I don’t really know all the trump lore, is Bannon still in contact with Trump?
I don't know whether he's still in direct contact with him, but it's possible. He's in frequent contact with people on the Trump legal team and campaign (such as Rudy Giuliani and Boris Epshteyn).
Can we trust his word on this?
We won't know for sure until tomorrow, but he's a pretty no-nonsense guy who doesn't tend to go for theatrics, and the way he smiles in this clip doesn't look like acting to me.
It's hard to come to terms with the fact that 42.7 million women paid someone to kill their child.
That's 42.7 million babies, not women. Many abortions are performed on women who have already had one or more - sometimes in the same year (like Alyssa Milano, who had two abortions in 1993).
"See, according to Cocteau's plan, I'm the enemy. Cause I like to think, I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech and freedom of choice. I'm the kind of guy who wants to sit in a greasy spoon and think, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecued ribs with the side order of gravy fries?" I want high cholesterol. I want to eat bacon, butter and buckets of cheese, okay? I want to smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in a non-smoking section. I wanna run through the streets naked with green Jello all over my body reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly might feel the need to. Okay, pal? I've seen the future, you know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin sittin' around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake singing "I'm an Oscar-Meyer Wiener"."
The FBI has an entire team designed to grooming and aiding terrorists. All they have to do to let these attacks happen is not arrest the person they radicalized and helped plan their attack.
I've long suspected that this is how the Boston Marathon Bombing happened.
We Got This Covered is notorious for being unreliable when it comes to leaks and rumors. Plus, that article is a month old, meaning that it was published before "Rangers of the New Republic" was officially announced.
There's no way that Sasha Banks' character could replace Cara Dune like the article claims, as of the two, only Cara Dune is a law enforcement officer (fitting with the whole ranger theme).
Sean Young of Blade Runner fame was considered "difficult to work with" in the late 80s and 90s, which derailed most of her career.
From what I heard, she genuinely did have mental problems at the time that made her hard to work with. She stalked Tim Burton, for example (which is what led to her being fired from "Batman Returns" and replaced with Michelle Pfeiffer).
This is what Pedro Pascal is trying to do to Gina Carano on The Mandalorian.
Shockingly (considering how vicious he has been toward Trump supporters), he hasn't criticized her, and actually showed support for her during one of her bouts with cancel culture by posting a drawing of Mando and Cara Dune hugging. Here it is:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CIBeC99jiDQ/
Unsurprisingly, the cancel culture mobs were mad at him for doing this. Just read the comments on that Instagram post to see examples.
Similarly, even though Mark Ruffalo is a flaming SJW, he came out in support of Chris Pratt when Pratt was being targeted by the cancel culture mobs for not attending a Biden fundraiser.
My guess is that a lot of out-of-touch Hollywood SJWs like Pedro Pascal and Mark Ruffalo find it easy to demonize right-wing people, Christians, or non-leftists as a whole in the general public because it's easy to straw-man people you don't know, but when they personally know a person like Carano or Pratt, it's a lot harder to demonize them after intewracting with them personally and seeing that they're nice people despite thinking differently. The Hollywood bubble is a real thing.
She has even publicly supported investigating the election for fraud.
Disney already announced that they are making a spinoff series called "Rangers of the New Republic". Although it hasn't been definitively confirmed yet, it is believed that Cara Dune (Gina Carano's character) will be the star, or at least one of the main characters.
He started the video with these exact words:
"Today I want to explain to you why I am so determined to pursue every legal and Constitutional option available to stop the theft of the Presidential election".
Take note of the highlighted portion.
He's saying that pursuing every option that he can. And he's asking us to do what we can in addition to that.
13 And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
14 And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting:
15 And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables;
16 And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise.
17 And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up.
13 And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
14 And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting:
15 And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables;
16 And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise.
17 And his disciples remembered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up.
It seems like they're twisting his words. He was in a Newsmax interview with Sean Spicer and had a hard time hearing soem of the questions. Here's the clip so you can hear what he said in context:
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/rudy-giuliani-pennsylvania-scotus-lawsuit/2020/12/21/id/1002628/
The relevant part starts about 6:11.
No one within the system is going to hand Trump the win. It just won’t happen.
He needs to take it. And if he doesn’t, he won’t have anyone else to blame but himself, and it pains me to say this.
We are at war. Not a legal war, actual war, and it’s time for Trump to start acting like it.
He might be waiting until all (or most) of the court cases are either finished or thrown out so he can fully justify using the Insurrection Act by saying "Well, I tried to do this the easy way, but enforcing the laws through the ordinary course of judicial proceedings was impracticable."
Relevant quote from the Insurrection Act:
"Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion."
Or maybe, those who want him to cross the Rubicon have the wrong river in mind, and he's going to cross the Delaware on Christmas Eve like George Washington did for the element of surprise (Federal holiday).
Considering that his 2016 win may have been a literal miracle, I wouldn't count divine intervention out.