2
Prudentwait 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump won Florida, a swing state that voted less than 1% Republican in 2018, by over 3%. It's still a close state, but at least the elections are legitimate.

8
Prudentwait 8 points ago +9 / -1

Florida seems secure so long as DeSantis is in office. Re-elect Ron and primary Rubio while you still can!

1
Prudentwait 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're going to get yourself into trouble talking like that man. Think about what that implies. People should be sending their lives gaining personal influence and working on parallel institutions rather than throwing everything away for some fantasy war that will never come.

2
Prudentwait 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you think a civil war is the way forward you're an idiot and probably on the FBI's payroll. I'm not saying that people should vote for establishment Republicans. Fuck them. But to give up voting as a tool is just foolish. Run for office yourself. Elect friends and people you trust and know personally. I know people myself who have run for local office since 2016 to great success. Infiltrate institutions as the communists have done for years and prepare for a generational battle.

1
Prudentwait 1 point ago +2 / -1

Who cares? We can only control what we can control and there's no downside to voting if you genuinely believe a candidate deserves be elected. At the absolute worst, it will give establishment Republicans a hard time as they realize their constituents hate them beyond comprehension.

3
Prudentwait 3 points ago +3 / -0

A president is virtually powerless without jurisdiction over their own bureaucracy. I also love Trump, but his political naivety coupled with the fact that nobody in power supported him did his presidency in. This is a learning experience.

3
Prudentwait 3 points ago +4 / -1

Never give up man. This fight is hard and will probably get more and more disheartening over the next four years, but we can never surrender. What we're in for is greater than any one of us.

2
Prudentwait 2 points ago +2 / -0

They follow the same process. Maybe we could get a Governor or Senator under extraordinary circumstances, but I doubt a third party could win a national election.

2
Prudentwait 2 points ago +2 / -0

What makes you think this?

2
Prudentwait 2 points ago +2 / -0

The way our electoral system works, you have two parties, each supposedly representing one half of the country. The GOP base is rural, white, conservative, and loves Trump more than any President in history. Trump was able to win because he ran as one of the major parties. A third party could not win the electoral collage.

4
Prudentwait 4 points ago +4 / -0

He got hundreds of people out to stop the steal events, moved TPUSA to the right on immigration and social issues, and built up a movement that gets over 10,000 views every night despite being de-platformed three times. Beyond that, he is getting the right message out to young people who otherwise would have been politically disengaged or following the wrong people. Nick is on our side.

1
Prudentwait 1 point ago +2 / -1

americafirst.live !

Bookmark it.

4
Prudentwait 4 points ago +4 / -0

Behind the immature comedic moments and politically incorrect takes, Nick is a genuinely smart guy with keen political instincts. I don't know how anyone could watch his show from start to finish and come out with the impression that Nick is somehow unintelligent.

2
Prudentwait 2 points ago +2 / -0

America is a two party system and 90%+ of Republicans support President Trump. It's our only realistic option. Force the establishment to consolidate into the Democrat party.

1
Prudentwait 1 point ago +1 / -0

Patriotism = loyalty to one's government.

Nationalism = loyalty to one's nation.

Our nation will still exist, even if it lacks proper representation.

40
Prudentwait 40 points ago +40 / -0

Their idea of unifying the country is destroying all dissent. They want to unite us as slaves under their great reset.

7
Prudentwait 7 points ago +7 / -0

The military higher-ups want war and are committed to defending the globalist consensus at all costs. I don't know about Flynn, but we can't trust ANYONE within the establishment to take our side. Not the military, not the courts, not the politicians.

16
Prudentwait 16 points ago +16 / -0

One man alone could not take on an entire bureaucracy. I love President Trump, but there's no doubt he trusted people he shouldn't have and empowered the people who hate him when he didn't need to. This needs to be a learning experience.

1
Prudentwait 1 point ago +1 / -0

Infiltrate the GOP instead, Republican voters actually like Trump and America First.

4
Prudentwait 4 points ago +4 / -0

It isn't state vs state anymore, it's rural vs urban. A civil war/secession would look more like the collapse of Yugoslavia than 1860.

5
Prudentwait 5 points ago +5 / -0

The supporters who were willing to die for him might be spending the rest of their lives in jail, but at least Lil Wayne will be free!

2
Prudentwait 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not going to get incredibly specific here but everybody I know who works in the administration has said that pretty much everyone gave up the day after the election. Not Trump, but his cabinet including most of his advisors (Kushner especially) have been advising him to give up from the start. He surrounded himself with all the wrong people and this speech was probably written by one of them.

1
Prudentwait 1 point ago +1 / -0

Texas and Illinois were both horrifically rigged in 1960. Nixon was the last great man to hold office before Trump.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›