This was, without a doubt, the most compelling piece of information presented at the presser today. Reading between the lines here, I don't think Sydney is one to parrot some unconfirmed Tweets--she is Flynn's attorney.
This was a huge piece of information and while we truly don't know that the good guys or the bad guys got the data, we now know there in fact WAS a military op to secure the drives. We're truly in for a wild, wild ride.
I'm urging all members of this forum to not make any windfall purchases for the next 6 months minimum. Enjoy your holidays and have a nice Christmas, but no new cars and no new debts. 6 months. Things could get very very hairy. I have a feeling Powell and Rudy are the front smoke screen for the real battle happening behind the scenes.
I have a very good suspicion the good guys know how it works and are keen on places to check.
I'd volunteer my time to investigate the hardware if I could, but I'm sure there's a IT forensic team better than me on the case.
Hi, I am an analyst. Nothing is really lost. The digital fingerprint of code self deleting would remain. There would be data to demonstrate that something happened, i.e. a job was ran on the computer.
That said, I bet it's not that creative. If these numbers that are being presented are correct, then the code is not that sophisticated. There are so many better ways of voting manipulation and are less visible.
If I were tasked with this investigation I'd want to see the software code, and the hardware code. If I had to skew results, I'd have it done at the hardware level--this would be much easier to hide.
How hard would it be to get one of these boxes? How is it people steal ATM's all the time, but one of these voting machines never turns up on Craigslist?
Voting machines should be 100% open source and 100% disconnected from the internet at all times. The images should be hashed, and public so if any changes are made at the hardware or software level it's easily identified. Why some glowie company does it is beyond me. Why these cloak and daggers and illusion of security when there are more secure ways of doing it. It could be made to be more secure than paper voting. The only reason I can legitimately think of as to why it's not is due to fraud protection, as opposed to prevention. No reason for any of this nonsense in 2020.
I live in California. I received two mail in ballots this year. One to my current address, and the other to my former address. I retrieved the ballot at my former address to prevent fraud.
I ended up voting in person, and turning in my current address ballot at the polling station.
Tonight I just checked the Status of my mail in votes. Both are being shown as "Received" but not counted as I already voted. I'm looking at the one from my former address, and the other I dutifully turned in, so how can they be marked as "received?"
I believe the play in CA was to send out mail-ins to everyone. Those who voted in person, the vote was counted correctly. Those individuals who turned mailed in had their ballots changed to Biden, regardless of who they voted for, and regardless if they even mailed it in! I will be calling my local election office on Monday to clarify.
This occurred in Solano county.
I'm buying metals too. Brass.