1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

With any tech progress, it always comes down to WHO owns the tech and what do they want to advance it for. In this case, I believe Musk wants to advance it for the reasons he has given. The fact that so many leftist entities have teamed up to destroy Elon, and Twitter, it shows me AGAIN AND AGAIN that every time they team up to destroy something, that something is in some way a negative towards the leftists end goals.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

The real question is, can a girl have an onlyfans and still have a future husband? Isabella does not think so, which leads to the next question...

How the heck is she single?

32
RationalThought 32 points ago +32 / -0

You should have stuck with your original reply. It is easy to blow off someone saying something negative about you, but when multiple, non connected people say the exact same thing, it is much harder to ignore.

3
RationalThought 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you have ever met a klepto, this makes sense. It doesn't matter that he can afford it, what matters is he has to scratch this itch. It makes me wonder what else he has stolen from being in such a high position.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

"a fake @cnn story"

What is he trying to say?

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very diverse drawing, wouldn't want the kids to see white people in those hands.

2
RationalThought 2 points ago +2 / -0

"And convinced my adopted son to do the same"

5
RationalThought 5 points ago +5 / -0

She needs to wear a condom too for it to work.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never stopped counting, just called it a different name.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

Musk - "I will bring free speech to twitter"

A few very vocal people here -" He has owned twitter for one month, he did not unban Alex Jones. This proves he is in no way an ally to conservatives. You cannot change my mind, and I refuse to look at anything he is doing".

by Tesic
1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

So conservative Joe six pack should feel obligated to get enough donors to cover the "at least have $4,000 willing to donate using Dem Dollars, to qualify as a recipient of this program, for those running for office", to run for local election.

The thing I see is that Joe conservative does not have the capitol to run for local office but now can possibly get many "sick of dems" people to donate their fake dollars in lieu of donating their real money, which turns into real money for the one running for office, as long as they qualify.

Yes, I know it is a democrat grift scheme but that does not mean you can't TRY to use it for our own benefit, for maybe someone broke that really wants to run in Oakland.

2
RationalThought 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where the heck are all these soldiers that are armed and so far away from their unit that someone could walk up on them, shoot a gun, and walk away with their rifle?

2
RationalThought 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember Obama and his trillion dollar coins?

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hate this MF. It is so insane to me, that we send him billions and all these weapons with zero oversight. What a joke.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well pede, this should not give you reason to promote us hating on Musk because of your ban. You do not know how many people your voice can reach online, and I think we should be encouraging what Musk is doing against the left, not fighting against it. If he says he will unban everyone, I tend to believe that he will do just that. Though he was left it open about if the ban was justified for legal reasons, and of course his own bias. I do not think Elon is anywhere near our levels of red, but he is still a force that is actively pushing in our direction if he knows it or not. I feel that we should support him, or anyone that is fighting for one of our core tenants.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

So all of them. When I go to BreitBart or TGP and see their advertisers, it is pretty sad. It might be different here as twitter gets hundreds of millions of views a day, but I still feel like companies now do not care about lost revenue. From movies to commercial products, it just seems that the Gov will give them money if they run in the red, as long as they push the narrative. This is almost impossible to fight against as even a boycott from a majority will not affect them. This has to be done at the shareholder level. Mass sell offs.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

So let us ignore the thousand others he has unbanned, let us focus on one person banned and damn him to hell for it. Damn him to be an obvious leftist that in no way supports our cause at all. I really question some of you sometimes, I really do.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will still take saving a million over sacrificing a thousand. The world is not some grand fantasy where everyone lives and dies in perfect harmony. I will say it again, and again, until some die hards here can understand. I WOULD RATHER A THOUSAND OF MY FUTURE ENEMY DIE, THEN LET THEM GAIN POWER TO HURT MILLIONS THAT ACTUALLY HOLD THEMSELVES TRUE. There is no room for argument with me here, this is my stance. If you want to be such a bleeding heart as to raise the child of your enemy, to cut you down while you sleep, you be that person. I am not that person. Sometimes you need to look at the overall goal, and sacrifices must be made.

1
RationalThought 1 point ago +2 / -1

Any sort of help is verboten, we must judge wholly and completely any sort of help received in our direction, either intentional or not. We must shut these people down that DARE to not be pure and attempt to help our cause. Damn them to Hell.

-2
RationalThought -2 points ago +1 / -3

The 90's were a great time for sermons. If I told you that this was a constant running battle, where these people actually got our church closed and fist fights broke out when they would come protest, I bet you wouldn't believe that either. I miss those days.

view more: Next ›