Don't use Twitter and Facebook.

And if you want to post a relevant message from either, crop it out as an image and leave out the parts that makes it identifiable as such. If necessary (for source) use Nitter.net.

It's just a message on the internet from a person that is publicly known.

Disincentivize people from using these websites. NOT posting their messages is preferable as well, so that they understand they shouldn't post their messages there either. Show messages on Gab.com instead.

Greetings

TL;DR: Refuse to pay taxes, overburden the system, force the government to come after you, win the narrative, demand fair elections.

I was made aware of this prophetic post and thought about a valid plan forward. Now for a while I thought 2A fueled revolution might be the solution, but I also heard someone suggesting that any revolt against the government would be shut down easily, even if tens of thousands or millions would participate, and that the 2A at best will serve as personal defence.

The ultimate spine breaking move would be to refuse to pay ANY taxes as long as the government is ruled by illegitimate individuals, which includes Beijing Biden and Heels-Up Harris. Use these terms (or other ones) in order to discredit them continually. Never give them the respect of calling them by their names or titles. Demand a proper reelection without election fraud, the removal of Dominion systems and the removal of all individuals who were involved in handling and counting the ballots this time.

The demand is not outrageous, and the threat is non-violent, yet devastating. The government will utilize everything they can against you and be brutal, including mass arrests, threats and doxing. Refuse and resist. Prefer peaceful resistance. You provoke your enemy to become violent.

Important is also to spread the idea properly and dominate the narrative. As of the USA, you have plenty of slogans that support this idea: "No taxation without representation" possibly being the strongest one. Make sure people know it's a Communist/Marxist coup that you fight.

The MSM will struggle to uphold a narrative in which a large chunk of the country is declared terrorist (which they plan to do anyway in the name of "white supremacy") where their threat is the refusal to pay taxes and the government comes for THEM rather than vice versa. Even leftists and moderates will start to think twice, and might even join you, seeing as the truth of the government unfolds right before their eyes. Make sure to teach them the lesson that government = violence.

The more people participate, the better. The less there are, the easier it can be stopped. Show the brutality of the government employed once it happens, but ensure that it is followed with the statement saying that the tyranny will only get worse unless it is stopped, and that they are growing desperate. Liberty without sacrifices is not possible. Support all businesses who refuse to pay taxes, and avoid those who do. Whoever runs your flag should get your full support. Call them loyalists and cowards. Call your movement patriots and the resistance. "Free America!" akin to "Free Hong Kong!" - Hell, put both of these on the same sign!

Create art that depicts communist tyranny, and art that depicts patriots fighting for liberty. Also pouring tee into the ocean (not too far fetched). Plaster the streets and internet with that. All you want is fair elections, nothing more, nothing less.

The bad reputation the government will take from all of it may have long lasting effects, which the political Aristocracy prefers to avoid. They want your tax money and they will cave in to your (reasonable) demands as to not harm the exploitative system which was established over centuries. Make sure to remember and highlight the names of the leaders who order violence against you, put pressure on politicians this way.

Do not fight for "justice." That's a step in the future.

I can tell you what is happening, and why "trust the plan" makes sense.

The world communists - to say so in simple terms - were pursuing their authoritarian and socialist leaning plans as usual, but then TRUMP stood in their way. This was not supposed to happen. Hillary was supposed to win. It was HER turn. It was supposed to be a smooth sailing in the coming years after Obama, a smooth decline towards which was supposed to provide enough time for people to adapt and accept.

But Trump DARED to win, and that made it quite difficult for them. He was not corruptible, and he was unpredictable. And they were right - he is a monster. They tried to rein him in, but he was renitent. As president, he started to do too good of a job - despite all the adversity, infiltration and treason he had to face. The odds were incredible difficult to handle, but he DID it anyway.

So they went on with the Russia collusion hoax, but it lacked the punching power. Ukraine impeachment was a very pathetic and obvious attempt, and unintentionally drew too much attention on Biden. They were forced to do that though to protect him and disarm Trump from being able to act against him without losing face, as he'd persecute an opposing political candidate. It was a neat trick and it worked.

Now it's 2020. Everything went too well. So they decided to release the virus in cooperation with their allies, the CCP, and along with it a plan to make the world go INSANE by releasing "secret leaked footage" of soldiers dropping dead on the floor. It was all propaganda, AND IT WORKED FLAWLESSLY. Almost all country leaders played along - either by stupidity, cowardice or being part of the plan. The Democrats played along - they ignored and downplayed the virus, and advocated to dance in China Town, right before they unanimously made a 180° turn and accused their enemies of what they were doing. They had to let the virus be spread after all, and they wanted it to spread as quickly as possible in the US. The other countries were largely just collateral damage, who cares, right?

The economy of the US, possibly the entire West was supposed to be shattered, Trump supposed to lose all support, as they believed the economy was his biggest strength. But he sailed the ship MASTERFULLY, a delayed spread, a quick economic decline and then a quick recovery. The damage was caused mostly in DEMOCRAT controlled states, so he didn't have control over that.

Desperation grows. Nothing worked so far, the prospects were that he'd be reelected, or at least they estimated his chances to be too high. So it's the crowbar. Decades of installing radical leftist agents with no moral standards into the election system have to be activated. Election fraud it is. BUT EVEN THAT FAILED! The support for Trump was enormous, way more than they expected. Maybe they had an estimation and the polls were meant to further shift it against Trump for demoralization purposes, but they were so far off because their estimations were false to begin with. The polls were pure fake btw, just whatever they wanted it to be. So they had to intervene "manually." So in that one mysterious night, they BLATANTLY gave Biden 140k votes. Pure, 100% Biden votes all at once.

This was the beginning of the end. They blew it. Failure after failure after failure. They could have saved their chances for 2024 and work to block Trump as much as possible. They could have kept their extensive election fraud system. But they knew Trump will be unleashed anyway and won't hold back any more. So they felt they HAD to try it.

More and more evidence of fraud emerges. It's over, and they know it. Now they are merely trying to save themselves from what is about to come - cover up the evidence, obstruct the investigation, frame the narrative (as usual), damage control. Well, that and they implicitly threaten Trump and the nation with the civil war they fostered for years over brainwashing their complicit audience and planting their seeds of division. They already allowed Antifa to terrorize the nation and have shown their willingness to enable political terrorism - for MONTHS. They had the privilege to be exempt from Covid too (believe the science btw!). "If you win, we will burn down the entire country. Give us power, or else."

Trump maneuvered himself BRILLIANTLY through all the odds, fighting on 20 fronts at once and still stacking numerous victories. Historic peace deals, opposing the establishment while having to utilize establishment figures, record economy, constitutional judges, the wall, starting no new wars and pursuing to end them, fighting human trafficking, etc.

This is why his supporters say "trust the plan." A man who handled EVERYTHING that was thrown at him will handle this challenge as well. Trump deserves all the faith, even if our access to information is limited. This is how the game is played, and they know that. Trump has done GOOD things continuously and overwhelmingly. There is no reason to doubt him, but all the reason to trust him.

Greetings

There is an idea that I would like to popularize, because in these times of information wars it might be quite useful.

The point is this: Fascism is publicly known to be bad and evil. Factually Communism (Marxist Socialism, a totalitarian clown world regime, which it ultimately is, and NOT the false utopia promised by "intellectual" idiots) is a magnitude worse than Fascism ever was. If anything, Communism is merely the type of Fascism that is publicly tolerated or even approved.

Why is Communism worse? Way higher death count, more cruelty, more economic destruction, more oppression, directed against the core population itself (killing a stranger is murder, but killing your own brother is murder + treason), in opposition to human nature itself (which "reeducation" is aiming at), highly expansionist (I guess this is weirdly disputed, but Communism is almost the same as what we identify as Globalism).

While both ideologies are indeed different in their details, their cores are almost identical: Collectivist, anti-Capitalist, anti-free speech, anti-property rights, mass murderous, expansionist, warmongering, intentionally oppressive.

The idea is this: If you think that Fascism is bad, then you should think that Communism is even worse. Because it is true. "Communism is Fascism on steroids" highlights that idea - and unless leftists start to endorse Fascism openly, it will tie them not only together with their little brethren, but also condemn both of these ideologies. Also you can name the beast by its proper name. Or they try to claim how different both ideologies are - then you can highlight the similarities. It will force them into defence mode and you into the offence.

I have used and continue to use this phrase, because it conveys a lot of striking thoughts in very few words. This is a way to weaponize language to our advantage. This is also something they do all the time, the difference being that we can say the truth and do not seek to deceive.

Your thoughts?

There is a common claim about BLM being infiltrated by Antifa and somehow turning originally peaceful protests into violent and destructive riots. It would imply that BLM is fundamentally different from Antifa. We know that Antifa is basically a violent communist organization (with neo-Marxism as its underlying ideology) and that they do not really oppose fascism at all, because communism is essentially fascism on steroids.

Here is the "what we believe" site from their website. Let's analyze - based on their own self-description - if they are truly so different from communists.

Our intention from the very beginning was to connect Black people from all over the world

Alright, we have a globalist element with emphasis on 3rd world interactions like mass immigration. It's also not uncommon for communists to utilize racial elements. The Soviet Union for example forced the migration of plenty of ethnics, which btw lead to many deaths and is considered as ethnic cleansing & terror, be it mass deportations or internal transfers. They were really obsessed with race & ethnicity and they forced the assimilation of their culture on everyone and everything, which was called Russification.

As such, it's usual that communist regimes and movements are deeply racially rooted. The idea that Marxism is inherently anti-racism is plain false - the opposite is true.

Every day, we recommit to healing ourselves and each other, and to co-creating alongside comrades, allies, and family a culture where each person feels seen, heard, and supported.

First of all, the nasty c-word is used. It's a big tell among politicians in Europe when they call each other comrades - they are always very far left at the very least. Nothing is ever socialist enough for them. It's a meme, but it's based on actual history. "Comrade" is a word that expresses collegiality and equality among soldiers, implying a war-time situation. Indeed a war exists, and it is a continuous one against Nationalist, Conservative and Libertarian values, even if they dominate the country already. The purge of your roots never ends until it is finished - by which they expect communism to be manifested as their Utopia. Be reminded - communism is their end-goal, they are called communists because they seek to achieve it - socialism is the intermediate (and practically final) system that pursues equity.

But we'll get to the neo-Marxist parts, we barely even scratched the surface.

state-sanctioned violence and anti-Black racism

Unsubstantiated claim, which is stated multiple times. But we already learned that they are emotionally driven and not empirically by this little statement from before:

Enraged by the death of Trayvon Martin

No reasonable person would write that and expect to be taken seriously intellectually. But they write this in order to appeal to rage and hatred, not to reason or positive and creative motivations.

won critical legislation to benefit Black lives

Aka furthered socialism, which was the very type of politics that degraded black culture so much (but it did so with all cultures anyway).

We are guided by the fact that all Black lives matter, regardless of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender identity, gender expression, economic status, ability, disability, religious beliefs or disbeliefs, immigration status, or location.

Here we finally enter the heavy communist territory. We got a huge list of collectives/identities, the typical gender bending stuff, atheism and of course illegal immigration support (aka 3rd world mass immigration). All the generic leftist points are expressed, and they do not even relate to blacks anyway - you could pull that up with any collective. Replace the first part of the sentence with women, nationalities, church groups, Dungeons and Dragons players... it is unrelated with each other.

We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence.

We foster a queer‐affirming network.

When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise)

And more buzzwords. We are about to hit critical mass. All of this panders to neo-Marxists. I'd be surprised if black people, even those who consider themselves to be members of BLM or allies, or just march and act under their banner, know about what they subscribe to.

We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from sexism, misogyny, and environments in which men are centered.

And we entered the domain of demonizing black men. Well, that was quick. Anyway, more buzzwords.

We practice empathy. We engage comrades with the intent to learn about and connect with their contexts.

The bad c-word again. And "intent to learn" = indoctrination into neo-Marxism. And "and connect with their contexts" = deprive them of their senses to perceive reality, and to live in a dream world of collectivist oppression Olympics where everything is about race, gender and identity. Where reason and logic are tools of the oppressors, and therefore do not matter. Only power matters to them.

We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.

Patriarchal practice? What? Patriarchal practice would be to have mothers being subservient to their husbands in terms of decision making - and at least being in a firm relationship. Black relationships are predominantly matriarchal, if anything. Especially given how they just talked about single mothers, highlighting it's a significantly large group to pander to.

And what is "justice work" supposed to mean? Do single black mothers somehow qualify as judges, lawyers or legislators? Or does it refer to putting your child into government funded daycare, so that the mother can go out and commit to activism? How would that ever make any sense?

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families

Ah yeah, the terrible nuclear family structure that seems to work out best for everybody - statistically and self-evidently. Let's just make everybody a degenerate by default. Unsurprisingly that's a good way to raise leftist voters, so this makes sense. Also: "extended families" = communes - alludes to communism.

We cultivate an intergenerational and communal network free from ageism

Did they forget about the whole black-people thing? This is just pure neo-Marxist pledge of allegiance now. Also: Intergenerational and communal network: Global work towards communism with emphasis on long-term effect, the subversion of Western Culture - aka government education system & media.

Let's jump back a little to this piece:

We are unapologetically Black in our positioning

The focus on race is highlighted. Now this sounds like a black supremacy movement. And what is a "black positioning" even? What if blacks disagree? Are they then not black? They will simply be considered race traitors, because the left holds monopoly over the definition of what is "black" or not. Imagine the same would be done for whites, or any race or ethnicity. Why is it acceptable for blacks to have their black supremacist movements filled with overt racist undertones?

Ah, because for one, the underlying ideology is neo-Marxism. So for one they are allies naturally with similar goals, and enjoy the support of all the leftist institutions, including the media. Also their shared, foundational belief is white supremacy, even if they claim to oppose it. But they do not realize that they are pointing at each other - it is them who consider minorities inferior. It is them who do not hold them to the ethical standards everybody holds each other accountable for. Meaning they promote black supremacy and welfare programs, as means of collective generosity - the powerful white hand that grabs the black hand and attempts to pull it up - why? Because it is morally superior as well - they ride the highest of all high horses.

So they do not need to apologize because the morally superior white leftists already forgave them - nay, they kneel down even. To them it's like playing along with your daughter's tea party with fantasy people. There is no limit to the degree they can submit and self-humiliate - because that's the magnitude of how much they consider themselves morally superior to everyone else.

If they'd consider blacks to be equals in the fight against the evil forces of sanity, they wouldn't even think about being subservient to each other. Why should they even? Don't they claim to be on the good side of history fighting bigotry and oppression? Shouldn't they be cheered as heroes instead?

To answer the question in the title:

Black Lives Matter has plenty of neo-Marxist elements to see clearly that they are indeed very communist leaning, and at least full-on socialist. They have a natural alliance with Antifa on an ideological level and also in many other ways - like the commitment to terror and violence, and the general disrespect of property. And they also have their social justice pledge of alliance with all the various buzzwords.

Antifa didn't just infiltrate a decent, innocent movement. They were allies all along. They just joined together for their common cause: The downfall of Western Civilization and the pursuit of socialism and power in all possible shapes and forms.

Somebody has asked this question (paraphrased) and I'd like to try to answer it:

I can tell you what it is. For the longest time we all are used to politicians being masters of delusion and honeyed words. The profound articulacy and academic grace - the most beautiful words and the smartest phrases - all a facade we are more than used to and bored by. Remember how articulate Obama was? In terms of competence he was terrible. But he sounded and acted nice.

That language of decency and pseudo-intellect is intended to fabricate the idea of smartness, moral superiority and gracefulness. But it stops at that - it's just an illusion. It always has been and was the standard. It's nothing but shrouded arrogance and vanity.

Then came along Trump like an alpha, didn't play the career politician route of honeyed words and just threw his dick on the table: The famous billionaire and entertainment-real estate mogul - his accomplishments alone proved his competence in leadership, business and negotiation to be among the best of the best.

He didn't fake to be smart, he didn't spoke in a way which passively alludes to his smartness - he rather outright clarified it, he bragged about it. He spoke like an actual real human being with an actual real, fallible personality. He made himself attackable, because he didn't put a made up role into the game, but himself.

People recognized his authenticity in this regard, and it is basically unknown since ever (or at least decades). It's a breeze of fresh air, that level of honesty and bluntness. Not necessarily what he says - he likes to joke, brag and exaggerate, which are technically not true (and some idiots fact check him on that) - but doing so is an expression of his real personality. The shortcomings of his character is what makes him real and human, and therefore appealing to the public.

Fake personality roles of career politicians are infallible. Everything is prepared, the interviews, the debates, the questions, the answers. The media ensures to frame everything nicely and keep the game going. This is why Obama appeared so "perfect" all the time. It was all theater, and it had plenty of crews ensuring it worked. Trump is just a single man who says whatever the fuck he wants however the fuck he wants.

The reason the Democrats reacted as they do is because they realized that Trump is a rule-breaker. That pact of soft disagreements was threatened to break. Every politician before him played by the same rules - Republicans and Democrats as well - disagree on banalities, but stay in line with the deep state agendas. Obviously Republicans still drew the shorter straw, given that the media is dominated by (neo-)Marxists who want their progress - which is btw going on for more than half a century. McCarthy back then was right - there was communist infiltration going on and it was more than successful.

And Trump is a billionaire who is basically immune to bribery. That's not a real politician. That's not someone that can be controlled. All of these things combined, his affinity to Libertarian policies and his severe opposition to the Communists' agendas made him the #1 enemy of the state - and as such the champion of Western Civilization itself.

Thoughts?