2
RPD2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I personally checked the data on this one myself.

There are over 90,000 centenarians in the US, so people born around 1920 may have voted. I checked 30 people that were born before 1905 and although they were all registered, none of them had apparently voted (which you can tell as it says "Your clerk has not recorded receiving your AV Application", unlike the people who have voted where it instead says "Application received").

I did see someone here link to a person who was born in 1902 and voted, and I verified that, but these cases are probably very rare from my investigation.

So yep most likely a nothing burger.

25
RPD2 25 points ago +25 / -0

I personally think we should put together a reimbursement fund for those that paid large money to help save the republic.

<pokemon voice>And make it double.</voice>

4
RPD2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yay, new stickies!

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

So is Benford's Law completely off now for any state?

What do you personally think are the most promising stories so far that you've found when it comes to election fraud?

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you considered simply checking the number of votes where they were switched from Biden to Trump instead of vice versa? You should see that as a common occurrence too.

8
RPD2 8 points ago +8 / -0

I had high hopes, but it's not.

See here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1Biw1NYqZi

Basically, it looks like it's boiling down to rounding errors (3 digits of precision is not enough!). The OP of that post didn't check to see the other way around, if Biden votes were being switched to Trump (spoiler it appears that they are due to the aforementioned crappy 3dp precision).

In summary, I have much higher hopes for the stuff that Trump and his team are working on.

2
RPD2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Btw I've heard of rounding errors being used deliberately to cheat before (in finance if not in politics). Do you think there were unusually more/higher vote switch amounts going from Trump to Biden than vice versa, that couldn't just be explained by chance alone?

8
RPD2 8 points ago +8 / -0

As a computer programmer who loves stats, as soon as I read the post, my heart sunk because he didn't check to see if the reverse happened to check for data integrity. Sure enough, in the comments, I hear someone (you) state as such. Thank you a ton for checking this out. We need to highlight real fraud that's probably going on instead of focusing on stuff like this.

64
RPD2 64 points ago +64 / -0

Lol, this would never fly if we were still on Reddit.

5
RPD2 5 points ago +5 / -0

No more postal voting (except maybe for the military?). AFAIK, you can't do exit polls that way?

4
RPD2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Twitter link already down :( Hope someone grabbed it.

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh right. Same sort of demographics though.

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, it would be Detroit. So many third worlders in charge who loves to cheat, just like they did with Jussie smollett or whatever his name was.

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then, Biden / Kamala president will give citizenship to 22 millions of illegal aliens.

Don't they need the house and senate to do that?

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems really fishy, but might they claim that the 19,958 was added to Trump's count by accident, and that they should have added it on to Biden's count?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›