1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed, we’re going to make trillions of fake votes for trump.

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

The msm is the PR arm of the democrat party. There’s no such thing as the MSM rejecting the dem leadership unless they’re actively wanting to replace him.

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if he had a covid shot recently. That GB syndrome is starting to look like a common side effect of the “vaccines”

2
RandomPanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Potato of the United States

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s an amendment to chapter 13. Basically removes the ability to draw military forces from US territories for combating insurrection. Also changes it to something like military forces instead of “land and sea forces”

11
RandomPanda 11 points ago +11 / -0

I choked on my food when I got to this part...

“ The world’s largest online retailer said that a mail election raised the risk of fraud and the coercion of workers. It also said the process would depress turnout, arguing that as many as 29% of its more than 5,800 employees eligible to vote wouldn’t do so or would return incorrectly completed ballots.”

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll tell you the lynch pin of the entire covid scam and thus the election fraud. If someone can figure out who was behind this, you will find the first solid thread of the conspiracy. The Lancet journal publishing the fake study about HCQ being unsafe. To get a study into the Lancet, it has to be solid and peer reviewed. A doctor was quoted saying that to have the Lancet retract a study is a once in a several generation event. This study was fabricated and bypassed the usual reviews to then be used as a way to shutdown any and all talk of treating covid with hcq. Without this, the plandemic would have ended by April of last year. No economic collapse, no vote by mail, no opportunity for insane vote fraud. The key is the Lancet journal and who authorized this study to be published.

3
RandomPanda 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not sure if biden alone can rename them considering the term is used (defined?) in the constitution.

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q posts quoting Trump occurred before trump’s posts. There were some other proofs as well which required Trumps complicity. Ether Trump was involved or he would have had to stay on script for his tweets and live press conferences etc and his speech/tweet writer was involved with Q. And I don’t think trump sticks to scripts or let anyone else tweet for him

2
RandomPanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like these posts where some claims to know who/what Q is that clearly don’t even understand the evidence provided. You really think people would buy into it with basic stuff like leaks? How about instead of hitting that post button, you actually look into it before literally proving you know nothing one sentence in.

2
RandomPanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like Legal Eagle is inciting violence to me.

3
RandomPanda 3 points ago +3 / -0

The trick is to say “in Minecraft” at the end of every post. That’s like calling a timeout when playing tag or when a K-9 unit is chasing you.

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except Twitter can block accounts. A good lawyer could argue that the previous ruling set a precedent that US citizens must be allowed to interact with potus so Twitter cannot ban ANY US account.

3
RandomPanda 3 points ago +3 / -0

You sound an awful lot like a democrat with talk of censoring ideas you don’t like.

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please tell me more about the effectiveness of American votes

1
RandomPanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jfc. A trump bro bought it to point to Joe Biden.com and then pointed it at the White House.

5
RandomPanda 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interesting. Could be why he hasn’t pardoned Assange and Snowden. Can’t have it look like quid pro quo.

view more: Next ›