I see nothing wrong with tattooing barcodes on our forearms. We've conveniently erased history and tore down all statues, so I have no reason to be dubious of the suggestions of Mr. Yang. Now which cattle car am I supposed to board for the vaccination?
Yes, this data reads an average of 4.8 swabs per pool and 10 pools with positive samples, which could mean 1+ per pool (could calculate the range but not enough info). Either way, this is potentially 10 - 50 false positives, not 9000 because you have 1927 pools with negative results from onset (1927 pools x 4.8 people per pool = 9250 negative tests). While I agree with the implication (testing lacks sensitivity and asymptomatic people do not have or spread covid), this data is not presented accurately.
Your statement is very accurate, and confirmation bias is pervasive in modern research of all fields including, biological sciences, social sciences, climate science, etc.
What academia has implemented due to government and outside funding is designing studies with the intent to prove the hypothesis instead of trying to disprove the hypothesis. That is, they setup studies in order to help them succeed. Honest researchers applying the scientific method appropriately design their studies trying to make the hypothesis fail. The reason being, you only have to disprove something once for it to be untrue. For instance, if someone makes the statement all swans are white, they can count as many white swans as they want, millions even, it doesn't matter. However, they only need to find 1 black swan to demonstrate that the statement "all swans are white" is false.
Sweden is our black swan which is why they don't want to talk about it.
Researchers try to explain this away by using terms like "paradox". Essentially, we cannot reject our hypothesis because our funding will get cut so this is some unexplainable outlier event that has some other reason for existing that is not yet accurately defined, but if we did define it, then it would conform to our hypothesis...so we'll just ignore it for now. If you're familiar with cholesterol, you've probably heard of the French paradox; which is that high cholesterol causes heart disease, except in France, where it doesn't. This statement is also easily disproven by observing instances in which heart disease is present in people with low cholesterol levels, which happens frequently. Therefore, I cannot make the statement high cholesterol is the cause of heart disease otherwise people with low cholesterol would never develop CVD. Although that doesn't stop us from doing so because we have a drug that can inhibit the production of cholesterol in the body, and we can prescribe it to everyone for the majority of their life....Not to be taken out of context as I don't want to get into the nuances of the pathophysiology of CVD, put simply, high cholesterol is a data point to consider in a clinical evaluation, and not an automatic manifestation of disease that requires treatment. The point is I cannot say it is the "cause" of heart disease as there are too many observable black swans to the contrary. Just like I cannot say lockdowns and masks prevent excess mortality from COVID, as I can look at Sweden and observe an outcome similar if not better than our own without utilizing those measures.
The blame for a career criminal getting arrested in the process of committing a crime by police officers in a liberal city using approved policing techniques, while ingesting a lethal dose of fentanyl in order to evade additional criminal culpability lies solely at the feet of the Target Corporation which must be looted and punished. Open and shut case.
Who knew Hussein was dragged across the finish line by Joe's charisma and unblemished character. People only vote for a black guy when you have a sharp white intellectual like Biden on the ticket. The question becomes, could Obama actually been president if he didn't pick the most popular VP of all time? Probably not, wasn't strong enough on his own.
So we have a vaccine that's 90% effective for people with a 99.9% survival rate (majority of population)?
0.1% x 90% = 0.09%
Absolute risk change of 99.9% to 99.91% for majority of population? How are they managing so well in China without a vaccine...I wonder.
Can't wait to get the data to calculate the number needed to treat, and the number needed to harm...
This could lead to the first transition delay in modern history, except in 2000, when the Supreme Court decided a recount dispute between Al Gore and George W. Bush in December.
It's the first time other then that other time it happened first...lol these fucking guys.
Idle thoughts on my part, but does anyone wonder what Space Force does? Satellites in space...what can we use that for? What if domestic terrorists are funded by foreign entities? When Trump tweeted that foreign countries would print millions of ballots, was this a "guess" ? Could foreign countries print ballots domestically? What if he didn't mean the word "print" literally? Are our intelligence agencies compromised by foreign blackmail, or at least the people pulling their strings?
What makes Qanon dangerous is it requires people to ask questions and think for themselves. Use logic, facts, and evidence...then decide. People are programmed by MSM, Schools, and Hollywood of what to think, and not how to think. If people learn how to think on their own again, they become very dangerous, because they start asking problematic questions of the people in power.
How would they know? If this is a new strain, then they would need a new test. This is just confirming that the current test is bullshit and non-specific to COVID-19 and instead, due to PCR, cycles until it finds some fragment of Corona DNA in your sample.