5
RedDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Our election systems are completely fraudulent. Our democracy is just a public perception game, where the elites tell us who we voted for and use the press to try to make their claims convincing.

5
RedDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Her eyebrows are raised in the picture that you're pointing out. That's why her forehead looks shorter smart guy.

And the other pictures of her without that eyebrows being raised her hairline her hairstyle including being longer on one side than the other as well as the roots and her forehead and everything else all match. Almost certainly the same woman

4
RedDuck 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah but they wouldn't be number one above every comment together with a " Trump is full of s***" tag applied to every one of his tweets by the company itself.

5
RedDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not true. If he switched over to parler he would get just as much press and there would be the added bonus that his tweets went the riddled with insults and lies designed to make him look unpopular. If I were him I would have left Twitter years ago.

12
RedDuck 12 points ago +12 / -0

The real joke is even to pretend like the dude would act as a deterrent against cheating instead of as an enabler.

I guarantee you these people did not wait for him to leave, they were probably annoyed by the fact that he did leave but he probably need to get a cheeseburger or some s***.

5
RedDuck 5 points ago +6 / -1

Ah fuck that bullshit!

Arrest and prosecute the s*** out of every motherfuker you catch and they'll start ratting out the people who are higher up. That's how it works. Sitting back and doing the Jack schitt doesn't catch anybody.

The way I see people making excuses for Republicans is just pathetic. Grow some self-respect as a voter, start demanding that they take the actions that you voted for in order to preserve your damn Republic.

1
RedDuck 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think it's the only viable plan and it has the advantage that if it becomes popular within the next week or so and internet forums and even trends on social media, the Republican Party might finally kick into gear.

It's the one thing that conservative voters have control over, our one piece of Leverage in the political system. We can destroy the Republican Party build a new one from the ashes.

0
RedDuck 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hey if the Republicans come through, or even if they continue to fail and drag their feet, but the Supreme Court comes through, then I'll vote Republican again and hope we can slowly clean the party up.

To be honest, I wasn't even that devastated when I thought that Trump may have lost fair and square. I figured we would likely win the Senate and actually be pretty well-positioned for the future . But the testimonies I've seen over the past few days are convicting. The bastards stole it from us, and the Republicans appear to be helping in the cover-up, especially in Georgia. The two Republican Senators who expect to get my vote have been practically silent on the matter.

When you're having Insurrection the first thing you have to do is secure your own house and your own neighborhoods. You deal harshly with traitors first, then you can have a unified and more determined attack against your enemy.

We can peacefully protest all we want but we will have no leverage over Republicans or democrats. But if the Republican party is destroyed and a third-party Rises to take its place it will be the only party that actually supports its constituents in this country. It will be far more formidable.

As it is the Republican party is simply sabotaging our side every chance it has.

by warezit
1
RedDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

I cleaned up my comment a bit so that it was more legible, the earlier one was made on the fly using voice to text and it came out terribly.

And no you are simply incorrect to say that Mary and the pope are considered to be divine. I don't know how to correct you on that point. It's as if you just told me that it's legal to steal other people's property in the state of Alabama, and that that's why you don't like Alabama. I'm just at a loss.

by warezit
1
RedDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Pope, Mary, and the Saints are not considered to be divine. Indeed some Popes are very likely burning in hell.

But the point is you keep on talking about what's biblical and not as though you have a better understanding of the Bible than the early church fathers did, when they were the ones who actually put together the Bible in the first place and decided what counts as scripture and what doesn't.

This is especially ridiculous because you don't even know what they actually teach. You're rejecting the entire apostolic tradition, and thousands of years worth of theology produced by some of the smartest and holiest men who ever lived, and you're replacing it with your own ignorance. And you do it without even bothering to examine the teachings you are rejecting. You don't even know what they are.

6
RedDuck 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nonsense. Politics isn't just something they study in their off time, it's their job. They know more than anyone on this website, and if they don't know they should know.

So yeah, we vote them in because it's better than having a couple of Democrats. Then we impeach Brian Kemp and the Secretary of State and elect somebody who doesn't even come from the Republican Party Machine. Then we impeach these two senators and have the new governor replace them with people like Doug Collins.

Betrayal of these people cannot be forgotten

6
RedDuck 6 points ago +6 / -0

You also need a truck to go hunting, realistically.

by warezit
1
RedDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

The church's dogma that salvation comes through the Catholic Church alone is not inconsistent with saying that it is all ultimately through Jesus Christ's sacrifice. Because the church is the body of Christ on Earth and I can quote you scripture from Saint Paul if you want some kind of biblical support for that.

The church founded by Christ is not just a concept, nor is it the disjoint union of the faithful. It is a concrete entity whose existence stretches back to Christ himself. Every Bishop in the Catholic Church had his hands laid on him by a previous bishop, who in turn was ordained by a previous bishop, in a line that stretches all the way back to the apostles themselves. And it is this church that set the calendar of readings, including the very reading today that started my part in this thread.

To you the church is something like just a bunch of different creatures running around in the forest. To me the church is more like a tree, and its individual members are leaves branches roots, and so on. And just like the cells of my body do not have thoughts like I have thoughts, the individual members of the church are not what produces the dogmas and the teachings.

Likewise if some members of the church are bad that does not mean the church itself is bad. Nor does it have any effect on the validity of its teachings. And if you ignore some of the comments and behaviors of various prelates throughout the church's history, and focus just on the established dogmas and magisterial teachings, you will see that the Catholic church is indeed rock solid.

You apparently believe that the Church founded by Christ was not intended to have any kind of organizational structure whatsoever, because on your reading of scripture, you do not see that intention and Christ. All I can do in response is warn you against pride. If you read the early church Fathers, men far more intelligent and holy than you or I, you will see they disagree with you entirely. And many of these men died for Christ. You chosen to follow the theology have some random dude less than a couple of hundred years old. Worse than that you can't even fully commit to being a Baptist. You are just a holy one with your own theology.

But this isn't a matter of subjective opinion, this is a question of Eternal and Divine truth so unless you think you're some kind of a prophet you should maybe be more wary of your own personal theology.

by warezit
1
RedDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think one of the problems that women have is that they are generally more perceptive of what's going on inside of people's head than men are, on average. Whenever I attend a social event with a girlfriend I'm always shocked by how much stuff supposedly happened that I was totally unaware of.

So you women look around and you see the true nature of men and you juxtapose that against the ideals they proclaim and it makes you cynical about ideals in general.

I hope all the men here are paying attention. Your actions and intentions matter even when you think nobody is watching. Your ideals are only real to the extent that you actually live them out. It makes no difference how good you are at arguing in their favor.

This is also very important to keep in mind when raising children. Children see it too.

62
RedDuck 62 points ago +62 / -0

Hey I think I recognize this! Isn't this the same brilliant line of reasoning that my professor used to prove to me that Islam is a religion of peace?

See sometimes Christians commit murder, it's basically the same thing as Islamic terrorism, therefore Islam is a religion of peace and the only reason people say otherwise is because they're racist.

5
RedDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't think Justice is going to come through or legal system, because liberal judges are just as corrupt and dishonest as liberal poll workers and liberal senators and liberal news men and academics and liberal voters themselves.

I seriously think Trump needs to start making plans for creating a military junta under him to govern until this shit can be straightened out. I'd back it up at this point, we're already a Banana Republic.

1
RedDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well-placed, anonymous sources familiar with the voter's thinking, if and only if they are quoted by the New York Times or Washington Post. But don't believe your lying eyes.

by warezit
1
RedDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will do, pray for me as well!

by warezit
0
RedDuck 0 points ago +1 / -1

And I say to thee: That thou are Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven.

That's what Jesus Christ said in Matthew. I understand that protestant theologians will try to find ways to interpret this away, but to flatly say that the existence or need for a church is "not biblical" is quite a stretch.

This is the problem with scripture generally--different people interpret it in different ways, and how do you know who's right? For me, I rely on apostolic succession. This narrows me down to only really taking Catholic and Orthodox interpretations of scripture seriously, as opposed to relatively recent protestant innovations. This has been reinforced by the way most mainline protestant churches are now embracing modern sexual morality. Christianity has always been a faith of sexual purity, indeed it was born in a world of Greek and Roman decadence and stood out because of this (among other things). The fact that the mainline protestant denominations are now all folding under this shows that they were built on sand in the first place.

This in no way is meant to be an attack on the character of protestant worshippers. It is merely a defense of my own belief in the Catholic faith.

by warezit
1
RedDuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely correct.

by warezit
7
RedDuck 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes I agree. Although one thing to be clear on is that it is essential for us to stop sinning and start building virtue. From today's Gospel at daily mass (Catholic Church) we read:

Jesus said to his disciples: "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord," will enter the Kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.

"Everyone who listens to these words of mine and acts on them will be like a wise man who built his house on rock. The rain fell, the floods came, and the winds blew and buffeted the house. But it did not collapse; it had been set solidly on rock. And everyone who listens to these words of mine but does not act on them will be like a fool who built is house on sand. The rain fell, the floods came, and the winds blew and buffeted the house. And it collapsed and was completely ruined."

Paul is of course correct in that we cannot be saved by our own actions alone. Our sins cannot be forgiven, and we are incapable of reforming ourselves, without the grace of God. However it does not follow that our own cooperation with God's grace, as evidenced by works of righteousness, is unnecessary. To the contrary, every time we sin or fail to do good we are rejecting the grace of God. I know that most devout Protestants understand this but I think it's important always to remind people that simply believing in God and "loving" God, without true repentance which includes a reformation of one's way of life ("Go and sin no more.") is meaningless, or worse. It is to presume on God's mercy while you spit in His face.

Again I'm not accusing you of this, but it's important to warn against a Christianity that amounts to little more than merely feeling loved by God and feeling like one is full of the Holy Ghost. This is a house built on sand.

by warezit
42
RedDuck 42 points ago +47 / -5

I remember when the Sunday before the election became "Sizzlin Sunday" all of the sudden and I thought to myself, "they've learned nothing."

People still don't understand how we got here as a society, not even on the right. As long as you idiots keep encouraging your wives and daughters to behave like whores and your sons like perverted voyeurs nothing gets fixed. Even if Trump.pulls it off we'll be right back here in four years wondering how pedophilia got normalized.

Ask yourself if you were God would you grant this country mercy? When you indulge in a culture of fornication and perversion you are indulging a culture of death. That's always where it leads. And the sizzling Sunday crap just showed that a Trump victory would do little or nothing to stem the culture of death, because even his own supporters are mostly behind it, just to a lesser degree than those on the left.

From where I'm standing, if the only thing I care about is the salvation of souls then maybe a time of tyranny and oppression will be a better medicine. I pray to God this is not the case, but really I think it all depends on the hearts and minds of the American people.

2
RedDuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Start raising the wages and you'll get more applicants. But f*** that right? Just bring in people from foreign countries who are willing to work for less money and are easily exploited by the demagogue politicians who are the puppets of the very corporations who didn't want to raise wages in the first place.

See how it works? And best of all if you say this around any Normie they'll just call you a racist. What a f****** society we live in.

view more: Next ›