Their basic argument doesn't even make sense, "Can't happen because thousands would have to be involved and that many people can't keep a secret." Well they didn't keep it a secret, in fact they were caught, thousands of times. Or are they now asserting that thousands of people couldn't conspire to cheat, but thousands of people could conspire to pretend they did? You already pointed out the veritas stuff, where they didn't have to trick anyone to find election fraud, the criminals were openly posting what they were doing to social media.
Basically, you won't win because this is emotional for them. Evidence causes them mental anguish, and makes them upset with you for causing them this pain. The only way out is for them to convince themselves, I haven't found a way to confront them about reality that ends well.
Oh, they have another poll they want us to look at? lol
They've so consistently fucked up with partisan polling you can take whatever they come up with, shift it 10% in Trump's favor, and this will reliably be closer to reality. So there's your answer, 64% don't care or want him to keep his foot on the gas.
Until this moment I was 100% convinced that was someone acting like a tard for their livestream.
What's even the point, we've had closed captions for half a century.
That Veritas drop with the twitter indian explaining his hamfisted moral censorship really drove this home. Call your congressmen and ask them why we're permitting H1B foreigners in any position to dictate what speech we're allowed to express.
I have this recurring dream where we recommission the Springfield Armory to stockpile firearms, then when something like this happens, where a citizen in a western country is abused by their own government for daring to prefer themselves, we overtly smuggle tens of thousands of rifles to nationalists and let the chips fall where they may.
The fascinating African history gets suppressed by those who benefit from viewing black people like disney characters rather than the way we view everyone else.
These Brendan Fraser shops are going too far.
Objectively verifiable numbers and actions are feelings and imaginations? You are not equipped for this conversation.
You're free to actually point them out whenever you'd like. I provided examples that directly address the gaps and flaws in your logic. Rather than give a rational explanation why each of your statements is contracted by reality, you're just telling me I'm wrong.
Not at all. Whether Fields defended himself or intentionally tried to hurt people is an honest question. The conclusion I require is that Fields was railroaded, because it's plainly obvious. When the judge directs who your lawyer will be and you get nine years for hit and run, or five seventy year sentences for hitting someone, there isn't much room to pretend otherwise.
Also, there are far too many recent examples of people being given wildly out of line sentences (Stone), and judges/juries doing everything in their power to convict the innocent (Flynn), to pretend our system is above it. Shit's fucked bruv.
Two blocks away, where he came from, there are videos of communists breaking windows out of cars and attacking the drivers. There is a twitter post from a communist professor thanking Spikes Tactical for his rifle, that he claims in the post he used to threaten James Fields and chase him towards that crowd. The entire day had hundreds of videos showing extreme violence up to and including makeshift flamethrowers being used. There is video evidence of damage to his vehicle before he hit anyone. There is video evidence of him swerving around people and hitting the brakes at various times, which isn't what you do if you want to strike those people. I don't know what was in Field's heart, but I do know that there's plenty of exculpatory evidence and it's clear that he got absolutely railroaded.
This SUV had a thousand feet too at some point; they weren't threatened, until they were. Is it ok to ask why they didn't just turn around and avoid this? No, it's immoral to ask victims why they didn't do something else to avoid a situation. I'll afford Fields the same leeway any other victim gets; no expectation of perfection or anything close to it. If the mob doesn't want to get plowed over, they should avoid being violent.
It probably was. Aggressively pushing into someone is assault/battery, and using force to stop it is justified in any jurisdiction I'm aware of. She is using unlawful force against him in furtherance of a crime, as part of a criminal organization. Why are people ignoring that part?
Side Chick Harris is going to be a disaster.
Who are these people who don't put even the slightest amount of thought in before they make an argument? Ok dude, lets see you swim across a river with a 40 foot ladder. Lets see you quickly and quietly drag it to the wall. Lets see you scale it, drop off the other side without shattering your ankles, and getting away before USBP Agents can react. Except they already knew you were there ten minutes ago because your stupid enormous ladder set off every sensor in the zone and laughing camera operators told them some retard with a giant ladder was struggling their way into the country.
They're so fundamentally incapable of critical thought, I'm shocked they aren't saying illegals will just use an escalator.
I work in a blue city because that's where I have to be to do border security stuff. Standing by to burn in my sleep.