Nice Catch!!!! Well done shadow ban warrior!!!
When you realize you are not actually watching black mirror, you are living it.
Immunity in exchange for testimony.
they will redact anything particularly juicy saying it is privileged. opposing counsel will likely draw this out by redacting important sections and the good guys will have multiple fights to remove those redactions. Hope for the best, plan for the worst.
Their motion will definitely be denied. I doubt the Court provides any reasoning when denying it but standing would be quick and easy.
Michigan also has a better fact that the state can’t explain why 175,000 absentee ballots out of Wayne County do not tie to a registered voter. The brief buried that lead.
Michigan can't explain why 175,000 absentee ballots out of Wayne County do not tie to a registered voter. The brief buried that lead. (pg. 6)
Whole numbers...huh...who knew that is how votes could be counted?
See comment at end of article: "While Shafer says the Secretary of State’s office is now in agreement on the issue of votes being counted illegally, National File was unable to locate a public comment made by Raffensperger to this effect."
That one supports the election official's statement from earlier today. Thanks for link!
This. Great work, trueluk!!
This is powerful. The old suitcases of ballots trick. Nice try!!!
It starts around 1:23 PM ET You can see the time stamp in the lower left hand corner of the video
Security Camera footage confirming statements in witnesses' affidavits.
Shouldn't you remove 1% of total (33852) from Biden (1,672,143 - 33852 = 1638291). Then add 1% to Trump (for the one blank vote) and add another 1% (for the transferred vote). So results would be:
Joe Biden (D): 1,638,291, 47.9% Donald Trump (R): 1,729,390, 50.6% Jo Jorgensen (LB): 51,465, 1.5%
“A river cuts through rock, not because of its power, but because of its persistence.” —James N. Watkins
I believe it is around 1:42:00 mark.
THANK YOU!
How will these Republicans learn the hard way?? It doesn't matter how Republicans vote if future elections can continue to be fraudulently conducted. This issue cuts to the fundamental core of our republic. If we cannot reliably elect our leaders due to accepted fraud, then what do we really have?
There appears to be many ways around this trade secret protection so that the evidence can still be admitted without revealing the trade secret. See below (note, I believe this is the current trade secrets act but I'm not 100%):
Georgia Trade Secrets Act of 1990 § 10-1-765. Protection of trade secret during action.
In an action under this article, a court shall preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret by reasonable means, which may include granting protective orders in connection with discovery proceedings, holding in camera hearings, sealing the records of the action, and ordering any person involved in the litigation not to disclose an alleged trade secret without prior court approval.
Amen.