Wife called me to tell me she cancelled Disney+ seconds before I saw this.
I swear, you Pedes are wizards. Perfect timing you beautiful autists.
Fuck the anti American scum known as GayFL and all the retards who are still watching that garbage.
This is the ONLY post about the GayFL that should be allowed on this website.
All of you retards still watching the NFL are a bunch of faggots. Get your mind out of the gutter and stop supporting those who want to destroy you.
I literally didn’t even know there was a game until the faggots and cucks on this board started going crazy over it.
You should be ashamed you watch the NFL. Everyone on this website who still watches that Marxist garbage should be deeply ashamed of it. Buncha fucking retards is wha you are. This should be something you do in private, something you don’t tell the world about.
You are embarrassing yourself bruh. Stop.
That’s a long and convoluted way for you to justify why you are still watching the GayFL.
You can rationalize all day long. At the end of the day the NFL has your attention and interest. And come on dude, don’t compare the NFL to academia.
We lose absolutely nothing if we simply let football die a natural death. We don’t have to rescue it. Collectivist fanaticism is not a rational value, there’s no reason to work to gain or keep it. If anything society might be better off playing better, manlier sports.
Academia is actually an important institution that we should try to get back.
In any case, you don’t rescue academia by torrenting lectures by Marxist professors and claiming you aren’t part of the problem because you didn’t pay for them.
Quit being a leech, pay for what you watch and stop trying to make excuses for watching unAmerican faggotry.
All organized sport fanaticism is gay AF, brutish and lame, but football is particularly faggy.
The game used to be somewhat respectable, but the rules have changed and players are too coddled and protected now.
The fact that NFL faggots get paid millions to do a quarter of the work the average rugby player does without any protection other than a cup should be telling.
Add on top of all that faggotry the fact that the NFL is now completely out of the closet when it comes to its anti-Americanism and you’ve run completely out of excuses.
Stop watching the faggotry. Stop engaging in collectivist fanaticism. If you absolutely must at least watch a real sport, not faggy football.
The NFL should have died when that Marxist douche started kneeling for the national anthem. The fact that they still exist is a national disgrace. You are part of the reason they still exist, think about that one for a while.
Found the faggot that is still watching the GayFL.
I bet you also pay for Amazon Prime,
Unamerican piece of shit lol
That guy is a lunatic, a faggot and a rabid anti-Trumper.
Look it up.
I haven’t had any problems whatsoever with these.
I use my Peltors 5-6 times a week, sometimes 4-6 hours a day. My only complaint is the fact that I have to buy and replace AA batteries often. I think most people won’t use them as much as I do, so they won’t have to replace them as often as I do.
But these have held strong for a couple years now. I’ve had a ton of electronic Walker headsets that went bad less than a year in. I also know from a bunch of my fellow instructors that Walkers tend to go bad. They are way cheaper than Peltors but the Peltors are nicer.
I strongly recommend the Peltors if you have the money and you shoot often enough to justify the $120-200 price tag.
I can’t find any kind of confirmation for this.
I certainly believe it is true, don’t get me wrong, but I’d like to find an article by a credible source so I can send it to my commie brother and show him.
Lin Wood is a lunatic, a fraudster and a faggot.
Good stuff. Can someone please explain the commie handshake thing again?
I’ve seen it a couple times but I don’t really know what it means..
I read the Gulag Archipelago and it was brutal.
I like to think my wife’s family adopted an America-loving immigrant patriot. They come to me for guns and in return they make and buy me the coolest merica gifts!
This is crazy. They are coming for political opponents now. This is wild...
Good and bad are not relative dude.
I’m surprised you are going that route. Usually Christians don’t deny the objectivity of such terms.
You guys need to get your story straight. Some of you are saying the dark ages were not bad some of you were saying they were. Some of you are saying they do in fact represent the time when Christianity ruled and some of you are saying the opposite.
The problem of the dark ages had nothing to do with lack of resources.
Even shorter:
The source of rights is the law of identity: A is A.
Man is man. He has a certain nature and his nature requires freedom in a social context. Anything short of that is subhuman and it’s just a matter of degree at that point.
The debt owed to the founders is monumental but they did make the mistake of positing that the source of rights was a “creator”.
To be fair many of them (including Jefferson) openly rejected the mystical metaphysical claims made by Christianity. They didn’t believe the “creator” was a god like the one you believe in. They often referred to it as “nature’s god” which is how the enlightenment era thinkers sought to decouple science (including political science) from mysticism and avoid literally getting killed for blasphemy in the process.
In short:
- No, the founders didn’t really see “creator” the same way you do.
- They were explicit adherents to the natural rights philosophy, which is secular and a byproduct of the enlightenment, not Christianity
- In any case, rights cannot and do not come from supernatural entities and that does not make them any more objective than replacing god with the state, the community, the nation etc.
Well that was later, after they realized there were a ton of resources to conquer and a lot of children to rape.
But before that was known they were explicitly against it.
To say that the source of rights is supernatural and that one needs to rely on faith to see that is one of the main reasons why conservatives have lost moral and political ground for decades.
That’s not a proper defense of the concept of individual rights. On the contrary. That’s a complete capitulation and surrender to the statists. To say rights are real and important but that you cannot really validate their source with evidence or reason is to openly admit side is wrong.
The source of rights, according to you, can be summarized with “trust the plan”.
I can answer that question.
Read this and educate yourself.
A “right” is a moral principle defining and sanctioning a man’s freedom of action in a social context. There is only one fundamental right (all the others are its consequences or corollaries): a man’s right to his own life. Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action; the right to life means the right to engage in self-sustaining and self-generated action—which means: the freedom to take all the actions required by the nature of a rational being for the support, the furtherance, the fulfillment and the enjoyment of his own life. (Such is the meaning of the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.)
The concept of a “right” pertains only to action—specifically, to freedom of action. It means freedom from physical compulsion, coercion or interference by other men.
Thus, for every individual, a right is the moral sanction of a positive—of his freedom to act on his own judgment, for his own goals, by his own voluntary, uncoerced choice. As to his neighbors, his rights impose no obligations on them except of a negative kind: to abstain from violating his rights.
The right to life is the source of all rights—and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave.
Bear in mind that the right to property is a right to action, like all the others: it is not the right to an object, but to the action and the consequences of producing or earning that object. It is not a guarantee that a man will earn any property, but only a guarantee that he will own it if he earns it. It is the right to gain, to keep, to use and to dispose of material values.
And yes, once Christianity/mysticism began to be rejected things got better.
The point is, and so far none of you have disputed it, that when Christianity ruled life was short, miserable and brutish for most people. Your buddy even admitted that yes, when Christianity ruled we called that period the dark ages.
You are not trying to refute that. You are merely trying to convince me that:
- The dark ages weren’t that bad and
- They didn’t last forever and things eventually got better.
You are dead wrong about 1 and I guess too dumb to realize 2 basically proves Christian ethics do in fact make life on earth worse.
Gayest shit I’ve ever read.