Exactly. These are the same people who will be knocking down your doors to confiscate your constitutionally-acquired firearms if the Dems continue to stay in charge.
BLM wants to riot? Well, it's not like cops haven't used drug laws to selectively enforce who they arrest for decades or anything like that. I'm not talking about the violent offenders here, who absolutely deserve to be in jail, rather, I'm referring specifically to the non-violent offenders who Kamala Harris bragged about putting in jail as DA.
It seems you are lacking in education regarding the hundreds of millions of people purposefully killed by their own communist dictators over the decades.
You don't seem to understand that they want you and your family dead and worse, and they laugh about it.
It does get kind of rough after realizing you've spent like $80 grand over the last 5 years, and could almost own the place outright, but I get the strangest feeling these people aren't quite complaining over THAT much money.
Throwing this out here as a wild suggestion, but what if the vaccine purposefully targets that specific mitochondrial disorder (but doesn't effect anyone else) in order to target a specific part of the population, or even just to test that the genome targeting works without raising any suspicions that it was targeted, e.g. by claiming: "looks like it was the fault of the rare disorder having an adverse reaction", averting suspicion that it was known from the beginning that it would have that reaction.
You could target any groups that share part of a genome and have a vaccine that only adversely reacts to them, for example.
Just spitballing the evil shit these people probably come up with.
It's often debated whether it is better to carry with a round already in the chamber and ready to fire at the pull of a trigger, or whether it is better to keep the chamber empty to prevent accidental or negligent discharges, as you have to rack the gun first in order to fire. However, in a dangerous situation that extra time could be the difference between life or death, hence the debate.
And also as a general rule of thumb, if you are handling an unloaded gun, it's never a bad idea to check the chamber and make sure there isn't a round still in there. It's deceiving because you may think the gun is safe because it has no magazine, when it may still have one in the chamber. Don't forget to always check, because it may save a life.
If you're wishing to unload your gun, eject the mag first and then once it's out of the gun, again, check to make sure you haven't forgotten a round in the chamber.
Yes and did you know that Trump was also a registered Democrat not long ago, before he decided to lead the cucked GOP? I'm dead serious as well. Registered Democrat. Absolutely unbelievable isn't it?
Oh, you still support him? Ok cool.
Sarcasm aside, I'm not sure if you're being willfully obtuse, or maybe you genuinely didn't know that. But you might find that if you do your own due diligence, and stop relying on others to regurgitate talking points for you, you might be able to put together a convincing rebuttal.
I get that the military is cucked, but I'm having trouble seeing why you'd blame Wood and Powell for the court's failure to uphold justice. I don't think they were out to sabotage Trump, I think they had good cases and the courts were absolutely (and offensively so) derelict in their duty.
Gotta have a little Hopium to offset the Doomium.
Please only take in the appropriate dosages for your weight class, however, as overdosing can result in unintended side effects such as tracking plane activity, or learning standard to advanced cryptography.
She'll just inject her experimental super botox and bulk up like Master Roshi.