7
RememberKosciuszko 7 points ago +7 / -0

He's a what?

Colgate Granulate?

4
RememberKosciuszko 4 points ago +5 / -1

Nope!

It's actually some actor pranking gullible Qboomers. Read through the comments on various vids - guy admits it himself.

4
RememberKosciuszko 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well as someone who knows quite a number of people with such problems I'm quite aware of point you're trying to make

"Drugs would make society collapse". Really though? Netherlands (leftist cesspool, but that's beside the point), Czech Republic and Portugal would like to argue.

Lenient laws actually saved Portugal from societal collapse. Instead of criminalizing drug users they started to invest in rehab centers and similar projects. Number of addicts, homeless etc went significantly down over time.

Czech Republic has lenient drug laws AND gun laws and they don't have big issues with any of those things.

There are many high-functioning addicts, also. People that use drugs but still go on with their lives. Just look at all the prescription drugs people. Eating all the benzodiazepines and opioids, but still living their lives, although twisted. What's really the difference between the prescription and illegal drugs?

You think that young kids don't do illegal drugs around the world? Lmao. Boy, they do. Many approach drugs for the first time around the age of 15.

Making drugs legal would allow taxation to properly fund rehab centers and preventative education. Fund many, many things which could actually prevent drug use.

Current laws clearly don't work, and in my opinion make things worse

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well that's something I may agree on.

My point generally was - if a guy isn't quite able to change the way the things are, why not at least try to take advantage of it all?

If he's tied to certain job because of family/income/anything and turning his life around seems too much of hassle, he can always try to look for the advantages. Being a whistleblower, disruptor, and so on. War needs spies, doesn't it?

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, but it clearly must lead to such interpretations as was shown time and again on many photos and videos of muzzles banging fucking goats

Bestiality aside - Aisha. Is there really need to tackle any other issue?

Pedo love story

2
RememberKosciuszko 2 points ago +3 / -1

Well, yeah, war on drugs is ridiculous and immoral, not only because of what you said, but also because it really just benefits the criminals it supposedly fights.

Making something illegal makes a criminal a sole supplier of the good, which leads to monopoly held by the criminal world, which in turn leads to ridiculous prices, shady quality of the goods so on and so forth.

Decriminalizing/legalizing drug use/manufacture/distribution would kill gangs/mafias overnight. Those entities most likely fight tooth and nail across the world to keep things the way they are.

"War on drugs" can't be won globally. It's up to the individual. If people want to do drugs - they will. It's your duty to keep yourself/your family away from drugs and maintain a reasonable approach to the issue.

But, Floyd had a chance to save his life. Maybe not save himself from going to prison, but he could still be alive. No one forced him to swallow it/not to admit he did it and then proceed with medical procedure to save him.

2
RememberKosciuszko 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you're saying that undertakings like project Veritas are completely useless?

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Originator of the heavens and the earth; He made mates (azwajan) for you from among yourselves, and mates (azwajan) of the cattle too, multiplying you thereby; nothing like a likeness of Him; and He is the Hearing, the Seeing. S. 42:11 Shakir

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +1 / -0

In fact, the Quran never expressly condemns either bestiality or lesbianism, and we will shortly provide several texts which seem to be supporting what this Muslim scholar said. We even found one Muslim who honestly admitted that neither the Quran nor the so-called authentic hadith collections prescribe any kind of punishment for this gross perverted act of bestiality.

https://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/bestiality.htm

Read some, learn some

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yep, that's quite weird. People think that Vietnamese were just a bunch of complete rando asian rednecks sticking it to the man.

Lmao, like, no

As you said - they were battle hardened after fighting off the French, bigly. In quite the exotic terrain as well, not as easy to navigate as North America for the most part or Europe.

And also - they were very strongly supported by China and USSR with training personnel and sophisticated equipment, like anti-aircraft systems etc.

Not a couple of Joe's with AR-15s in Tennessee, but battle hardened maniacs with missiles from the neighboring superpower and educated personnel from their allies.

9
RememberKosciuszko 9 points ago +9 / -0

When a boatload of fentanyl you swallowed a while ago finally kicks in

23
RememberKosciuszko 23 points ago +23 / -0

Yes. Humor is scientifically proven method of dealing with taboo/unpleasant topics in humane, bearable manner. "Trust the science" libtard crowd should know this.

2
RememberKosciuszko 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, I'm not refuting the secession idea

This particular user is known for posting many good quotes and generally advocating stateless community, that's all, you can check for yourself

12
RememberKosciuszko 12 points ago +12 / -0

People tend to forget Vietnam had enormous support from China and USSR, supplying goddamn anti-aircraft systems and such. Vietcong on their own, without the support of ideological faction hellbent on convincing the world they're superior, would probably be steamrolled.

Stateless society would be, imho, uncomfortably vulnerable. I suspect it would create a risk of people simply saying "you know what, I could gain more if invaders succeed, might actually join them". Outlandish thought? Maybe.

Collectivism vs individualism. In my view, it's a spectrum issue, not of polar irreconcilable extremes. Like a slider in options menu.

Imho we need to find a sweet spot between the both of things. Allow many, many individual freedoms, but keep some minuscule amount of the things up to the "for the good of many" jig. I know it sounds "socialisty", but I'm sure you know what I mean.

14
RememberKosciuszko 14 points ago +14 / -0

Once again we agree.

People possessing guns does not suffice in modern times of jet fighters and armoured vehicles.

County/state armories with military equipment accessible to people based on civilian vote on given issue ("hey, DC is cooking something shitty, people in favor of show of force scream AYE!") although...

That's an idea that I feed everyone willing to listen in my country, a voluntary civilian militia comprised of people willing to sacrifice their time when push comes to shove and government needs to be reminded who's boss. It probably should be done with rotational service - no more than 3-6 months at a time and with random pool of people, to avoid the emergence of rogue factions.

Thoughts on this?

54
RememberKosciuszko 54 points ago +54 / -0

You've got a point here, and in many other cases in general

But I still don't agree on stateless solution

If people would be able to literally barge into DC in tanks if anyone does something shitty, American system would suffice

People need ability to exert substantial force.

Force solves many, many problems - more than people are comfortable to admit

6
RememberKosciuszko 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also quite ghey

2
RememberKosciuszko 2 points ago +2 / -0

It exudes soy

15
RememberKosciuszko 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yeah, let's shit on fellow pedes instead of, I don't know, encouraging to make the best out of such situation with whistleblowing, general "espionage" which could give crucial knowledge in advance or outright undermine the efforts of the enemy from within?

2
RememberKosciuszko 2 points ago +2 / -0

Area-51 rifle 😂

3
RememberKosciuszko 3 points ago +3 / -0

Final solution to the Viral Question I presume

Oh boy, where I heard something similar before?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›