1
Raetchel 1 point ago +1 / -0

clearly she like sex with Satan... isn't it obvious OP?

1
Raetchel 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the podium is coated in COVID infected snot or the chairs at the ACB event, then things fall into place.

282
Raetchel 282 points ago +284 / -2

They are here already. You can recognize them by the (D) they carry after their names.

They also tend to put Biden signs on their cars and lawns.

The clever owns try to hide it with a fancy “coexist” bumper sticker.

They also burn cities down under the banner of Antifa or this Marxist cult called BLM.

Easy to spot. Destroy on sight.

2
Raetchel 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought we were talking about the Presidential...

My bad.

1
Raetchel 1 point ago +1 / -0

In another reply I clarify... REPUBLICAN NOMINEE

If you don't know there are two sets of rules in America, I don't know where you've been.

And, not to defend her, because I think she is unqualified to be dog catcher, but she did clerk for Justices. Justices do not write their own opinions, so some of Marshall's decisions were written by her. And that could be considered "direct judicial experience."

2
Raetchel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope.

In fact, most will see it as an act of compassion.

0
Raetchel 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think you will find that third person in the line is any but an American Patriot.

3
Raetchel 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn't say you must be a lawyer. I said you're not going to pass the confirmation hearing in the Senate unless you have judicial experience.

1
Raetchel 1 point ago +1 / -0

came here for this

9
Raetchel 9 points ago +9 / -0

True.

But one must be confirmed by the Senate. What likelihood does one have of being confirmed to the SCOTUS without direct judicial experience?

It's naive to think a person could get through confirmation without experience, especially if nominated by a Republican.

Just won't happen.

35
Raetchel 35 points ago +35 / -0

I love Tom and wish he'd make an account here...

You do realize that Tom is the President of Judicial Watch, but... isn't a lawyer himself, right?

2
Raetchel 2 points ago +3 / -1

I can’t stand Q. Check my history.

But this is horseshit.

I’ve been following Q from the beginning, if for no other reason than to know what Q is spreading.

The House should be thanking Q for existing and spreading it’s message of pacification because if it wasn’t for Q, many conservatives would be taking up arms right now. Instead these guys are waiting on nonexistent white hats that are “protecting America”...

Never have I read anything from Q calling anyone to arms, condoning racism, xenophobia, fascism, or any other boogeyman one can imagine.

To condemn Q is to request a war.

The most fucked up part is that Marxism is rife in America. This shit is being forced upon our children in all aspects of their lives; whether education, social media, or in the workplace.

Yet there is no HR resolution condemning that shit.

So... I will no longer deport Qubes from TDW.

Q is welcome now imo.

1
Raetchel 1 point ago +1 / -0

I prefer eliminating to left once and for all.

by geewiz
3
Raetchel 3 points ago +3 / -0

Might be true... but know that Nelson was a fucking Marxist.

1
Raetchel 1 point ago +1 / -0

He knew it because he participated in it. You sort of make it sound like these facts are separate actions... it was all one big conspiracy, collusion.

2
Raetchel 2 points ago +2 / -0

You must not understand me. Durham is a cuck of immense magnitude. I just want him to prove me wrong. That will be a great day. The day he hurries up and releases the indictments.

I honestly do not believe he will ever indict or recommend indictments. He will release a report and pass it to Barr... who again I believe will say there is no actionable information.

But I pray... I pray every day... that I a wrong.

2
Raetchel 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are a lot of cucks out there saying "she's only hot because of make-up."

Make-up is important, but make-up must be applied to a canvass. If the canvass is shit (see Rosie or any leftist woman really) then the results are, "what the fuck is this monstrosity?"

My wife is hot without make-up, say a 7.. 7.5. Girl next door sort of beauty. When she puts on make-up, she is easily a 10. I personally rate her higher, but beyond 10 is subjective to a man's personal tastes.

Hope has a great foundation and if you don't see that, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about (probably because you like men). ))

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›