be avoided if it wasn't clown world.
I've taken all my shots I even took yellow fever shot for a flight to the southern hemisphere no issue, but don't call me an anti vaxxer for not wanting to be the first in line for an experimental treatment shot which wouldn't even be considered an immunization shot under old standards.
In 2021 it's more likely for the U.S. to splinter....
Oh it's their business practice, open up a store in a small town and make it a net loss for 5 years till the businesses in town go bust. Common practice with bigger companies, if the CEO is smart he buys the building and gives himself a generous rental so he is making money even though the company is bleeding in that store.
most western countries have voter ids and dont mail millions of ballots out during elections. It at least has the air of not being a fix job.
BLM = RBP (Race Baiting Pays)
I want to be a doctor to help people. then I realize I would be a wage slave paying 120k a year on malpractice insurance and have close to a million in college loans if I went through with it. I said fuck it not doing this bullshit.
they dont need their votes, what good are they?
then play april 26 1992 by sublime.
There is an anti white crime being commited by asians though. If this dude doesn't get charged for a hate crime on top of everything else that'll be a joke.
What are you going on about, imagination, reasoning and creativity are part of philosophy. You can't separate the whole and act like they're different.
Here let me make simple to you. A philosopher knows that heating a pan of water will make the water eventually boil, the mathematician will ask you the dimension how many gallons of water you'll be heating and at what temperature and he'll tell you how long till the water boils, a scientist will tell you that once the water reaches 100 celsius the water will be boiling. Sure philosophy on it's own now days is a bit impractical I'll give you that much but it doesn't mean it's useless.
The wonderment and thought rumination in between problems. The pondering of a problem that needs solving and how to go on about it, it's all types of philosophizing. I know to you that is a dirty word but these acts are still just that. We are all philosophers and scientists, it doesn't mean we are good or capable ones but some people very much are.
Now days we may value more the scientific method than the abstractedness of philosophy. That's too bad because now people will lazily quote scientist instead of applying critical thought on issues. They'll quote scientific papers that agree with their views without as much as looking at sample and conditions or even if it's peer reviewed.
Now you say science is independent of philosophy yet the first 4 steps of the scientific method is philosophizing.
Make an observation. ... Ask a question. ... Propose a hypothesis. ... Make predictions. ...
Yep you're right Science is completely independent from it's ancient brother.