1
Rattamahatta 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's former chief science advisor. It shouldn't matter but don't leave this out, make it a target for easy dismissal.

1
Rattamahatta 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want to keep their narrative of climate change being the cause of the fires, to beat up Trump and distract the public. Just like last year, and the previous one.

19
Rattamahatta 19 points ago +19 / -0

That's literally the first thing German local radio (!) told me this morning as I was making coffee. First they said, there's fake news making the rounds that activists were lighting the forests on fire, that the FBI said they are "rumours". I thought, why is local German radio person telling me all this? Worldwide brain washing in progress. In a few hours everyone in the cucked world will repeat what radio lady said. No one will mention all these people caught making fire in the forests, and at that point they won't be able to process that information.

3
Rattamahatta 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, you could have presented a good counter argument. What's your theory? You don't have one, or otherwise you would have presented it by now, am I right?

2
Rattamahatta 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok then what's happening? What's the most likely explanation?

a) Conservatives are starting the fires to use as ammunition for yet another campaign about climate change

b) Politically neutrals are starting the fires just because they feel like it

c) The unhinged left are starting the fires to use as ammunition for yet another campaign about climate change

4
Rattamahatta 4 points ago +4 / -0

America can be your best friend or worst enemy. Choose between leading your world to prosperity, prestige and the modern age or remain a total shithole for the next 100 years.

3
Rattamahatta 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not allowed to watch this. Instead, I get this: @AmyMek's account has been withheld in Germany, France based on local law(s)

0
Rattamahatta 0 points ago +1 / -1

Documents can't make claims. They are documents of Viriginia Roberts Giuffre claims. And how would she know that? It doesn't say. There, saved you the click.

1
Rattamahatta 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's their source?

12
Rattamahatta 12 points ago +12 / -0

Maxwell:

To be clear, the press had described her as supplying underage girls for sex, but she had not been charged so I guess it would be more accurate to say we "suspected" v "knew"

But she was still ok with her being in their presence... Same with Polanski, Epstein.

1
Rattamahatta 1 point ago +1 / -0

They'll brick both of your living room windows even while you're cheering them on, because you're white.

view more: Next ›