Walensky, nee Bersoff, you say?
They ought to have one of those protests in downtown Beirut, the Lebanese flag is highly problematic. Also, the response of Beirut cops will probably give them a dose of perspective.
Makes sense, I jumped the gun on assuming OP had snagged this himself. I'd guess any vaguely right wing tweeter would be banned for cyberbullying the moment he posted an uncensored tweet.
Why censor the handle/twitter ID? Blacking those out prevents people verifying the tweet, getting context (is he a nutter or a satirist?) or finding other nuggets of wisdom from this deep thinker.
I like the cut of your jib
China must be shaking, their shitty equipment might fall apart on first use but it still beats a Twitter "clapback". The military is demeaning itself.
That was before they imported a permanent underclass who would forever be clients of the state. America as a "proposition nation" or an "idea" was always a poisonous lie. These guys pictured didn't see it coming and were hoodwinked or co-opted, but all those ideals of personal liberty, self-reliance and common justice? They came with the white man and they'll leave with him.
AOC and her ilk have exact congeners in any Central/South American shithole you can name, where the natural order of society is a generalissimo/General Secretary squatted over a bucket of crabs, shitting into it for as long it takes for one of the squabbling crustaceans inside to reach up and grab his balls and replace him with the same guy in different clothes. Maxine Waters and co. could have been considered passable statesmen in Liberia.
The Roman emperor Caligula reputedly made his horse a Senator, turned the imperial palace into a whorehouse, and yes, sent troops to do bizarre, futile things in the service of the voices in his head. History might not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.
Not safe for little boys either, if you look behind him.
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but an ear-shattering, billion-strong cacophony of honking
"Love" him right in his anus, I think he means
not because they claim they didn't do it, but because they don't think the charges are called for.
Hey, great defence. "Mr. Gere, I'm arresting you for murder, kidnapping, and importation of gerbils into California."
My monocle pops into my gin. "How rude! Totally uncalled for. I'll get your twitter account suspended for this, Officer, and I bid you good day!"
'This is the way people show their anger and frustration. Nothing else works,' she said.
My 'anger and frustration' at the cop's impudence is so much that I have to spend the evening money-laundering. That is society's fault.
It's literally democracy- you are explicitly answerable to your constituents when you are in elected office, and if they think somebody can do the job better, then they can put that person forward for a popular vote/Dominion-machine appointment.
Big fat Chris was a monster for jamming that bridge up for petty revenge, but Cuomo clocks in at a full 24 Harold Shipmans and it's crickets from the press.
So what?
What is the logical connection between her being the victim of a sex crime and Ted Cruz's efforts to dispute the election results? What does she expect me, you, or Ted Cruz to do about her victimisation at the hands of some fucked up degenerate we wouldn't know from Adam?
Being a victim doesn't give you moral authority, just like having AIDS doesn't make you a virologist.
Now has paedophilia attached to his name?
Don't be silly, that chest-thumping pose is a bit ridiculous when the guy is facing federal charges that may stick to some degree because the law says specifically not to do something. The law explicitly forbids the misuse of disclaimers (legal statements about the origin of electioneering literature). Is it a piffling charge, very rarely brought, done nakedly to advance the attocious HR1? Definitely, but it's a pretty solid one on the face of it. If it wasn't there, this prosecution would be an uphill struggle on all counts.
The rest I'd say is readily defensible as satire- that joke is an old one, and even if the group chats are brought in to show intent, I think voter suppression charges still fail- their evidence for it targeting blacks seems to hang on the woman in the picture being black.
The legality is probably to do with the 'imprint'- everything else is an easy argument for 1A protection, but you can't stick misleading imprints on things. If I were Ricky Vaughn, I'd be clamming up and forcing them to prove I originated that image
To satirise Democrats as the party of low information voters, and to create the famous twitter snowball effect by having Dems repeat the charge when their media outlets gin up a moral panic- namely that their voters are stupid/ill-informed enough to fall for an old joke.
The number was fake, I think- no money would change hands. The charge is probably based on "Paid for by Hillary for President 2016"- you can't give misleading origin statements. Funnily enough, I remember sharing that meme (or one much like it) myself.
Dead men don't need jobs, energy or money, and the coming wars will only swell their ranks. I'd say they voted in their interest.
Isn't it "unconstitutional" for them to turn off comments?
For a second I thought it could be the criminal Eric Ciaramella, a CIA gofer who wrongfully claimed whistleblower protections for leaking details of President Trump's communications to his corrupt political enemies, but it isn't the criminal Eric Ciaramella, it's the lispy queer Carlos Maza.
hereistheevidence.com has extensive lists of individual incidents, with states, sources and relative indicators of how serious and actionable the breaches were. As of this writing, they give a total of 1,744,440 ballots affected by irregularities.
Slightly off topic, but check the odd "tan lines" on the European/British girls' feet. That's likely to be a persistent meme from the war, where artificial "stains" such as tea (here, something more professional) were used to simulate wearing tights (which were nigh-impossible to get due to material rationing).