One hour ago Trump retweeted a link with our affidavit. :))
Reading the commentaries I had another idea: when we have all the data we should have look at the average speed of workers too. The machines have a physical limit but people also have a limit. Especially when they are governmental workers and they are used to take their time for everything. If hundreds of thousands of ballots arrived at 4 AM, there is much less time for a human to verify the envelopes.
Below, from another affidavit (min 1:05): "the same batches being run through the tabulator 8 to 10 times"..
This page says between 150 to 300 pages per minute. At 100 ppm there are 6000 per hour under Ideal conditions, as you said. I don't think the precincts have hundreds of those.
To make a map where any anomaly could show up, we need the the total number of machines per precinct, the model used, and when they started the counting. Also, the precise time when they received ballots, when they published the results (like the link below, the scrapper of NY Times, but for each precinct in the state). It would be great if we have this data as much as detailed as possible.
This part (I transcribed it with OCR from the affidavit of Russell James Ramsland, Jr., of Allied Security Operations Group):
- The final red flag is perhaps the greatest Something occurred in Michigan that is physically impossible, indicating the results were manipulated on election night within the EMS. The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733 13. The final red flag is perhaps the greatest Something occurred in Michigan that is physically impossible, indicating the results were manipulated on election night within the EMS. The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hour and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the equipment available at the 4 reference locations (precincts/townships) we looked at for processing ballots, and cross referencing that with both the time it took at each location and the performance specifications we obtained using the serial numbers of the scanning devices used. (Model DRM16011 - 60/min. without accounting for paper jams, replacement cover sheets or loading time, so we assume 2,000 ballots/hr. in field conditions which is probably generous). This calculation yields a sum of 94,867 ballots as the maximum number of ballots that could be processed. And while it should be noted that in the event of a jam and the counter is not reset, the ballots can be run through again and effectively duplicated, this would not alleviate the impossibility of this event because duplicated ballots still require processing time. The existence of the spike is strongly indicative of a manual adjustment either by the operator of the system (see paragraph 12 above) or an attack by outside actors. In any event, there were 289,866 more ballots processed in the time available for processing In four precincts/townships, than there was capacity. A look at the graph below makes clear the This is not surprising because the system is highly vulnerable to a manual change in the ballot totals as observed here.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gand.283580.7.1_2.pdf
You could find the machines used in the process and the protocol here:
https://verifiedvoting.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/mageCast%C2%AE-Central-User-Guide-Colorado.pdf
“To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.”
John Adams and Thomas Paine talking about "The American Crisis" (1776).